Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
200. He himself says ...
Mon Feb 27, 2017, 02:51 AM
Feb 2017

... that he is NOT a Democrat, but an Independent.

Again, why do you not take him at his own word?

Actions speak louder than words. elleng Feb 2017 #1
Agreed ellen. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #3
They are indeed. elleng Feb 2017 #10
Just popping in to agree with this. Shandris Feb 2017 #18
A (D) behind the name means it counts when determining the Majority Party. That's important. SharonAnn Feb 2017 #126
Yes, that's important, to that extent. elleng Feb 2017 #137
That's What I Was Thinking, Too Leith Feb 2017 #187
If one wants to have a say in party politics and how it is run and control aspects of it.... boston bean Feb 2017 #2
If one judges solely by the voting record, guillaumeb Feb 2017 #5
Ditto! 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2017 #8
That is not the sole measuremen is it?? boston bean Feb 2017 #11
Agreed. And I cannot answer for Sanders' decisions. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #14
Unless you self select out. boston bean Feb 2017 #30
A nice point. eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #38
No that means he caucuses with the Democrats...you can't be a member unless you join. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #20
How is Pat Leahy a Democrat?? boston bean Feb 2017 #27
No. He refuses the label so no he is absolutely not. bravenak Feb 2017 #51
It's not a label. It's a membership. Damn he should just join... but he won't, why? boston bean Feb 2017 #94
I Have my own ideas about why and they are not nice things. bravenak Feb 2017 #95
Don't all prominent politicians love attention. sammythecat Feb 2017 #220
Voting record's count unless your name is Hillary BlueStateLib Feb 2017 #81
Manchin represents a 70% Trump state crazycatlady Feb 2017 #4
Susan Collins votes with the GOP about 80% of the time. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #7
And I'm sure the tea party talks about primarying her crazycatlady Feb 2017 #19
Agreed. But for some reason, some states respect non-lockstep politicians. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #29
Maine is pretty unique in that way crazycatlady Feb 2017 #42
She is a member of the GOP...so she is a GOP. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #23
One hopes that Trump might convince Collins to switch parties. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #33
Neither because your choices are utterly inaccurate mythology Feb 2017 #34
She is a Republican. She caucuses with the GOP. wildeyed Feb 2017 #68
And Sanders caucuses with the Democrats. eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #96
But declares as an Independent. wildeyed Feb 2017 #154
Should the focus be on the label, or the position? eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #163
Depends. wildeyed Feb 2017 #174
I am talking about Sanders, but this is applicable to Kshama Sawant and others guillaumeb Feb 2017 #180
According to my new definition, wildeyed Feb 2017 #188
Your definition is a good one. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #189
insightful , thanks +++ JHan Feb 2017 #196
and numbers matter in determining who controls Congress still_one Feb 2017 #9
Right, I'll take the most liberal democrat that we can elect in each state. Salviati Feb 2017 #75
+1 treestar Feb 2017 #130
Except that the 25% might include a critical vote on ACA, for instance. alarimer Feb 2017 #146
Your example is fine for a state such as Vermont, or New York, or California, but still_one Feb 2017 #6
How then does a Democratic Senator like Manchin get elected in a red state? guillaumeb Feb 2017 #12
President Obama has never won West Virginia. SaschaHM Feb 2017 #13
My mistake. You are correct. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #16
It used to be blue...then more purple ...we are lucky to get Manchin...and he is endangered... Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #25
It was blue when Robert Byrd was a Senator. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #35
What I am talking about is why Dean's 50 state strategy was so successful still_one Feb 2017 #36
Tailoring the message to each particular state? guillaumeb Feb 2017 #41
exactly still_one Feb 2017 #52
We weren't purists. We had conservative democrats. boston bean Feb 2017 #53
Having a Democrat that's liked in a red state radical noodle Feb 2017 #78
When is comes to party matters, yes. Sanders, by his own choice, is an Independent. SaschaHM Feb 2017 #15
I agree. And given that he votes with the Democrats nearly all of the time, guillaumeb Feb 2017 #21
No...he should join the party if he wants to have a say in how it is run. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #32
Of course, they have to keep Bernie happy. SaschaHM Feb 2017 #40
Yep Go Vols Feb 2017 #175
