Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WePurrsevere

(24,259 posts)
21. There's a significant difference in the wording....
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 08:59 AM
Apr 2017

that I see being overlooked. Both in the law you linked to and the United regulations someone posted elsewhere on DU. Both use pre-boarding wording like "denied boarding" at the link. These customers were all already on board and settled in.

When you fly you sort of expect that being bumped is a possibility but once you're ON the plane you have a reasonable expectation that, unless there's a safety/security problem with the plane itself or 'act of god', you're probably going to get where you're going and certainly not going to be abused and dragged off.

The fact that the badly abused doctor was Asian raises other concerns that should be looked into as well. I've read that a computer supposedly chose which passengers but if I was a juror on what I'm fairly sure will end up in court I'd want more proof that it was done w/o prejudice.

Punching that guy and dragging him out is an "established procedure" of United Airlines? Got it. DetlefK Apr 2017 #1
It was airport security that did that bit. cab67 Apr 2017 #15
United CEO says airline had to 're-accommodate' passenger, and people are having a riot Cha Apr 2017 #2
I feel the same way, Cha. WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #11
Well said, WePurrsevere! The CEO Cha Apr 2017 #12
Your CEO response would have been a much better way to handle this, Cha. WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #17
I WAS a United frequent flyer... Raster Apr 2017 #29
One DIL and my BlueMTexpat Apr 2017 #3
Always allow for extra time transiting through Canada for the US GeoWilliam750 Apr 2017 #4
Thanks for that information. BlueMTexpat Apr 2017 #39
The attack Chinese guy flight was not United metal, so to call it United is meaningless HoneyBadger Apr 2017 #26
Different airlines treat people BlueMTexpat Apr 2017 #38
My dream of revenge... GetRidOfThem Apr 2017 #5
He may be right FBaggins Apr 2017 #6
Actually, they likely broke the law rpannier Apr 2017 #8
There's little evidence of that FBaggins Apr 2017 #9
In what Orwellian universe... kirby Apr 2017 #32
Nobody said that he was voluntarily bumped FBaggins Apr 2017 #33
Your wording confused to me kirby Apr 2017 #34
He talks about a 'denial of boarding' process; but the victim had already boarded muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #18
I don't know, but I suspect that you'll find that "boarding" doesn't end until the door closes FBaggins Apr 2017 #23
Here's their contract; "board" doesn't get a special definition muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #24
That wouldn't be true if the term were defined elsewhere FBaggins Apr 2017 #25
Found other examples FBaggins Apr 2017 #27
I'd like to see the technical manual giving that definition, then muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #28
Airlines are supposed to go out of their way to avoid involuntary geek tragedy Apr 2017 #31
Actually... they likely did and most people are unaware why or how rpannier Apr 2017 #7
What evidence is there that they broke the law? whopis01 Apr 2017 #13
From Reuters rpannier Apr 2017 #40
So that sounds like they followed the law then whopis01 Apr 2017 #41
There's a significant difference in the wording.... WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #21
Lie-ability bucolic_frolic Apr 2017 #10
yeah the public statement issued was the nail in their coffin sounds like Trump wrote it lol luvMIdog Apr 2017 #14
That was my first thought as well! It starts at the top ecstatic Apr 2017 #20
Bring 'em to their knees HAB911 Apr 2017 #16
"We fly right" DFW Apr 2017 #19
With this behavior I'd say it's more "We Fly Reich". nt WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #22
Wow! Consumer beware TNLib Apr 2017 #30
$600 million wiped off UAL market capitalization after "established procedures" and standing behind JTFrog Apr 2017 #35
I hope there is a boycott - 270 million views and more than 150,000 comments in China yesterday dalton99a Apr 2017 #36
The corporate pathocracy reigns ! Corporate ponerology in all its glory ! Joe Chi Minh Apr 2017 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»United CEO letter to empl...»Reply #21