Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why The Internet Is Disturbed By This ‘X-Men’ Poster *Trigger Warning* [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)268. The poster is not a superhero movie.
The poster is a public display. Its recipients have no choice but to see it. For a minute I thought your question was going to be, how do those responsible for placing this public advertisement go outside without gagging at themselves for choosing an image of sexualized violence against a hot blue woman with her tongue lolling and so obviously thrusting it at the 90% of the people who don't give a shit about the movie and will never see it. Why do they think this sells, and if they do, why do they do it anyway?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
293 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why The Internet Is Disturbed By This ‘X-Men’ Poster *Trigger Warning* [View all]
sheshe2
Jun 2016
OP
I also think the IPs being in separate hands keeps MCU from getting too bloated.
Act_of_Reparation
Jun 2016
#185
Angelina Jolie has beaten up and been beat up by males in her movies for years.
Calista241
Jun 2016
#236
Yes, because the idea behind the poster is to show a character (Mystique) who is a known butt-kicker
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2016
#197
I don't like the term "outside". Please use non-roofedness in the future.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2016
#93
Saw the movie with my former wife (separated). Neither of us mentioned that scene afterwards.
mikehiggins
Jun 2016
#4
Though perhaps not those with the most right to complain -- females in fandom/ons/etc.
moriah
Jun 2016
#149
A poster featuring Jennifer Lopez in "Enough" being choked would be over the line
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jun 2016
#253
You trying to tie an X-Men poster to any serious feminist cause is hilariously sad.
phleshdef
Jun 2016
#204
This movie poster is not a problem. If it is a problem, you're going to need to go back in time
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2016
#90
You've failed at trying to put words in my mouth. Do you recall sentence diagramming from school?
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2016
#97
It's slightly more prevalent than violence against men in a domestic context.
sibelian
Jun 2016
#156
The tactic 'putting words into the mouths of others' is a bully's tactic, it is a form of rhetorical
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#165
I agree about the VAW aspect, but I really don't understand the color argument...
Humanist_Activist
Jun 2016
#143
"Am I the only person to note that the victim in that picture is not white, and her attacker is?"
Lordquinton
Jun 2016
#144
I see you have the time to respond, could it be you don't want to answer in which
A Simple Game
Jun 2016
#172
Done, and it is worth seeing. Not as good as Captain America Civil War
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2016
#125
This was an epic, life or death struggle in a super hero movie for the fate of the world.
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2016
#35
Anyone "sold" expecting going to see women lose is going to be very disappointed if there are.....
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jun 2016
#60
I am intrigued: how would they want "a gay male being strangled by a hetero" depicted?
MisterP
Jun 2016
#62
it doesn't help matters the character is shown running around naked through the whole movie
Bucky
Jun 2016
#65
Putting the poster aside....Are you saying no female character can be harmed?
davidn3600
Jun 2016
#68
They're also not using actually blue actors to portray blue characters.
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2016
#79
Now that you mention it, I'm disgusted with it too. Sick of it. So pervasive.
lostnfound
Jun 2016
#85
And how would one enact this hypothetical non-encountering of violence in movies?
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2016
#91
Because you don't show your new villain getting their ass kicked in promotion
TheKentuckian
Jun 2016
#151
Just imagine if it had been a picture of Spiderwoman's butt strangling her!
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2016
#147
Full disclosure: Comics and superheroes, etc. were just never my bag.
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2016
#150
Wonder if people are capable of rational thought? or if poutrage is the way of the future?
ileus
Jun 2016
#154
I'd like the OP and the author of this piece to very specifically explain how they imagine a
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#166
You can't demand women be equal combatants and then complain about violence against them.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2016
#194
For someone griping about violence against women you have an interesting choice of signature imagery
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2016
#215
A movie where a woman fleeing a violent partner is shot through the head.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2016
#220
Are you saying, because Beatrix is able to not remain a victim but ultimately gains the upper hand
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2016
#223
No, what I'm saying is you're protesting the movie in the OP even though
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2016
#227
An ad that is trying to show the magnitude of the threat posed by the villain by showing
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2016
#229
I have not seen "The Hateful Eight" but it sounds like one could make the argument
hughee99
Jun 2016
#213
Anybody aware of what "the internet" has brought the collective overmind over the past 20 years
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2016
#242
20th Century Fox has now apologized for the ad called "casual violence against women."
IronLionZion
Jun 2016
#241
Maybe some folks here should just pretend she's a Millennial Bernie Sanders supporter
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2016
#247
I can't agree with it being offensive due to violence against women...
PersonNumber503602
Jun 2016
#250
When the cost of the apology is balanced against the free publicity generated by the "outrage"
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2016
#257