Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

underpants

(187,886 posts)

7. He threw that out to intimidate

Reply to kentuck (Reply #6)

Sat May 13, 2017, 07:16 PM

May 2017

and the lazy press have factored it in to fill air time.

Do we really think that Bannon et al want their conversations recorded? Aside from the illegality of it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Who do you think shit in their pants when they heard about the "tape"? [View all] kentuck May 2017 OP

Where is Steve Bannon on the list? MiniMe May 2017 #1

My thought. - How is Trump going to get anyone to collude with him now? Or even talk to him? Feathery Scout May 2017 #2

everyone who's uttered a word in that room.... spanone May 2017 #3

There's no tape underpants May 2017 #4

I think you are probably right. kentuck May 2017 #6

He threw that out to intimidate underpants May 2017 #7

Evidently Trump has a track record of recording people Quixote1818 May 2017 #10

I've seen that underpants May 2017 #11

So, if pressed... kentuck May 2017 #12

Neither underpants May 2017 #13

"Other" equals "All of the Above". democratisphere May 2017 #5

Bannon. lastlib May 2017 #8

Other: Multiple including Bannon Eugene May 2017 #9