No Bernie Sanders is an independent...and that sends a message. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #17
Does it send a message that Independents are natural Democrats? guillaumeb Feb 2017 #24
It is not that hard...some will never get elected in a red state Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #37
Agreed. The 50 state strategy in action. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #97
They campaign hard and get more votes. wildeyed Feb 2017 #71
If you want to lecture others on how to be a Democrat... theglammistress Feb 2017 #22
Some hear a lecture, others hear good advice. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #26
I hear a lecture and division in Bernie's words. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #39
What sort of message do you suppose Bernie sends by refusing to join? Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #46
his message is that he does not care what you think he should do. ciaobaby Feb 2017 #85
Is that a positive unifying message? Wil that help take down Trump? nt Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #89
This is an irrelevant comparison. mythology Feb 2017 #28
True. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #50
The "measure" is BEING a Democrat ... NanceGreggs Feb 2017 #84
His voting record is one of supporting Democratic Party positions 90+% of the time. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #99
What is a Democrat Nance? KPN Feb 2017 #139
Being an actual member ... NanceGreggs Feb 2017 #155
You are making stuff up now. I haven't seen anyone say Bernie KPN Feb 2017 #199
He himself says ... NanceGreggs Feb 2017 #200
I do. If he said otherwise I'd feel the way the way I did about KPN Feb 2017 #203
Yes, they align with the Party. NanceGreggs Feb 2017 #204
I guess I just don't see it as lecturing. KPN Feb 2017 #215
If the party is nothing more than a clique, like the one in Heathers, QC Feb 2017 #31
Agreed. eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #43
It is an organization with members who decide to join and those who don't are not Democrats. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #44
The Comparison To "Heathers"..... LovingA2andMI Feb 2017 #65
It's an organization BainsBane Feb 2017 #73
It's what it has become. Just team sports. alarimer Feb 2017 #147
The "D" is a rough, mostly reliabe, guide. Rule: Just about any Dem is better than any Repuke. UTUSN Feb 2017 #45
Absolutley... Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #48
No doubt. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #55
Yes it is Progressive dog Feb 2017 #47
But is the 98% voter more of a tem member than the 75% voter? guillaumeb Feb 2017 #56
It's not about how someone votes Progressive dog Feb 2017 #60
Leading to the next question: guillaumeb Feb 2017 #62
He is the one to answer that question. BainsBane Feb 2017 #72
It should be about how one votes. ciaobaby Feb 2017 #87
What is important is true representation of their constituents Cary Feb 2017 #49
True, and working with like minded political colleagues to get things done. eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #58
An (R) behind the name is certainly a deal breaker. DuckBurp Feb 2017 #54
True, but that is because there are no sane GOP politicians in Congress. eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #59
Manchin represents a particular constituency. lapucelle Feb 2017 #57
But his voting record makes it clear that he is a Democrat, guillaumeb Feb 2017 #61
His voting record (for the most part) aligns with Democrats, lapucelle Feb 2017 #64
I vote for people, not letters bekkilyn Feb 2017 #63
+1 ciaobaby Feb 2017 #86
Agreed. I have never found a GOP politician to support, guillaumeb Feb 2017 #100
I support Democrats. I vote to elect Democrats. I donate to Democrats. NurseJackie Feb 2017 #66
So the voting record counts for nothing? guillaumeb Feb 2017 #102
It doesn't give someone Carte Blanche to run roughshod and start calling the shots... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #109
I do not have this in mind at all. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #115
Huh? Co-chair? WTF?! There's NO SUCH THING as "co-chair" ... they are NOT equals. NurseJackie Feb 2017 #124
It means........ guillaumeb Feb 2017 #127
There's no such thing as the "Sanders Wing". They're either Democrats or not... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #133
Do you see the Democratic Party as a monolith? guillaumeb Feb 2017 #134
I believe that's called a strawman argument. I've never said or suggested such a thing ... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #138
Constructing your own straw man? guillaumeb Feb 2017 #159
He's the one saying it himself. Just listen to his own words. NurseJackie Feb 2017 #178
He is offering an opinion, and advice. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #183
Unsolicited advice. The worst and most unappreciated... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #195
