General Discussion

lapucelle

(18,229 posts)

41. Sarah Jones?

Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:31 AM

Apr 2017

Isn't she the millennial feminist who also trashed Hillary's "simpering brand of feminism"?

I'm not surprised to see deflection from Jones. No one likes to be called out for trying to straddle the hipster fence, and Bardo's analysis of their role in Trump's win is uncomfortably honest.

"Violence against women is not culture; it's not custom, it's criminal."
Senator Clinton defending her feminist views as consistent with the State Department's mission during her SOS confirmation hearings.

Simper away, Madam Secretary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So who's reading "The Destruction of Hillary Clinton"? [View all] lapucelle Apr 2017 OP

Can't wait to read it. Kath2 Apr 2017 #1

Yes, she was attacked from all sides. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #2

This DURHAM D Apr 2017 #3

2016 is a reminder that both fascists and communists are bad people. Dawson Leery Apr 2017 #4

At the publisher's website lapucelle Apr 2017 #5

She was unqualified in the sense that she didn't campaign in WI or MI... Cooley Hurd Apr 2017 #6

I believe jehop61 Apr 2017 #7

Yep. Like I said, she was attacked from all sides. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #10

OFFS. She sure as fuck did campaign in MI. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #9

Thank you for posting this. Every time I see that stupid lie about her not campaigning I betsuni Apr 2017 #19

Self reflection? truthaddict247 Apr 2017 #32

See my response to your duplicate post below. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #35

this is false uponit7771 Apr 2017 #14

see, how is that EVEN YOU believes that garbage? Skittles Apr 2017 #18

Hillary sure as Fuck wasn't "unqualified"! That's Bullshit Cha Apr 2017 #21

Maddening isn't it Cha? She was THE most qualified candidate ever to run. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #22

Yes Hillary was the most Qualified Candidate ever Cha Apr 2017 #23

So now that you've read all the links provided that show your error... Hekate Apr 2017 #25

"She was unqualified." LenaBaby61 Apr 2017 #27

You're STILL believing the lies Republicans want you to believe? And still SPREADING them? Squinch Apr 2017 #36

+1 uponit7771 Apr 2017 #13

All candidates are flawed. They're human beings. lapucelle Apr 2017 #15

Yep. And it wrongly implies her "flaws" are what caused her to lose. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #16

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #28

Media malpractice. That sums it up. SticksnStones Apr 2017 #8

I'll look for a kindle version BainsBane Apr 2017 #11

I'm gonna get it because this sort of analysis is necessary to understand last year .. JHan Apr 2017 #12

they have NOT destroyed her Skittles Apr 2017 #17

Putting it on my book list. Thanks! betsuni Apr 2017 #20

About time. KnR Hekate Apr 2017 #24

Post removed Post removed Apr 2017 #26

Hubris, e-mails, Establishment, status quo. betsuni Apr 2017 #29

Hilarious 1st post ... LenaBaby61 Apr 2017 #30

Zapped already. That Troll didn't even try to be subtle. The Putin troll farm is slipping. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #31

What does "posting privileges revoked" mean? lapucelle Apr 2017 #39

It means they are gone. Out of here. Banned. Barred. Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2017 #42

Self reflection? truthaddict247 Apr 2017 #33

So you care about the facts? SunSeeker Apr 2017 #34

Wow. That's stark. Squinch Apr 2017 #37

I worked the ground game as a volunteer lapucelle Apr 2017 #38

The New Republic's Sarah Jones trashed it in a review and basically said it m-lekktor Apr 2017 #40

Sarah Jones? lapucelle Apr 2017 #41