Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

malthaussen

(17,184 posts)

4. No, no, you misunderstand.

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 10:23 AM

Jul 2016

Had it been Mr Justice Trump on the Court, the force of his personality and intellect would have swayed all the justices into a unanimous vote.

Well, except maybe for the women.

-- Mal

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Now if Scalia were replaced by me (Trump) we wouldn't have that [View all] kpete Jul 2016 OP

Nobody ever said Trump had been trained in the most basic mathematical functions. MohRokTah Jul 2016 #1

trump makes clarence thomas look scholarly.... spanone Jul 2016 #2

Is this Trump U math? n/t Yavin4 Jul 2016 #3

No, no, you misunderstand. malthaussen Jul 2016 #4

if any women needed another reason to vote against Trump RussBLib Jul 2016 #5