Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
47. They can't officially confirm a FISA warrant in an ongoing investigation
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 03:31 PM
Mar 2017

So, they haven't. But it has been leaked. The BBC has confirmed that.

Here's the Beeb:

Trump 'compromising' claims: How and why did we get here?

Last April, the CIA director was shown intelligence that worried him. It was - allegedly - a tape recording of a conversation about money from the Kremlin going into the US presidential campaign.

It was passed to the US by an intelligence agency of one of the Baltic States. The CIA cannot act domestically against American citizens so a joint counter-intelligence taskforce was created.

The taskforce included six agencies or departments of government. Dealing with the domestic, US, side of the inquiry, were the FBI, the Department of the Treasury, and the Department of Justice. For the foreign and intelligence aspects of the investigation, there were another three agencies: the CIA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the National Security Agency, responsible for electronic spying.

Lawyers from the National Security Division in the Department of Justice then drew up an application. They took it to the secret US court that deals with intelligence, the Fisa court, named after the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. They wanted permission to intercept the electronic records from two Russian banks.

Their first application, in June, was rejected outright by the judge. They returned with a more narrowly drawn order in July and were rejected again. Finally, before a new judge, the order was granted, on 15 October, three weeks before election day.

And from the Guardian:

Why James Clapper's Trump comments may not conflict with reports of secret court order

The News Corp-owned Heat Street news site and later the BBC published reports in November and January respectively that a secret surveillance order had been issued by a special court allowing the justice department to investigate two Russian banks suspected of being part of the Kremlin’s efforts to hurt Hillary Clinton’s campaign and aid Trump’s.

The BBC said the justice department request had originally been based on a tip-off from an intelligence agency in one of the Baltic states, saying that the banks were being used to channel Kremlin money into the US presidential campaign.

Both reports said the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Fisa) court gave permission in mid-October for monitoring of the activities of the two banks that also covered Trump associates.


Louise reported it on Nov. 7, 2016. The BBC followed on Jan. 27, 2017.
Freaking wow! malaise Mar 2017 #1
Indeed. Election morning, bright and early. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #3
I've been watching view counts malaise Mar 2017 #4
EXACTLY!!!! SummerSnow Mar 2017 #8
The other shoe is starting to fall. lpbk2713 Mar 2017 #2
I wanna see horizontal stripes! KPN Mar 2017 #5
Lex Luthor? Moostache Mar 2017 #14
and bald. barbtries Mar 2017 #17
They shave traitors' heads, too. n/t murielm99 Mar 2017 #19
even in 2017? barbtries Mar 2017 #30
It is a tradition. murielm99 Mar 2017 #32
yeah. barbtries Mar 2017 #33
very interesting. Thanks. n/t yodermon Mar 2017 #6
KICK! furtheradu Mar 2017 #7
Thanks JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #9
THIS is the kind of headline that should be splashed across every news outlet L. Coyote Mar 2017 #10
I have been reflecting on this since you posted the discussion & the hack on DU on election night Pachamama Mar 2017 #11
I suspect there is an investigation still in progress. Anyway, oddly we haven't heard much L. Coyote Mar 2017 #12
Holy shit--how did I not see that original thread?!? Orrex Mar 2017 #13
Because hackers took down the entire domain! Otherwise, the whole country might have seen it. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #15
Oh, yeah. Dammit. Orrex Mar 2017 #28
NOt following; what posts go back to 1969? Where are you seeing that? Amaryllis Mar 2017 #23
At the very bottom of the thread Orrex Mar 2017 #27
was it vanity fair? Slate, Mother Jones, DU itself? barbtries Mar 2017 #16
yes, David Corn (Mother Jones) reported on it like a week before the election Fast Walker 52 Mar 2017 #25
thank you! barbtries Mar 2017 #31
Corn never mentioned a FISA warrant in his Oct. 31 piece. GliderGuider Mar 2017 #45
OK, I looked back at the article. It doesn't mention surveillance of Trump tower. Fast Walker 52 Mar 2017 #50
DU should build a backup site on another platform for just such emergencies ffr Mar 2017 #18
Or DU could build a massive firewall and ask another web site to pay for it Generic Brad Mar 2017 #54
I wondered keepthemhonestO Mar 2017 #20
It was good to revisit that thread. murielm99 Mar 2017 #21
Well done and well played. NCTraveler Mar 2017 #22
I wish someone would do some research on the Russian trolls and bots JPZenger Mar 2017 #24
Classic case: Man with "Republicans Against Trump" sign beaten at Trump rally, Trump incited fight L. Coyote Mar 2017 #35
It wasn't Secret Service rushing trump off stage. Recognize this guy? L. Coyote Mar 2017 #39
KICK! Again! furtheradu Mar 2017 #26
Commie/Comey tiptonic Mar 2017 #29
Wow, first posted in November, Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2017 #34
Obviously, you are not listening to the hearing today. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #36
I was listening. Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2017 #40
I'm still watching. The DNC hack details are now being discussed. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #42
Well, the only person who has mentioned the FISA warrant Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2017 #43
Pay closer attention, instead of creating fake facts, disinformation, and character assassination L. Coyote Mar 2017 #46
FISA MedusaX Mar 2017 #51
Exactly. Plus, the server wasn't in Trump Tower, it was in another state. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #52
The Guardian and the BBC corroborated. Have you been napping? n/t pnwmom Mar 2017 #37
I only see links to Heat St. Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2017 #41
Check my post right below this. I give the BBC link. nt GliderGuider Mar 2017 #48
There is more to this than what you see. Do some research and find something interesting for us L. Coyote Mar 2017 #49
They can't officially confirm a FISA warrant in an ongoing investigation GliderGuider Mar 2017 #47
Have you read her blog, Patribotics? She has some interesting work there. n/t pnwmom Mar 2017 #38
I recommend folllowing Louise Mensch on Twitter and following the #TrumpRussia hashtag. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #44
Just now, Roger stone is trending #1 on my Twitter feed. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #53
Is Trump the Swiftboat Admiral? L. Coyote Mar 2017 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FBI has FISA warrant for ...»Reply #47