Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hacked election [View all]loyalsister
(13,390 posts)3. It was irresponsible when Trump said it before the election
and it's irresponsible to make this claim everytime we lose whether there is irrefutable, unquestionable evidence. It is in our best interest to resist and be there for our frightened brothers and sister, hold him and congress acountable in whatever way possible. And, start working toward protecting incumbent Democrats and try to elect more if possible.
Electoral college defection, claiming election tampering, etc are all recipes to mobilize republicans far beyong what happenned in 10 and 14.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Those districts in question had voting by electronic tabulators. AFAIK there is NO AUDIT TRAIL.
napi21
Nov 2016
#12
They discovered in one WI county using electronic machines that there were more votes
pnwmom
Nov 2016
#25
Neither Wisconsin nor Pennsylvania came within 0.5 percent, so those are pretty much moot.
WillowTree
Nov 2016
#17
That's for an automatic or free recount. The candidate can always request a recount.
athena
Nov 2016
#18
Talk about the percentages & it sounds like tiny differences. Hard numbers tell a different story.
WillowTree
Nov 2016
#22
In the article and yes malware can be installed through the ballot printing/entry machines. no inter
Sunlei
Nov 2016
#37