Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So who's reading "The Destruction of Hillary Clinton"? [View all]SunSeeker
(51,518 posts)34. So you care about the facts?
Your Politico piece notes in MI "the UAW flaked on GOTV commitments in the final days, and that AFSCME never even made any, despite months of appeals." A lot of people, smart politically adept people, assumed she was doing fine and did not require heroic measures. That's what the polls said. Hillary herself did campaign in MI.
To ignore what truly killed her in the last days, namely the unanticipated disaster that was Comey's release of that letter, is to be much more akin to climate change deniers than anyone in Hillary's campaign. Ignorance is indeed ignorance.
Unlike the effect of Russian interference on the 2016 presidential campaign, the effectin votesof the now-infamous Comey Letter is knowable.
While various media outlets downplayed the effect at the time, the hard data is unmistakable: according to a Politico/Morning Consult poll taken immediately after FBI Director Comeys end-of-October announcement that the FBI would be reviewing additional evidence in the Clinton email-server case, one-third of likely voters reported that the revelation made them much less likely to vote for Clinton.
In an election Clinton lost by just 77,143 combined votes in three statesout of well over 136 million votes castthis sort of polling data is one indication that Comeys announcement could have cost Clinton millions of votes nationwide. But looking inside the Politico/Morning Consult data, we find much more evidence for that conclusion: specifically, the fact that while 26% of the polls 33% figure comes from Trump voters, the remaining 7% comes from those reporting to be Clinton voters.
So its clear the Comey Letter was more than enoughas a matter of mathto put Trump in the White House.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bigger-than-watergate-concerns-grow-that-anti-clinton_us_5850bb12e4b0b662c2fddebc
While various media outlets downplayed the effect at the time, the hard data is unmistakable: according to a Politico/Morning Consult poll taken immediately after FBI Director Comeys end-of-October announcement that the FBI would be reviewing additional evidence in the Clinton email-server case, one-third of likely voters reported that the revelation made them much less likely to vote for Clinton.
In an election Clinton lost by just 77,143 combined votes in three statesout of well over 136 million votes castthis sort of polling data is one indication that Comeys announcement could have cost Clinton millions of votes nationwide. But looking inside the Politico/Morning Consult data, we find much more evidence for that conclusion: specifically, the fact that while 26% of the polls 33% figure comes from Trump voters, the remaining 7% comes from those reporting to be Clinton voters.
So its clear the Comey Letter was more than enoughas a matter of mathto put Trump in the White House.
Hillary did add additional campaign stops in MI and other battleground states in those final days when she saw how much damage the letter was doing. http://amp.usatoday.com/story/93356788/ But the damage was too much to overcome in the few days she had left. Comey's letter was the perfect sabotage.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thank you for posting this. Every time I see that stupid lie about her not campaigning I
betsuni
Apr 2017
#19
You're STILL believing the lies Republicans want you to believe? And still SPREADING them?
Squinch
Apr 2017
#36
I'm gonna get it because this sort of analysis is necessary to understand last year ..
JHan
Apr 2017
#12
Zapped already. That Troll didn't even try to be subtle. The Putin troll farm is slipping.
SunSeeker
Apr 2017
#31