Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(51,518 posts)
34. So you care about the facts?
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 05:14 AM
Apr 2017

Your Politico piece notes in MI "the UAW flaked on GOTV commitments in the final days, and that AFSCME never even made any, despite months of appeals." A lot of people, smart politically adept people, assumed she was doing fine and did not require heroic measures. That's what the polls said. Hillary herself did campaign in MI.

To ignore what truly killed her in the last days, namely the unanticipated disaster that was Comey's release of that letter, is to be much more akin to climate change deniers than anyone in Hillary's campaign. Ignorance is indeed ignorance.

Unlike the effect of Russian interference on the 2016 presidential campaign, the effect—in votes—of the now-infamous “Comey Letter” is knowable. 

While various media outlets downplayed the effect at the time, the hard data is unmistakable: according to a Politico/Morning Consult poll taken immediately after FBI Director Comey’s end-of-October announcement that the FBI would be reviewing additional evidence in the Clinton email-server case, one-third of likely voters reported that the revelation made them “much less likely” to vote for Clinton. 

In an election Clinton lost by just 77,143 combined votes in three states—out of well over 136 million votes cast—this sort of polling data is one indication that Comey’s announcement could have cost Clinton millions of votes nationwide. But looking inside the Politico/Morning Consult data, we find much more evidence for that conclusion: specifically, the fact that while 26% of the poll’s 33% figure comes from Trump voters, the remaining 7% comes from those reporting to be Clinton voters. 

So it’s clear the Comey Letter was more than enough—as a matter of math—to put Trump in the White House.
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bigger-than-watergate-concerns-grow-that-anti-clinton_us_5850bb12e4b0b662c2fddebc



Hillary did add additional campaign stops in MI and other battleground states in those final days when she saw how much damage the letter was doing. http://amp.usatoday.com/story/93356788/ But the damage was too much to overcome in the few days she had left. Comey's letter was the perfect sabotage.
Can't wait to read it. Kath2 Apr 2017 #1
Yes, she was attacked from all sides. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #2
This DURHAM D Apr 2017 #3
2016 is a reminder that both fascists and communists are bad people. Dawson Leery Apr 2017 #4
At the publisher's website lapucelle Apr 2017 #5
She was unqualified in the sense that she didn't campaign in WI or MI... Cooley Hurd Apr 2017 #6
I believe jehop61 Apr 2017 #7
Yep. Like I said, she was attacked from all sides. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #10
OFFS. She sure as fuck did campaign in MI. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #9
Thank you for posting this. Every time I see that stupid lie about her not campaigning I betsuni Apr 2017 #19
Self reflection? truthaddict247 Apr 2017 #32
See my response to your duplicate post below. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #35
this is false uponit7771 Apr 2017 #14
see, how is that EVEN YOU believes that garbage? Skittles Apr 2017 #18
Hillary sure as Fuck wasn't "unqualified"! That's Bullshit Cha Apr 2017 #21
Maddening isn't it Cha? She was THE most qualified candidate ever to run. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #22
Yes Hillary was the most Qualified Candidate ever Cha Apr 2017 #23
So now that you've read all the links provided that show your error... Hekate Apr 2017 #25
"She was unqualified." LenaBaby61 Apr 2017 #27
You're STILL believing the lies Republicans want you to believe? And still SPREADING them? Squinch Apr 2017 #36
+1 uponit7771 Apr 2017 #13
All candidates are flawed. They're human beings. lapucelle Apr 2017 #15
Yep. And it wrongly implies her "flaws" are what caused her to lose. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #28
Media malpractice. That sums it up. SticksnStones Apr 2017 #8
I'll look for a kindle version BainsBane Apr 2017 #11
I'm gonna get it because this sort of analysis is necessary to understand last year .. JHan Apr 2017 #12
they have NOT destroyed her Skittles Apr 2017 #17
Putting it on my book list. Thanks! betsuni Apr 2017 #20
About time. KnR Hekate Apr 2017 #24
Post removed Post removed Apr 2017 #26
Hubris, e-mails, Establishment, status quo. betsuni Apr 2017 #29
Hilarious 1st post ... LenaBaby61 Apr 2017 #30
Zapped already. That Troll didn't even try to be subtle. The Putin troll farm is slipping. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #31
What does "posting privileges revoked" mean? lapucelle Apr 2017 #39
It means they are gone. Out of here. Banned. Barred. Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2017 #42
Self reflection? truthaddict247 Apr 2017 #33
So you care about the facts? SunSeeker Apr 2017 #34
Wow. That's stark. Squinch Apr 2017 #37
I worked the ground game as a volunteer lapucelle Apr 2017 #38
The New Republic's Sarah Jones trashed it in a review and basically said it m-lekktor Apr 2017 #40
Sarah Jones? lapucelle Apr 2017 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So who's reading "The Des...»Reply #34