Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
268. The poster is not a superhero movie.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:33 PM
Jun 2016

The poster is a public display. Its recipients have no choice but to see it. For a minute I thought your question was going to be, how do those responsible for placing this public advertisement go outside without gagging at themselves for choosing an image of sexualized violence against a hot blue woman with her tongue lolling and so obviously thrusting it at the 90% of the people who don't give a shit about the movie and will never see it. Why do they think this sells, and if they do, why do they do it anyway?

I get that yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #1
No disagreement but... PJMcK Jun 2016 #10
Not retired, taken from FOX and given back to Marvel so they can do it right Rosco T. Jun 2016 #12
Do it right? LostOne4Ever Jun 2016 #141
I also think the IPs being in separate hands keeps MCU from getting too bloated. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2016 #185
I didn't know part 1 of your post but appreciate the knowledge yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #14
It'll never be the last one. Chan790 Jun 2016 #240
It's not the same; greiner3 Jun 2016 #39
Angelina Jolie has beaten up and been beat up by males in her movies for years. Calista241 Jun 2016 #236
Jennifer Lawrence may have no say whatsoever on the poster. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #272
my take on it quickesst Jun 2016 #2
She's also one of the X men that can hold her own in a physical fight. Volaris Jun 2016 #163
Sounds reasonable to me quickesst Jun 2016 #169
I see her in that position and I see a moment Bettie Jun 2016 #171
Exactly!! quickesst Jun 2016 #219
She,'s not portrayed in the poster as ,'poweful"... whathehell Jun 2016 #179
Yes, because the idea behind the poster is to show a character (Mystique) who is a known butt-kicker Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #197
Okay...I'm not that familiar with the series whathehell Jun 2016 #211
Hopefully, this will help shed more light on the character -- Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #217
My opinion quickesst Jun 2016 #226
Please.'re-read my post.. whathehell Jun 2016 #230
Sorry, the movie, character and plot are irrelevant. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #267
It seems.. quickesst Jun 2016 #274
I'm sorry, you are missing the point. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #275
How do these people go outside...? TipTok Jun 2016 #3
Agree, Tiptok SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #5
Hey Strom Jr!! CatWoman Jun 2016 #245
Catwoman SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #248
you are more optimistic than I am CatWoman Jun 2016 #252
18 houses. SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #261
They're not happy unless everyone around them is miserable. Skeeter Barnes Jun 2016 #48
I don't like the term "outside". Please use non-roofedness in the future. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #93
Show some sensitivity... TipTok Jun 2016 #110
You got me there. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #111
Oh my GummyBearz Jun 2016 #238
How do these people go outside...? AlbertCat Jun 2016 #191
The poster is not a superhero movie. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #268
Who cares if they see it? TipTok Jun 2016 #276
It's not using "sexy women" to sell films. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #277
I understand on an intellectual level... TipTok Jun 2016 #280
This is not "society." JackRiddler Jun 2016 #281
Billboards are out in society... TipTok Jun 2016 #282
I think advertisers should get whatever they want. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #284
Its a sexy woman in a fight.... TipTok Jun 2016 #286
They can pick a different image to promote the movie... JackRiddler Jun 2016 #287
I think you are projecting a bit... TipTok Jun 2016 #288
I think you are denying more than a bit. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #289
My image was from a previous one... TipTok Jun 2016 #290
Meh. You are the one pretending to be image-illiterate. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #291
Military recruitment ad wouldn't do much good... TipTok Jun 2016 #292
I didn't see it two weeks ago. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #293
Saw the movie with my former wife (separated). Neither of us mentioned that scene afterwards. mikehiggins Jun 2016 #4
Please, stop trying to drag context into it ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2016 #9
Though perhaps not those with the most right to complain -- females in fandom/ons/etc. moriah Jun 2016 #149
A poster featuring Jennifer Lopez in "Enough" being choked would be over the line ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2016 #253
They were pretty careful with triggering imagery in trailers, etc there. moriah Jun 2016 #266
More fan discussion of what's in the movies. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #279
The movie is not the context. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #269
No context? dark forest Jun 2016 #6
So what? JackRiddler Jun 2016 #283
Oh please, she probably ends up kicking that thing's ass. Throd Jun 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #33
ACK!! SPOILER ALERT PLEASE! DeadLetterOffice Jun 2016 #41
Dude...wtf? Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #53
only in the next movie Mystique turns out to be a mole Bucky Jun 2016 #67
Yep...an actual mole. Pic related: Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #207
Changed her name to Mole-Woman Bucky Jun 2016 #235
If the internet is disturbed then the internet is fucked. AngryAmish Jun 2016 #8
