Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
19. So, who cared so little about the troops?
Fri Feb 3, 2017, 12:33 PM
Feb 2017

Remember the troops and all the betrayals of the troops by the Obama administration? Oh, it was horrible, not sending the troops into Syria or Israel or Mexico or someplace else for ill-defined objectives, lethal risks, and dubious results. It was almost as if President Obama didn't want to waste the lives of the troops.

Well, now there's a new sheriff in town, and the troops are going to be out there blowing women, kids and houses to Kingdom Come, getting ambushed, and dying for the greater glory of President Trump. Who decided the Yemen raid was a good idea? Who approached whom: Did the Pentagon figure the new administration would be inexperienced enough not to know a bad plan when they saw it? Or did the Trump administration go fishing for a gung-ho half-baked plan in pursuit of a public relations victory?

Either way it went, someone involved didn't care about the risks, only the potential reward. President Trump couldn't even be bothered to show up in the Situation Room while William Owens was dying at his command. And why did the military originally say that no civilians had been killed in the raid? Who authorized the announcement of that lie? If this is what the White House says is a very successful operation, I'd hate to see what they would consider a failure.

I love AMJOY Gothmog Feb 2017 #1
The way that she keeps describing Bannon, braddy Feb 2017 #2
He served for 7 years 30+ years ago Lucinda Feb 2017 #4
Post removed Post removed Feb 2017 #5
He is not remotely qualified. Period. n/t Lucinda Feb 2017 #6
She should mention them nonetheless, to conceal such relevant information makes her dishonest, his braddy Feb 2017 #7
Yeah, she's going to mention his full educational history in a tweet? csziggy Feb 2017 #13
Ah yes, Joy Reid's a liar and Breitbart Bannon has impeccable credibility emulatorloo Feb 2017 #14
Exactly! Not qualified, racist, and political! Madam45for2923 Feb 2017 #10
There are tens of thousands of former junior officers with master's degrees dalton99a Feb 2017 #8
It is the specifics that make the difference, look at his wiki page, she didn't even look at wiki. braddy Feb 2017 #9
You don't know that! He was a junior officer 3 decades ago. He is a racist now! Madam45for2923 Feb 2017 #11
Bannon is a mush brained alcoholic - Anything he did know is lost now like all drunks snooper2 Feb 2017 #17
Steve Bannon fan are ya? justiceischeap Feb 2017 #12
No, I am a veteran who doesn't like deceit or ignorance about military related matters. braddy Feb 2017 #15
As a veteran do you feel YOU'RE qualified justiceischeap Feb 2017 #16
That has nothing to do with my post, which was about the misleading description that ignored his braddy Feb 2017 #18
Joy is the best, and she's working at MSNBC without a contract. She may be gone soon along with ... brush Feb 2017 #3
So, who cared so little about the troops? gratuitous Feb 2017 #19
Kicking! Madam45for2923 Feb 2017 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joy Reid on the Yemen Str...»Reply #19