General Discussion

creeksneakers2

(7,472 posts)

54. I don't see that there

Wed May 3, 2017, 07:00 PM

May 2017

Here' a link. Would you please tell me where he is debating causes or questioning if human activity is a factor?

"...indisputable, as is the human influence on that warming..."

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/28/opinion/climate-of-complete-certainty.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fbret-stephens&action=click&contentCollection=opinion&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=collection&_r=0

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No more NYT [View all] kpete May 2017 OP

Op-Ed pages are supposed to be diverse creeksneakers2 May 2017 #1

so if someone says the world is flat Skittles May 2017 #3

So what if they do say its flat? creeksneakers2 May 2017 #10

ridiculous Skittles May 2017 #11

Fox News it what it is creeksneakers2 May 2017 #24

No, it is what it is because hosts lie to present one spooky3 May 2017 #26

The Supreme Court has protected false speech creeksneakers2 May 2017 #41

YOU DON'T GIVE EQUAL TIME TO CRANKS Skittles May 2017 #49

Yeah, not a great argument. Sorry. WinkyDink May 2017 #14

Even op-eds should be fact checked sharedvalues May 2017 #28

It was fact checked creeksneakers2 May 2017 #39

New Yorker wld have rejected it sharedvalues May 2017 #46

Finally cancelled my NYT Worktodo May 2017 #47

Good for you sharedvalues May 2017 #48

This isn't an issue about which there is legitimately a diversity of opinion Spider Jerusalem May 2017 #4

One reason science is as good as it is creeksneakers2 May 2017 #7

Sorry, but... Spider Jerusalem May 2017 #9

All those things you say are true creeksneakers2 May 2017 #21

"All"? Do you suppose the Heliocentric Theory, e.g., is "up for challenge"? WinkyDink May 2017 #16

It would be difficult to beat it creeksneakers2 May 2017 #22

One big difference you're forgetting athena May 2017 #31

The analyses creeksneakers2 May 2017 #33

Do you have children? athena May 2017 #34

Wow! creeksneakers2 May 2017 #36

Do you also believe athena May 2017 #42

The responses to the editorial creeksneakers2 May 2017 #45

That is patently false. athena May 2017 #19

Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word all creeksneakers2 May 2017 #20

Solid, accepted results don't get disproven. athena May 2017 #25

Climate change was not established centuries ago creeksneakers2 May 2017 #27

That doesn't mean the NYTimes should give a platform to someone who is pushing pnwmom May 2017 #35

Did you read it? creeksneakers2 May 2017 #37

Yes, and I also read this: pnwmom May 2017 #40

Stephens and the scientists at your link and you creeksneakers2 May 2017 #43

Stephens isn't a climate scientist and lacks the educational background to debate pnwmom May 2017 #44

Stephens isn't debating climate change creeksneakers2 May 2017 #50

He's debating the CAUSES of climate change and how much human activity is a factor. n/t pnwmom May 2017 #51

I don't see that there creeksneakers2 May 2017 #54

He has a long history. For example: pnwmom May 2017 #55

Alarmist creeksneakers2 May 2017 #56

Not so diverse that they include FAKE SCIENCE. n/t pnwmom May 2017 #5

I read the Op-Ed creeksneakers2 May 2017 #23

"supposed to be diverse" tenderfoot May 2017 #15

I heard a report that said eating boogers is good for you. creeksneakers2 May 2017 #38

Yes. elleng May 2017 #32

It's a shame that scientists can't be fair and balanced dalton99a May 2017 #2

.. Cha May 2017 #6

Warped? NurseJackie May 2017 #8

At this point we can't save the planet... hunter May 2017 #12

Actually, the planet does not need to be saved. Caliman73 May 2017 #13

I'm a paleontologist and evolutionary biologist by inclination and much formal training. hunter May 2017 #17

Sad but true. Caliman73 May 2017 #18

"Much more likely we end up dead dirt that will never be sifted, eternally forgotten." CrispyQ May 2017 #53

We could theoretically use railguns to launch discs between us LittleBlue May 2017 #52

You're too smart to do such, elleng May 2017 #29

NYT must print facts, even in op-eds - so says New Yorker sharedvalues May 2017 #30