General Discussion

roamer65

(36,744 posts)

45. MI uses paper ballots.

Reply to apcalc (Original post)

Wed Nov 23, 2016, 06:13 PM

Nov 2016

They are fed into a reader, so a recount would be very easy.

Last I looked, Dumps lead was down to 9000 votes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hacked election [View all] apcalc Nov 2016 OP

Rugh ro! Cats fucking fighting in the bag! Can't stop them now. lonestarnot Nov 2016 #1

Do you REALLY believe Hillary will challenge the outcome? napi21 Nov 2016 #2

She ran for the presidency. athena Nov 2016 #7

Those districts in question had voting by electronic tabulators. AFAIK there is NO AUDIT TRAIL. napi21 Nov 2016 #12

I believe athena Nov 2016 #13

They discovered in one WI county using electronic machines that there were more votes pnwmom Nov 2016 #25

This is about election rigging/padding. She's just the catalyst to make the call. ffr Nov 2016 #16

Don't think she will elmac Nov 2016 #20

It was irresponsible when Trump said it before the election loyalsister Nov 2016 #3

You can't find irrefutable evidence unless you investigate. bigmonkey Nov 2016 #4

Exactly. athena Nov 2016 #5

It's more like investigating deaths of people who drink water mythology Nov 2016 #8

How do you explain athena Nov 2016 #11

There is evidence, preliminary evidence. bigmonkey Nov 2016 #21

I'm saying don't start screaming that it happened without proof loyalsister Nov 2016 #6

No one is saying it happened. athena Nov 2016 #9

Calling for the proof to precede the investigation? bigmonkey Nov 2016 #10

Evidence is not even required for an investigation, athena Nov 2016 #14

Neither Wisconsin nor Pennsylvania came within 0.5 percent, so those are pretty much moot. WillowTree Nov 2016 #17

That's for an automatic or free recount. The candidate can always request a recount. athena Nov 2016 #18

Talk about the percentages & it sounds like tiny differences. Hard numbers tell a different story. WillowTree Nov 2016 #22

An investigation is one thing loyalsister Nov 2016 #27

Again, you are calling for the facts before the investigation. bigmonkey Nov 2016 #33

You need facts to justify an investigation loyalsister Nov 2016 #34

The hurdle for investigation is lower bigmonkey Nov 2016 #40

This is not court loyalsister Nov 2016 #42

This message was self-deleted by its author bigmonkey Nov 2016 #43

It's more court than politics. bigmonkey Nov 2016 #44

Look how smug the presumptive winner was awoke_in_2003 Nov 2016 #19

Computer faculty at Berkeley and MIT are calling for an audit of three states, pnwmom Nov 2016 #26

Do you have a link for this? forthemiddle Nov 2016 #31

In the article and yes malware can be installed through the ballot printing/entry machines. no inter Sunlei Nov 2016 #37

Will the senate seat audit that they are doing forthemiddle Nov 2016 #39

I don't know. I want machine software checked by experts & the large chunks of BLANK ballots looked Sunlei Nov 2016 #41

I think Trump was talking about himself when he said the election is rigged JonLP24 Nov 2016 #28

I know he was loyalsister Nov 2016 #29

I hardly consider voting machines conspiracy theories JonLP24 Nov 2016 #32

Was that the only option? loyalsister Nov 2016 #35

I would have to research each individual area JonLP24 Nov 2016 #36

Are those straight or flexible straws they're grasping at? WillowTree Nov 2016 #15

There is no question it was hacked. world wide wally Nov 2016 #23

KnR Hekate Nov 2016 #24

"The group apparently has no proof of hacking..." jmg257 Nov 2016 #30

because NONE of the machines are checked by anyone. Sunlei Nov 2016 #38

MI uses paper ballots. roamer65 Nov 2016 #45