Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
1. Yes it would mean that.
Sat Feb 18, 2017, 04:15 PM
Feb 2017

But if one economy has literally no opportunities for all of its workers, the contribution of the unemployed is not a factor.

One example:

After NAFTA was passed, US produced and subsidized corn was cheaper in Mexico than Mexican corn. So many Mexican farmers left to find farm work in the US. This had the effect of destroying the ability of these farmers to work in Mexico as well as allowing US farmers to hire these workers at lower wages than they would pay to a US worker.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serious question about im...»Reply #1