Obviously unsolicited by you. But the DNC is listening. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #210
This isn't about me. And, the #2 slot is a consolation prize of little authority. NurseJackie Feb 2017 #216
Let us really simplify the issue here: The Democrats are losing the battle. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #219
Naturally you'd say that to avoid uncomfortable facts. NurseJackie Feb 2017 #222
Avoidance as in how you are avoiding how Democrats have steadily guillaumeb Feb 2017 #226
Keith was not your magic-bullet. He didn't have superhuman powers. NurseJackie Feb 2017 #231
An interesting response. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #233
See above. NurseJackie Feb 2017 #234
Sound xenophobic actually. KPN Feb 2017 #140
Really? How so? To what other parties should I consider giving control of the Democratic party? NurseJackie Feb 2017 #144
How so? KPN Feb 2017 #149
Oh brother! NurseJackie Feb 2017 #150
And you are just an innocent bystander with nothing but KPN Feb 2017 #153
I'll take you at your word that you are a "lifelong Democrat" ... and therefore NurseJackie Feb 2017 #156
Oh spare me the psychological analysis. KPN Feb 2017 #202
Well... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #206
You conveniently ignored my implied admission that "offended" was perhaps an inaccurate KPN Feb 2017 #221
Okay. See ya 'round. NurseJackie Feb 2017 #223
I don't understand your question. wildeyed Feb 2017 #67
Well said. BainsBane Feb 2017 #74
So True ! ciaobaby Feb 2017 #88
And if we need all coalition members, guillaumeb Feb 2017 #103
Sanders and his supporters need to learn to work within the party framework wildeyed Feb 2017 #158
This: guillaumeb Feb 2017 #164
No. It reflects the nature of the electorate in West Virginia. wildeyed Feb 2017 #176
I have driven through numerous times. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #182
The Democrat who motivates that block is not 'progressive'. wildeyed Feb 2017 #193
When we drove through, the views from the Byrd highway were spectacular. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #208
The problem is, they vote for the ruined land and rich owners. wildeyed Feb 2017 #224
On a personal note: guillaumeb Feb 2017 #228
Apparently it is for some. truebluegreen Feb 2017 #69
It depends what the context is BainsBane Feb 2017 #70
To your "key difference" point: guillaumeb Feb 2017 #104
He's representing his constituents BainsBane Feb 2017 #116
Agreed on the DNC example. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #117
debate about policy BainsBane Feb 2017 #152
But the corporate media much prefers a focus on personality. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #162
I agree completely. JNelson6563 Feb 2017 #76
Sanders is adamant JustAnotherGen Feb 2017 #77
To regain the majority, the "D is more important. Yes, someties I'd like to see the Dems vote in napi21 Feb 2017 #79
There's a good deal more to a pol than voting record. Consider also: TygrBright Feb 2017 #80
Agreed. Nice additions to the conversation. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #106
In general, I agree with this. BobTheSubgenius Feb 2017 #82
Agreed. eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #108
Cognitive Dissonance: EffieBlack Feb 2017 #83
Two different issues. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #110
a vote trumps all madokie Feb 2017 #90
Nope, it doesn't. It's actually weaker than the symbolic act of not joining. Because it influences stevenleser Feb 2017 #92
Bull madokie Feb 2017 #93
And that response is indicative you have no counter, so its an acknowledgement that I'm right. nt stevenleser Feb 2017 #101
Man o man madokie Feb 2017 #118
So when manchin voted for 2 Trump cabinet nominees. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #112
Nope. Presidential nominees are usually approved. stevenleser Feb 2017 #122
And given that nearly all of the Democratic Senators voted one way, guillaumeb Feb 2017 #125
Not in my mind it doesn't madokie Feb 2017 #119
Agreed. eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #111
Peace madokie Feb 2017 #120
Since you asked, both are important. stevenleser Feb 2017 #91
Exactly this. Good post. DanTex Feb 2017 #98
How is this "symbolic action" different from another Senator guillaumeb Feb 2017 #113
It means that? Really? KPN Feb 2017 #141
Churchill to FDR: "Fuck off! We don't need allies!" ret5hd Feb 2017 #105
Nice observation. eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #114
NOPE Faux pas Feb 2017 #107
Committee memberships are detemined by the majority party. meadowlander Feb 2017 #121
The Democrats need voters to come out and vote. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #128
Thread after thread stating essentially that we should like Sanders. We don't. randome Feb 2017 #123
The pronouns "you" and "we" are not identical. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #129
