Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FBI has FISA warrant for Trump secret server connected to Russia. [View all]GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)47. They can't officially confirm a FISA warrant in an ongoing investigation
So, they haven't. But it has been leaked. The BBC has confirmed that.
Here's the Beeb:
Trump 'compromising' claims: How and why did we get here?
Last April, the CIA director was shown intelligence that worried him. It was - allegedly - a tape recording of a conversation about money from the Kremlin going into the US presidential campaign.
It was passed to the US by an intelligence agency of one of the Baltic States. The CIA cannot act domestically against American citizens so a joint counter-intelligence taskforce was created.
The taskforce included six agencies or departments of government. Dealing with the domestic, US, side of the inquiry, were the FBI, the Department of the Treasury, and the Department of Justice. For the foreign and intelligence aspects of the investigation, there were another three agencies: the CIA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the National Security Agency, responsible for electronic spying.
Lawyers from the National Security Division in the Department of Justice then drew up an application. They took it to the secret US court that deals with intelligence, the Fisa court, named after the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. They wanted permission to intercept the electronic records from two Russian banks.
Their first application, in June, was rejected outright by the judge. They returned with a more narrowly drawn order in July and were rejected again. Finally, before a new judge, the order was granted, on 15 October, three weeks before election day.
Last April, the CIA director was shown intelligence that worried him. It was - allegedly - a tape recording of a conversation about money from the Kremlin going into the US presidential campaign.
It was passed to the US by an intelligence agency of one of the Baltic States. The CIA cannot act domestically against American citizens so a joint counter-intelligence taskforce was created.
The taskforce included six agencies or departments of government. Dealing with the domestic, US, side of the inquiry, were the FBI, the Department of the Treasury, and the Department of Justice. For the foreign and intelligence aspects of the investigation, there were another three agencies: the CIA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the National Security Agency, responsible for electronic spying.
Lawyers from the National Security Division in the Department of Justice then drew up an application. They took it to the secret US court that deals with intelligence, the Fisa court, named after the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. They wanted permission to intercept the electronic records from two Russian banks.
Their first application, in June, was rejected outright by the judge. They returned with a more narrowly drawn order in July and were rejected again. Finally, before a new judge, the order was granted, on 15 October, three weeks before election day.
And from the Guardian:
Why James Clapper's Trump comments may not conflict with reports of secret court order
The News Corp-owned Heat Street news site and later the BBC published reports in November and January respectively that a secret surveillance order had been issued by a special court allowing the justice department to investigate two Russian banks suspected of being part of the Kremlins efforts to hurt Hillary Clintons campaign and aid Trumps.
The BBC said the justice department request had originally been based on a tip-off from an intelligence agency in one of the Baltic states, saying that the banks were being used to channel Kremlin money into the US presidential campaign.
Both reports said the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Fisa) court gave permission in mid-October for monitoring of the activities of the two banks that also covered Trump associates.
The News Corp-owned Heat Street news site and later the BBC published reports in November and January respectively that a secret surveillance order had been issued by a special court allowing the justice department to investigate two Russian banks suspected of being part of the Kremlins efforts to hurt Hillary Clintons campaign and aid Trumps.
The BBC said the justice department request had originally been based on a tip-off from an intelligence agency in one of the Baltic states, saying that the banks were being used to channel Kremlin money into the US presidential campaign.
Both reports said the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Fisa) court gave permission in mid-October for monitoring of the activities of the two banks that also covered Trump associates.
Louise reported it on Nov. 7, 2016. The BBC followed on Jan. 27, 2017.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
THIS is the kind of headline that should be splashed across every news outlet
L. Coyote
Mar 2017
#10
I have been reflecting on this since you posted the discussion & the hack on DU on election night
Pachamama
Mar 2017
#11
I suspect there is an investigation still in progress. Anyway, oddly we haven't heard much
L. Coyote
Mar 2017
#12
Because hackers took down the entire domain! Otherwise, the whole country might have seen it.
L. Coyote
Mar 2017
#15
yes, David Corn (Mother Jones) reported on it like a week before the election
Fast Walker 52
Mar 2017
#25
OK, I looked back at the article. It doesn't mention surveillance of Trump tower.
Fast Walker 52
Mar 2017
#50
Or DU could build a massive firewall and ask another web site to pay for it
Generic Brad
Mar 2017
#54
Classic case: Man with "Republicans Against Trump" sign beaten at Trump rally, Trump incited fight
L. Coyote
Mar 2017
#35
Pay closer attention, instead of creating fake facts, disinformation, and character assassination
L. Coyote
Mar 2017
#46
There is more to this than what you see. Do some research and find something interesting for us
L. Coyote
Mar 2017
#49
I recommend folllowing Louise Mensch on Twitter and following the #TrumpRussia hashtag.
L. Coyote
Mar 2017
#44