Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)

7. Its irrelevant what the majority thought its more relavaent what the law says...

Reply to Jarqui (Reply #5)

Sun Oct 30, 2016, 09:16 AM

Oct 2016

... and the law says she didn't do anything to support taking her to trial over the emails.

Comey professionaly and ethically had no position to editorialize what he thought in regards to the investigation either, who gives a fuck what he thinks about so and so I want to know what the law says.

It is wingerish to laud ones reality over reality itself

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Comey's letter breaks with DOJ tradition and w/views of AG Loretta Lynch [View all] ellenrr Oct 2016 OP

Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #1

No, Comey could not have "nailed Hillary last summer." SunSeeker Oct 2016 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Jarqui Oct 2016 #5

Comey could not recommend charges without evidence. SunSeeker Oct 2016 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author Jarqui Oct 2016 #8

Its irrelevant what the majority thought its more relavaent what the law says... uponit7771 Oct 2016 #7

Indeed he did break DOJ policy. On so many levels. nt SunSeeker Oct 2016 #3

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #4