Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
8. well definitely the GOP is behaving very badly, as is typical for them
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 07:03 PM
Apr 2017

and McConnell will likely just go nuclear without the proper justification

If it comes down to "respect" for a rule . . . gratuitous Apr 2017 #1
well definitely the GOP is behaving very badly, as is typical for them Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #8
How did we do it to stop the obstruction of Obama justices? Eliot Rosewater Apr 2017 #2
the idea is that what the GOP did in 2013 was unconstitutional-- blocking all those judges Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #4
I meant how did we get 2/3 to change the rule? Eliot Rosewater Apr 2017 #5
Right, accoridng to the piece we used a simple majority but had a justification Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #7
Thing is SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2017 #10
that's true, but that's how the Senate rule is constructed. The key question is whether McConnell Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #12
what "constitutional right" to mount a filibuster? onenote Apr 2017 #18
This is only one person's opinion (Burt Neuborne) red dog 1 Apr 2017 #3
obviously McConnell could be an ass, and probably will be. The main point was that the Dems Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #6
I'm going to ask what may be a very stupid question, but here goes ProudLib72 Apr 2017 #9
It's not stupid... so in this case, it would be McConnell, and almost certainly he will claim Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #11
Can a case be made in court that might be settled by the Supremes? Vinca Apr 2017 #13
These are more Senate procedures than Federal law, but who knows Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #14
So apparently Federal courts can rule on Congressional procedures Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #15
So there's crumb of hope. Vinca Apr 2017 #16
not if Gorsuch is one of them. Amaryllis Apr 2017 #17
No. The Court will not intervene in a question that concerns Senate rules onenote Apr 2017 #19
Anyway, it's all moot now, the GOP nuked it, as basically predicted Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No nuclear option? 2/3 ma...»Reply #8