Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No more NYT [View all]sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)46. New Yorker wld have rejected it
New Yorker said an article with this kind of mistruth would never have flown there. See my post above.
And corrections are not fact checking. In fact, editing and factchecking prevent corrections. Editing happens before publication. Corrections happen after.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This isn't an issue about which there is legitimately a diversity of opinion
Spider Jerusalem
May 2017
#4
Stephens isn't a climate scientist and lacks the educational background to debate
pnwmom
May 2017
#44
He's debating the CAUSES of climate change and how much human activity is a factor. n/t
pnwmom
May 2017
#51
I'm a paleontologist and evolutionary biologist by inclination and much formal training.
hunter
May 2017
#17