Yes, when the internet and women IRL sheshe2 Jun 2016 #17
You realize this is not real life, yes? AngryAmish Jun 2016 #18
OMG!!! I choked! Quackers Jun 2016 #28
This... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #54
Went staright over your head. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #73
Jury results - LEAVE IT 6-1 George II Jun 2016 #77
OMG. Thank you George. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #80
look away child! LOOK AWAY! snooper2 Jun 2016 #176
You trying to tie an X-Men poster to any serious feminist cause is hilariously sad. phleshdef Jun 2016 #204
The poster takes up space in real life, in a public area. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #285
What does this have to do with marriage? Do you mean misogyny? Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #216
I wonder if this one will make it to 377 Major Nikon Jun 2016 #11
Because people are running out of real problems. linuxman Jun 2016 #13
VAW is no longer a real problem. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #20
This may come as a shock to you, but X-men is a movie. linuxman Jun 2016 #22
Women take a hit every day and we keep going. nt sheshe2 Jun 2016 #92
Yet this (fictional) movie seems to have stopped a few others cold. linuxman Jun 2016 #96
You just don't get it. nt sheshe2 Jun 2016 #100
Oh. Okay then. linuxman Jun 2016 #102
There is nothing to get. You are absurd. phleshdef Jun 2016 #200
And you don't know what you are talking about Loki Liesmith Jun 2016 #259
Well you don't know what you are talking about... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #260
So, no more female superheroes Bettie Jun 2016 #173
This movie poster is not a problem. If it is a problem, you're going to need to go back in time DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #90
VAW is not a big thing? Alrighty then. nt sheshe2 Jun 2016 #94
You've failed at trying to put words in my mouth. Do you recall sentence diagramming from school? DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #97
Nobody said that but you. linuxman Jun 2016 #98
It's slightly more prevalent than violence against men in a domestic context. sibelian Jun 2016 #156
The tactic 'putting words into the mouths of others' is a bully's tactic, it is a form of rhetorical Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #165
I would disagree skepticscott Jun 2016 #181
Maybe you want all the female superheroes... TipTok Jun 2016 #114
I suspect around 50 /50. AlbertCat Jun 2016 #195
Are DU'ers actually suggesting you... yallerdawg Jun 2016 #15
"Casual internet misogyny." sheshe2 Jun 2016 #16
This is a venue where a woman can be told okasha Jun 2016 #24
Bricks are okay here. A leave!!!!!! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #29
Got your back, sister. okasha Jun 2016 #113
Love you back! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #131
"the victim in that picture is not white, and her attacker is?" melman Jun 2016 #32
The woman in the picture can become any color she wants. christx30 Jun 2016 #40
Two points. okasha Jun 2016 #123
Yes! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #132
I agree about the VAW aspect, but I really don't understand the color argument... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #143
It's evident to anyone who has bothered to educate themselves, okasha skepticscott Jun 2016 #170
you are correct! Remember the outrage when this came out! snooper2 Jun 2016 #180
Two points phleshdef Jun 2016 #201
How do you know it is a man's hand? Egnever Jun 2016 #234
Species: opposable thumb. okasha Jun 2016 #265
"Am I the only person to note that the victim in that picture is not white, and her attacker is?" Lordquinton Jun 2016 #144
Yes. You are the only person to notice that. sibelian Jun 2016 #159
Her coloration (blue) has nothing to do with race skepticscott Jun 2016 #162
Have you seen this! I walked out of this movie, blatant shaming- snooper2 Jun 2016 #178
Help help...I'm being repressed. Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #56
I didn't vote for you... TipTok Jun 2016 #119
Love it... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #120
I try not to associate with anyone... TipTok Jun 2016 #124
. Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #126
People that can't see misogyny are bound to repeat it. William769 Jun 2016 #19
Thank you. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #21
And people that see it when nothing is there...? n/t A Simple Game Jun 2016 #25
See post #19. William769 Jun 2016 #27
In case you didn't notice, that was the post I was responding to. A Simple Game Jun 2016 #37
Still same response. William769 Jun 2016 #44
I see you have the time to respond, could it be you don't want to answer in which A Simple Game Jun 2016 #172
I disagree. This is an action film Quackers Jun 2016 #23
This is not a film. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #278
Where's the context? Matrosov Jun 2016 #26
Hmmm... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #55
Why not, who doesn't like shapeshifting badass hottie! snooper2 Jun 2016 #183
Lets just not cast any women in action movies, so you wont be offended. Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #30
Boom... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #86
Or... rpannier Jun 2016 #101
So now Mutants want equal rights? Reter Jun 2016 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #36
Seriously, stop with the plot reveals DeadLetterOffice Jun 2016 #42
So sorry. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #45
Self delete... TipTok Jun 2016 #122
Done, and it is worth seeing. Not as good as Captain America Civil War Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #125
You just saved people the trouble of watching the movie. Nicely done. Orrex Jun 2016 #43
Which is why I said "Mystique is mostly a villain anyway" Reter Jun 2016 #57
