Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GeoWilliam750

(2,521 posts)
4. Always allow for extra time transiting through Canada for the US
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 06:04 AM
Apr 2017

Typically, one clears immigration and customs at the Canadian airport rather than in the US, and these can be chaotic. A connection of less than three hours could be tight - although would depend on time of day, etc.

Punching that guy and dragging him out is an "established procedure" of United Airlines? Got it. DetlefK Apr 2017 #1
It was airport security that did that bit. cab67 Apr 2017 #15
United CEO says airline had to 're-accommodate' passenger, and people are having a riot Cha Apr 2017 #2
I feel the same way, Cha. WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #11
Well said, WePurrsevere! The CEO Cha Apr 2017 #12
Your CEO response would have been a much better way to handle this, Cha. WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #17
I WAS a United frequent flyer... Raster Apr 2017 #29
One DIL and my BlueMTexpat Apr 2017 #3
Always allow for extra time transiting through Canada for the US GeoWilliam750 Apr 2017 #4
Thanks for that information. BlueMTexpat Apr 2017 #39
The attack Chinese guy flight was not United metal, so to call it United is meaningless HoneyBadger Apr 2017 #26
Different airlines treat people BlueMTexpat Apr 2017 #38
My dream of revenge... GetRidOfThem Apr 2017 #5
He may be right FBaggins Apr 2017 #6
Actually, they likely broke the law rpannier Apr 2017 #8
There's little evidence of that FBaggins Apr 2017 #9
In what Orwellian universe... kirby Apr 2017 #32
Nobody said that he was voluntarily bumped FBaggins Apr 2017 #33
Your wording confused to me kirby Apr 2017 #34
He talks about a 'denial of boarding' process; but the victim had already boarded muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #18
I don't know, but I suspect that you'll find that "boarding" doesn't end until the door closes FBaggins Apr 2017 #23
Here's their contract; "board" doesn't get a special definition muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #24
That wouldn't be true if the term were defined elsewhere FBaggins Apr 2017 #25
Found other examples FBaggins Apr 2017 #27
I'd like to see the technical manual giving that definition, then muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #28
Airlines are supposed to go out of their way to avoid involuntary geek tragedy Apr 2017 #31
Actually... they likely did and most people are unaware why or how rpannier Apr 2017 #7
What evidence is there that they broke the law? whopis01 Apr 2017 #13
From Reuters rpannier Apr 2017 #40
So that sounds like they followed the law then whopis01 Apr 2017 #41
There's a significant difference in the wording.... WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #21
Lie-ability bucolic_frolic Apr 2017 #10
yeah the public statement issued was the nail in their coffin sounds like Trump wrote it lol luvMIdog Apr 2017 #14
That was my first thought as well! It starts at the top ecstatic Apr 2017 #20
Bring 'em to their knees HAB911 Apr 2017 #16
"We fly right" DFW Apr 2017 #19
With this behavior I'd say it's more "We Fly Reich". nt WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #22
Wow! Consumer beware TNLib Apr 2017 #30
$600 million wiped off UAL market capitalization after "established procedures" and standing behind JTFrog Apr 2017 #35
I hope there is a boycott - 270 million views and more than 150,000 comments in China yesterday dalton99a Apr 2017 #36
The corporate pathocracy reigns ! Corporate ponerology in all its glory ! Joe Chi Minh Apr 2017 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»United CEO letter to empl...»Reply #4