Marriage vows meant nothing to scrotus so why think the constitution would (Reply #7) - Democratic Underground

Create new account | My Profile | My Account | My Bookmarks | My Inbox | Help | Log in

Home Latest Threads Greatest Threads Forums & Groups My Subscriptions My Posts

DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Oath of Office Violated? » Reply #7

In the discussion thread: Oath of Office Violated? [View all]

Response to BBG (Original post)

Sat Feb 18, 2017, 11:26 AM

BSdetect (8,841 posts)

7. Marriage vows meant nothing to scrotus so why think the constitution would

be any different?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

17 replies	Author	Time	Post
Oath of Office Violated? [View all]	BBG	Feb 2017	OP
For Republicans, the "Oath of Office" is really more of a non-binding suggestion.	Orrex	Feb 2017	#1
Then they breach the binds that tie us as a nation	BBG	Feb 2017	#2
Well, yeah	Orrex	Feb 2017	#11
Then they should be called on it.	BBG	Feb 2017	#13
If you can loan me $60K, I can probably get Toomey to take my call	Orrex	Feb 2017	#14
Mobilize and Organize	BBG	Feb 2017	#16
Same way they ignore the "Pledge of Alliegience" they so proudly banter	randr	Feb 2017	#3
They only care about the "under God" part	Orrex	Feb 2017	#12
All things are relative...	MedusaX	Feb 2017	#4
It's a very selective version of the Constitution that	MineralMan	Feb 2017	#5
He has a YUUUGE loophole...	SeattleVet	Feb 2017	#6
Cute but no cigar	BBG	Feb 2017	#9
Yes, grounds for 25th Amendment solution...	SeattleVet	Feb 2017	#15
Marriage vows meant nothing to scrotus so why think the constitution would	BSdetect	Feb 2017	#7
Unlike the marriage vows	BBG	Feb 2017	#10
Trump: "I don't know anything about the Constitution"	dalton99a	Feb 2017	#8
Guidelines...	Wounded Bear	Feb 2017	#17

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.