Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Voltaire2

(12,991 posts)
33. Only if the regime was being attacked.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 06:36 PM
Apr 2017

There is no evidence that North Korea would initiate a nuclear attack, knowing that annihilation would be the outcome, but if instead the regime was faced with annihilation, they would have nothing to lose by launching their nukes, that us if they actually have any operational weapons.

Note also that they have enough deployed artillary to pretty much wipe out Seoul in fairly short order using conventional weapons, which is one reason South Korea is not too keen on confrontation.

frankly trust kim jong-un more than donnie not to go nuclear. unblock Apr 2017 #1
It's impossible to know Kim Jong-un's Cyrano Apr 2017 #10
i'm leaning more on the incentives. unblock Apr 2017 #11
But does Kim Jong-un understand that? Cyrano Apr 2017 #15
he's certainly acted as if he's content enough with the status quo. unblock Apr 2017 #16
Hope you're right Cyrano Apr 2017 #18
That's what I'm thinking too. Kim, must take pride in the buildings he's built and stuff that RKP5637 Apr 2017 #26
Unknown jberryhill Apr 2017 #2
The North Korean regime has never had a predilection for mass suicide dalton99a Apr 2017 #3
We have a very dangerous game of chicken going on that bears watching. Grammy23 Apr 2017 #4
A good question sarisataka Apr 2017 #5
It would be great if the somewhat sane inner circle, AJT Apr 2017 #6
A bigger question is, does the US have the standing to nuke NK if NK nukes SK? tonyt53 Apr 2017 #7
Yes sarisataka Apr 2017 #9
In addition to saristaka's post above, the US (and UN) is technically still at war with NK. stevenleser Apr 2017 #19
Get your point that there was not treat sighed GulfCoast66 Apr 2017 #34
I can't imagine that their saber-rattling isn't grounded in fear. forgotmylogin Apr 2017 #8
Not defending NK or any of their actions Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2017 #13
Maybe if it looked like we were closing in on him Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2017 #12
It's doubtful they have a working warhead yet... EX500rider Apr 2017 #14
Yup! A weaponized bomb may not yet be existent. longship Apr 2017 #20
NK has already launched rockets that can reach Cyrano Apr 2017 #22
Missiles Vs missiles with working nuclear warheads 2 different things. EX500rider Apr 2017 #25
I doubt it treestar Apr 2017 #17
Nope. But they wouldn't hesitate to bomb the shit out of Seoul... WoonTars Apr 2017 #21
I try to see what will happen here adigal Apr 2017 #23
Your fear is my greatest fear regarding Trump. Cyrano Apr 2017 #24
Yes. Eliot Rosewater Apr 2017 #27
Remain calm -- All is well. Binkie The Clown Apr 2017 #28
Nooo... and if he did who cares about Seattle and SF? Rustyeye77 Apr 2017 #29
If that country's leadership determined that it faced a life and death struggle, perhaps. David__77 Apr 2017 #30
He is as crazy as prez putz, which is what scares me Motley13 Apr 2017 #31
I doubt it. And I don't know that I believe the hype about Kim. NewDealProgressive Apr 2017 #32
Only if the regime was being attacked. Voltaire2 Apr 2017 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would North Korea really ...»Reply #33