HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Instead of winning over t... » Reply #58

Response to DetlefK (Original post)

Thu Dec 1, 2016, 05:38 PM

58. How about electing state and local officers who will reverse all the restrictions on voting

the GOP, ALEC and the Koch brothers have wrought on the voters. Section 4 of voting rights act was gutted in 2013 by the Supreme Court. Since then 1000's of easily accessible voting places were eliminated effecting minority and poorer communities. Ridiculous voter ID laws were put in place targeting again POC, Students, the elderly and poorer citizens. This was a systematic effort to suppress voter turnout and we saw the results of that in this election. A few thousand votes in relatively safe Democratic states determined the election in favor of the Republicans.

Voting Rights Act Section 4 Struck Down By Supreme Court
06/25/2013 10:19 am ET | Updated Jun 25, 2013

The Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act on Tuesday, the provision of the landmark civil rights law that designates which parts of the country must have changes to their voting laws cleared by the federal government or in federal court.

The 5-4 ruling, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, ruled in Shelby County v. Holder that “things have changed dramatically” in the South in the nearly 50 years since the Voting Rights Act was signed in 1965.

The court’s opinion said it did not strike down the act of Congress “lightly,” and said it “took care to avoid ruling on the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act” in a separate case back in 2009. “Congress could have updated the coverage formula at that time, but did not do so. Its failure to act leaves us today with no choice but to declare [Section 4] unconstitutional. The formula in that section can no longer be used as a basis for subjecting jurisdictions to preclearance.”

The Voting Rights Act has recently been used to block a voter ID law in Texas and delay the implementation of another in South Carolina. Both states are no longer subject to the preclearance requirement because of the court’s ruling on Tuesday.

“Our country has changed, and while any racial discrimination in voting is too much, Congress must ensure that the legislation it passes to remedy that problem speaks to current conditions,” Roberts wrote.

“There is no doubt that these improvements are in large part because of the Voting Rights Act,” he wrote. “The Act has proved immensely successful at redressing racial discrimination and integrating the voting process.”

In his bench statement, Roberts said that Congress had extended a 40-year-old coverage formula based on “obsolete statistics and that the coverage formula “violates the constitution.”

Congress, the court ruled, “may draft another formula based on current conditions.” But given the fact that Republicans currently control the House of Representatives, many voting rights advocates consider it unlikely that Congress will act to create a new formula.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 68 replies Author Time Post
DetlefK Dec 2016 OP
Grey Lemercier Dec 2016 #1
JimBeard Dec 2016 #37
putitinD Dec 2016 #2
IronLionZion Dec 2016 #14
Nancyswidower Dec 2016 #48
pansypoo53219 Dec 2016 #3
pnwmom Dec 2016 #7
vi5 Dec 2016 #26
bettyellen Dec 2016 #60
vi5 Dec 2016 #62
underpants Dec 2016 #28
Bear Creek Dec 2016 #4
TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #5
Hortensis Dec 2016 #6
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #12
Hortensis Dec 2016 #38
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #41
Hortensis Dec 2016 #49
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #52
ehrnst Dec 2016 #16
CrispyQ Dec 2016 #29
JimBeard Dec 2016 #45
Duckhunter935 Dec 2016 #8
NewJeffCT Dec 2016 #9
keithbvadu2 Dec 2016 #10
ehrnst Dec 2016 #18
JonLP24 Dec 2016 #64
keithbvadu2 Dec 2016 #67
Coolest Ranger Dec 2016 #11
Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2016 #13
ehrnst Dec 2016 #15
FailureToCommunicate Dec 2016 #19
Ligyron Dec 2016 #17
MissKat Dec 2016 #22
JHan Dec 2016 #33
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #43
JimBeard Dec 2016 #47
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #51
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #42
ChaoticSilly Dec 2016 #68
cilla4progress Dec 2016 #20
Post removed Dec 2016 #21
ehrnst Dec 2016 #31
Justice Dec 2016 #35
Martin Eden Dec 2016 #23
ehrnst Dec 2016 #32
Martin Eden Dec 2016 #36
Raster Dec 2016 #24
Bettie Dec 2016 #25
vi5 Dec 2016 #27
mcar Dec 2016 #30
ksoze Dec 2016 #34
sarisataka Dec 2016 #39
Nancyswidower Dec 2016 #46
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #50
sarisataka Dec 2016 #54
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #61
MarvinGardens Dec 2016 #65
phylny Dec 2016 #66
Oneironaut Dec 2016 #40
brooklynite Dec 2016 #44
guillaumeb Dec 2016 #53
NRQ891 Dec 2016 #55
guillaumeb Dec 2016 #56
NRQ891 Dec 2016 #57
LineReply How about electing state and local officers who will reverse all the restrictions on voting
Fla Dem Dec 2016 #58
GummyBearz Dec 2016 #59
Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #63
Please login to view edit histories.