Apples and Oranges... Blue Idaho Feb 2017 #131
But both Sanders and Manchin support Democratic positions. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #132
Absolutely! Blue Idaho Feb 2017 #151
A great post. eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #161
Thanks! Blue Idaho Feb 2017 #171
No. But it sure seems like a lot of folks feel that way, no? KPN Feb 2017 #135
If you have read this post, or many similarly themed posts, guillaumeb Feb 2017 #136
Thanks. Missed that post. KPN Feb 2017 #142
A sleeping giant that could be the link between the Party, guillaumeb Feb 2017 #160
Just checking ... You do understand that they are not "co-chairs", right? You kinda ... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #148
The voting totals were quite close. Indicating that the Party is supportive of both. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #167
It wasn't that close. The same proportions in a national election would be ... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #181
You claim that it was not that close. Reality says otherwise. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #185
You're giving it more significance ... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #194
No, you are denying the significance. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #209
Now you're just being contrary for its own sake. NurseJackie Feb 2017 #213
Both matter IMHO Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2017 #143
No. alarimer Feb 2017 #145
The D behind the names shows investment in a political party one we have all signed up at DU La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2017 #157
If Sanders spent all of his time criticizing, I would agree. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #165
no one is arguing that Sanders is not liberal. what we are arguing is whether he furthers La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2017 #166
Agreed. I am not defending everything that Sanders says, or everything that any guillaumeb Feb 2017 #168
glad we are agreed La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2017 #169
And I also. I respect your positions, and your (generally) polite style. eom guillaumeb Feb 2017 #170
i dunno about the polite. i have been raging quite a bit since the election La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2017 #172
Raging is one thing. Being insulting to others is another. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #173
Call me when Vermont and W. Va. become ideologically equivalent. Until then, it doesn't.... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2017 #177
A coal state, but not simply a coal state. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #184
Oh yeah, the "maple sugar" lobby in DC is huge & they have buckets of money to throw at our.... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2017 #198
Maple sugar loses out to southern subsidized cane sugar. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #211
Well, alrighty then! Tarheel_Dem Feb 2017 #227
Apples and Oranges. NanceGreggs Feb 2017 #179
Your end point might be a valid one if Sanders were criticizing a winning strategy. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #186
And what "winning strategy" ... NanceGreggs Feb 2017 #190
A whole different argument that (probably) neither of us wishes to visit. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #191
I think it's a very relevant argument. NanceGreggs Feb 2017 #192
It might be relevant but to discuss it would then involve the various claims guillaumeb Feb 2017 #207
It didn't used to but it does now, with the parties so far apart. pnwmom Feb 2017 #197
No Alice11111 Feb 2017 #201
If Sanders had the W VA electorate he'd be voting more like Manchin or he'd be gone. delisen Feb 2017 #205
That is speculation. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #212
If we're going for a "Fifty State" strategy, we have to consider the (D) for some states. moriah Feb 2017 #214
Tom Cotton? My sympathies moriah. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #229
Thanks for your sympathies. moriah Feb 2017 #232
Only the votes matter. lagomorph777 Feb 2017 #217
Overall and almost always, yes. All D's are much better than all R's across the board. nt. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #218
Manchin and Sanders are two very different people Blue_Tires Feb 2017 #225
They are. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #230
Yes-control of committees and congress are very important matters Gothmog Feb 2017 #235
Support for the platform is also very important. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #236
You cannot investigate or control the agenda without a majority Gothmog Feb 2017 #237
Mitch McConnell said it well: guillaumeb Feb 2017 #238
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is the (D) behind the nam...»Reply #200