Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kaine [View all]Nanjeanne
(4,915 posts)9. So basically same as Mello if you actually believed facts
https://www.thenation.com/article/why-was-heath-mello-thrown-under-the-bus/
Heres the truth about Mellos record: Back in 2009, he co-sponsored a bill requiring a physician performing an abortion to tell a woman that an ultrasound is available (as most already did). It neither mandated that the ultrasound be performed nor, if performed, that it actually be viewed by the womanalthough it did require abortion providers to position the screen is such a way that the ultrasound was easily viewable.
All of these bills were opposed by Planned Parenthoodand, given the realities of Nebraska politics, all easily passed.
Whats more interesting is what happened nextand what didnt. In 2012, Mello voted with Planned Parenthood on two out of three bills tracked by the groupand was excused from voting on the third. After that, Mello, who had become the influential chair of the state legislatures Budget Committee, voted with Planned Parenthood 100 percent of the time. By 2015, the group was celebrating a fourth straight year .without enacting any new abortion restrictions in Nebraska, thanks largely to committed womens health advocates engaged in the legislative process.
Whats more interesting is what happened nextand what didnt. In 2012, Mello voted with Planned Parenthood on two out of three bills tracked by the groupand was excused from voting on the third. After that, Mello, who had become the influential chair of the state legislatures Budget Committee, voted with Planned Parenthood 100 percent of the time. By 2015, the group was celebrating a fourth straight year .without enacting any new abortion restrictions in Nebraska, thanks largely to committed womens health advocates engaged in the legislative process.
Like many of his supportersincluding some of his most fervently pro-choice supportersMello told me that he would like abortion to be a private matter between a woman and her partner, or her conscience. So long as womens rights are under threat, that cant happen. But when I ask Mello if, when he says he will not restrict womens reproductive care, that includes abortions, he doesnt equivocate: Of course. I thought that was obvious.
Bolding mine.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
One of the restrictions (partial-birth abortions) came about in Virginia at a time when the GOP
FSogol
Apr 2017
#1
he DOES NOT support restrictions on partial birth abortions and can we please leave the RW framing
boston bean
Apr 2017
#3
Under Roe, certain restrictions on third trimester abortions are legitimate.
Foamfollower
Apr 2017
#26
They made up the term to be as offensive as possible, there is literally no such
Vesper
Apr 2017
#38
"Yesterday, I read some OP/threads on DU:GD regarding Tim Kaine, and his position on abortion"
George II
Apr 2017
#8
No. I get why the sole focus here is on that one ultra sound bill whose language
Vesper
Apr 2017
#39