Which is more of a threat? cagefreesoylentgreen Jun 2016 #34
Your post is sheshe2 Jun 2016 #46
Actually cagefreesoylentgreen Jun 2016 #50
So please. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #52
"Handle" is another word for "username" EvolveOrConvolve Jun 2016 #66
Blue lives matter! X_Digger Jun 2016 #58
You are a DU monitor? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #59
Your post is Rather antagonistic toward me. AlbertCat Jun 2016 #198
This was an epic, life or death struggle in a super hero movie for the fate of the world. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #35
No. The movie is irrelevant. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #270
Mystique is a violent, dangerous, psychopath of a woman IronLionZion Jun 2016 #38
Thanks ILZ. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #49
Anyone "sold" expecting going to see women lose is going to be very disappointed if there are..... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2016 #60
Also, his arm is too short in that poster. Orrex Jun 2016 #47
He's a mutant. It might just be his birth defect Bucky Jun 2016 #63
Nice post, Winter Soldier. Orrex Jun 2016 #64
In this case... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #51
Hey Buddy, sheshe2 Jun 2016 #69
You are 100% correct... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #71
What would please me... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #133
Are you okay with violence... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #135
Because you didn't answer my question... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #136
Hey Bud. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #138
Sheshe.... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #140
Apparently, female protagonists may only fight female antagonists demwing Jun 2016 #61
Yep, nothing like some good old fashioned girl-on-girl action.... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #174
I am intrigued: how would they want "a gay male being strangled by a hetero" depicted? MisterP Jun 2016 #62
it doesn't help matters the character is shown running around naked through the whole movie Bucky Jun 2016 #65
Putting the poster aside....Are you saying no female character can be harmed? davidn3600 Jun 2016 #68
Whoooosh! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #70
That's because you reached really... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #72
Buddy. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #74
And you are doing the feminist movement a great disservice... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #76
I called people names? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #78
I didn't say "women"...YOU just did. Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #81
Why even bother melman Jun 2016 #112
:( sheshe2 Jun 2016 #134
Indeed, whoosh. So much so that it seems deliberate. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #273
Somebody is always disturbed by something mythology Jun 2016 #75
They're also not using actually blue actors to portray blue characters. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #79
. Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #82
You mean they're.. *gasp* actors in blue-face?!?? X_Digger Jun 2016 #87
The Blue Man Group was busy. Dr. Strange Jun 2016 #95
Yet another slight for Tobias! opiate69 Jun 2016 #104
... Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #105
Is anybody mad that it happens in the movie? Iggo Jun 2016 #83
Who knows... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #84
The movie is different Bradical79 Jun 2016 #115
Within the whole scene where it happened, it works. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #128
Now that you mention it, I'm disgusted with it too. Sick of it. So pervasive. lostnfound Jun 2016 #85
What would your suggestion be? Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #88
And how would one enact this hypothetical non-encountering of violence in movies? DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #91
I agree... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #99
Some people thrive on drama. I can do without it. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #103
Just don't show it as the centerpiece ad. lostnfound Jun 2016 #158
Everything is a trigger warning to the internet. romanic Jun 2016 #89
I'll have you know rolly eyes are my trigger. linuxman Jun 2016 #107
Sorry. romanic Jun 2016 #127
There's a line... TipTok Jun 2016 #231
. linuxman Jun 2016 #106
You missed the point. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #109
Don't know what INL is, linuxman Jun 2016 #116
I meant in real life...... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #121
Then you sure picked a shitty example to talk about it. linuxman Jun 2016 #129
"In a practical sense." sheshe2 Jun 2016 #137
You weren't talking about domestic violence until this post. linuxman Jun 2016 #167
This is what sells ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #108
Sweet lawd! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #117
I know ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #190
Yet melman Jun 2016 #118
What's your point? ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #189
The point is melman Jun 2016 #237
Because you don't show your new villain getting their ass kicked in promotion TheKentuckian Jun 2016 #151
We are talking about an ad for a movie ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #188
... sibelian Jun 2016 #157
And what is the focus here? ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #187
To Kick Ass, Or not to Kick Ass.... snooper2 Jun 2016 #192
True. ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #196
Using an attractive actress... TipTok Jun 2016 #232
