Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

calimary

(81,220 posts)
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 05:00 PM Jun 2012

OMG! I called it! Didn't realize it at the time. I nailed it on that adult three-year-old, scalia! [View all]

Last edited Thu Jun 28, 2012, 07:40 PM - Edit history (1)

Most interesting point. Watching his behavior lately is like watching a five-year-old throwing a

temper tantrum in the cereal aisle at the grocery store. He seems SUPER pissed about something. His ego can't take it when he's unable to steer the court his particular way? Another manifestation of the republi-CON "Sore Loserman"? I don't know.

From this thread by DUer spanone:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002865198

Remember earlier this week, when scalia was acting out, throwing this hissy-fit after the Arizona "papers please" law was mostly struck down (against his majesty's wishes)? And everyone was talking about his belligerent behavior, yowling about it from the bench, and acting like a pissed-off diva?

Made me wonder if he was pissed off because he wasn't able to drive the court his way, as he mostly does for the CON point of view, and his ego was knocked WAY outta joint. Usually, with the force of his personality and his in-yer-face "fat tony" mafioso schtick that I'm CERTAIN he uses to bully the court, he's able to influence the outcome of many rulings. And he failed this time - not once with the Arizona bullshit but also with this. And he knew it in advance even though this one today wasn't released to the public yet. So he was acting out.

I just had this suspicion, observing his spoiled snot-nose behavior, that he was dreadfully pissed off about something. Undoubtedly it was this. Judging from the way he was misbehaving, he CLEARLY had wanted those rulings, especially the public "insult" and repudiation of HIS side of things on the health care issue, to go another way.

It was tell-tale about something. But I didn't realize it was THIS.

Well, how 'bout that? The good guys win one - and a BIG one, too.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OMG! I called it! Didn't ...