Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(148,696 posts)
4. Sounds pretty stupid, for sure.
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 10:32 AM
Aug 2016

How often do such incidents occur, I wonder. I've never seen anything like on any of the many flights I have taken since the TSA was put into place. What I've seen is a fairly simple system to get through. I've had a few pat downs, had my carry ons screened, and other minor delays, but that's it. Each time, I was told why and the process took just a few minutes.

I suspect that situations like this one are very, very rare. There may be even more to the story that wasn't presented by this particular website. I don't know. Anonymous isn't known for its accuracy in representing things like this, quite frankly, nor is theantimedia.org, the original source of the story. Both are anti-government advocacy sites, pretty much.

I still fly. I will continue to fly. My experiences have been fine, overall.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's a thoroughly stupid system, set up by BushCheney Hekate Aug 2016 #1
I made it through that painful story Divine Discontent Aug 2016 #2
Driving looks better every day. Photographer Aug 2016 #7
Not for me. MineralMan Aug 2016 #8
Give it time and you'll be the guy with the pitchfork. Photographer Aug 2016 #10
Huh? MineralMan Aug 2016 #11
TSA are scum, every last one of them. Odin2005 Aug 2016 #3
Sounds pretty stupid, for sure. MineralMan Aug 2016 #4
Government robots. lpbk2713 Aug 2016 #5
jesus ProfessorPlum Aug 2016 #6
Security theater Patiod Aug 2016 #9
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»18 Government Agents Used...»Reply #4