what is really sad is DonCoquixote Jun 2016 #130
They are all Panned? LostOne4Ever Jun 2016 #139
Geeze NobodyHere Jun 2016 #142
He's the bad guy in the movie it's supposed to be offensive. craigmatic Jun 2016 #145
They went with a cheap shot, but the entire industry is that way now. Rex Jun 2016 #146
Just imagine if it had been a picture of Spiderwoman's butt strangling her! Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #147
The marvel drawing heard around the world. Rex Jun 2016 #148
Full disclosure: Comics and superheroes, etc. were just never my bag. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #150
I was more a Piers Anthony nerd then an Xmen nerd. Rex Jun 2016 #212
You're so brave for bringing this up on this board. prayin4rain Jun 2016 #152
"brave" is the new...[insert adjective here] uhnope Jun 2016 #153
It isn't brave. sibelian Jun 2016 #155
Wonder if people are capable of rational thought? or if poutrage is the way of the future? ileus Jun 2016 #154
Good grief... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #160
They know their market SecularMotion Jun 2016 #161
I'm not offended by this at all. Captain Stern Jun 2016 #164
I'd like the OP and the author of this piece to very specifically explain how they imagine a Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #166
Holy shit, which idiot thought this was a good idea? Odin2005 Jun 2016 #168
Oh Jesus S. Christ on a fucking Hoverboard- What stupid idiocy... snooper2 Jun 2016 #175
The irony is the film is very pro-woman. apnu Jun 2016 #177
Good for the movie. The poster is not. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #271
Is Mystique female? Act_of_Reparation Jun 2016 #182
Now *that* is an interesting point ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #193
Anyone that is deeply offended by this is pathetic. DesMoinesDem Jun 2016 #184
Fuck this crap. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #186
You can't demand women be equal combatants and then complain about violence against them. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #194
More over the top people looking for imaginary sexism phleshdef Jun 2016 #199
"Imaginary sexism" ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #202
There is real sexism. Idiots who go off about nothing burgers... phleshdef Jun 2016 #203
And who decides? ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #205
ME. phleshdef Jun 2016 #206
Okey dokey. ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #208
For someone griping about violence against women you have an interesting choice of signature imagery Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #215
My favorite fucking movies ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #218
A movie where a woman fleeing a violent partner is shot through the head. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #220
See that's my favorite fucking scene ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #221
Are you saying, because Beatrix is able to not remain a victim but ultimately gains the upper hand Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #223
I consider it a fable of sorts ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #224
No, what I'm saying is you're protesting the movie in the OP even though Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #227
First, I'm not protesting the movie ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #228
An ad that is trying to show the magnitude of the threat posed by the villain by showing Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #229
WTF??? ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #249
That sounds more like your problem. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #255
I think maybe they need to stop casting women in these kind of movies. hughee99 Jun 2016 #209
It's not fight scenes ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #210
I have not seen "The Hateful Eight" but it sounds like one could make the argument hughee99 Jun 2016 #213
That reality doesn't exist, and is part of the point ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #214
#MutantLivesMatter! Heeeeers Johnny Jun 2016 #222
2 or 3 idiotic bloggers do not = "the internet" TheSarcastinator Jun 2016 #225
Anybody aware of what "the internet" has brought the collective overmind over the past 20 years Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #242
So female super heroes can't fight? Egnever Jun 2016 #233
It's Apocalypse. Arkana Jun 2016 #239
THIRTEEN MORE DAYS! Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #243
20th Century Fox has now apologized for the ad called "casual violence against women." IronLionZion Jun 2016 #241
Thank you. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #244
Thank God, Our Long National Nightmare Is Over. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #246
Maybe some folks here should just pretend she's a Millennial Bernie Sanders supporter Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #247
For reals opiate69 Jun 2016 #262
Two shitty posts that should have been hidden Orrex Jun 2016 #264
I can't agree with it being offensive due to violence against women... PersonNumber503602 Jun 2016 #250
Well.... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #251
Probably just to console the inconsolable. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #256
When the cost of the apology is balanced against the free publicity generated by the "outrage" Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #257
I have yet to see anything whatsoever that 'the internet' is upset about... Shandris Jun 2016 #254
Thanks for the trigger warning GummyBearz Jun 2016 #258
There is no context in the ad, just a woman getting strangled. Nevernose Jun 2016 #263
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why The Internet Is Distu...»Reply #268