General Discussion

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)

57. Well there's also a Snopes page for Obama's

Mon May 15, 2017, 11:00 AM

May 2017

If you like your insurance you can keep your insurance.....and we all know what he meant by that.

But yes he said it. So let's call him a liar, right?

But back to Louise ~

Mensch went on to clarify and post Twitter threads of a particlaur group - the one, in fact, that got violent at Berkeley, as they sent out a call to gather and stir up trouble at other events. The violent actors are out there. Why wouldn't BLM be a target for infiltration? Its very existence is a pushback against the status quo.

How does a riot need funding? Really? The idea that paid operatives can cause a chain reaction of violence? That doesn't seem plausible?

And if you are of the mindset that arrests are what will validate the occurance of illegal behavior, well then, I've got some yellow cake from Nigeria to sell you ~

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A lawyer for Louise Mensch seems worried that her latest "bombshell" is bullshit. [View all] jberryhill May 2017 OP

Understandable, this is the biggest story in years if true. If false Quixote1818 May 2017 #1

Yup n/t renegade000 May 2017 #19

Same Grand Jury issued subpoenas for Flynn associates hours before Comey was fired. L. Coyote May 2017 #49

The higher their credibility rises, the more likely Eyeball_Kid May 2017 #51

I find it hard to believe they have an indictment against Trump this early in the investigation. hrmjustin May 2017 #2

Early? They have been investigating this for over a year. nt Quixote1818 May 2017 #7

Yeah, but... hvn_nbr_2 May 2017 #16

Because there are many more pieces to the puzzle. Often they start with the charges that pnwmom May 2017 #18

I would take it with a grain of salt. welivetotreadonkings May 2017 #3

This is the thing I find fascinating jberryhill May 2017 #4

Pretty much like you've just done. OilemFirchen May 2017 #9

I don't know jack about Mensch or her lawyer jberryhill May 2017 #11

And what of the other question? OilemFirchen May 2017 #13

No I don't think they are actionable jberryhill May 2017 #14

Then he's not "worried that her latest 'bombshell' is bullshit". OilemFirchen May 2017 #15

Libel? bathroommonkey76 May 2017 #20

It is easy to demonize truthtellers. AngryAmish May 2017 #33

Not sure "questionable" is the right word. The sources have a good track records Quixote1818 May 2017 #12

Is there a set of numbers on that track record? jberryhill May 2017 #47

would you please stop.. chillfactor May 2017 #5

Really, in what way? jberryhill May 2017 #6

You are not negative you are a "concern troll" - LOL LeftInTX May 2017 #8

Ah, good, I already earned by "comrade" badge tonight jberryhill May 2017 #10

In addition BeyondGeography May 2017 #22

Well for one thing... Orrex May 2017 #24

Thanks for that. Nt moriah May 2017 #31

Because I was positive I had already eaten it jberryhill May 2017 #34

How about asking yourself leftynyc May 2017 #60

Doubtful. I'm negative... moriah May 2017 #32

If you want positive results, you should see Trump's doctor jberryhill May 2017 #46

Facts truthaddict247 May 2017 #17

Crazy! Right out in the open! elias7 May 2017 #21

Why is her lawyer talking to her via Twitter? oberliner May 2017 #23

Because it's fake as hell Lee-Lee May 2017 #26

My thoughts exactly oberliner May 2017 #28

I should have read the comments leftynyc May 2017 #61

That's the most obviously staged public "conversation" I've seen in a while Lee-Lee May 2017 #25

That's a fair point. Denzil_DC May 2017 #27

There is a world of difference between sources and your legal counsel Lee-Lee May 2017 #29

Well, one attorney just did. Denzil_DC May 2017 #30

He's just interacting as a twitter friend Loki Liesmith May 2017 #35

Here's something lawyers are taught for the multi state ethics exam jberryhill May 2017 #38

All I can tell you is that I know Louise and Loki Liesmith May 2017 #40

Well, if you know Mensch, you'll know that she describes herself as having ADHD Denzil_DC May 2017 #41

Yes we've discussed her ADHD and my Asperger's Loki Liesmith May 2017 #42

That's why I described Mensch Denzil_DC May 2017 #45

But Jester is someone we should believe is exactly who he says he is? SticksnStones May 2017 #54

I've followed The Jester on social media for a long time, way before most here had heard of him. Denzil_DC May 2017 #62

Wasn't railing...I would have chosen stronger words if I was railing SticksnStones May 2017 #63

lol This is all bizarre and funny. Oneironaut May 2017 #39

And you just jumped the shark Charlotte Little May 2017 #52

To be fair jberryhill May 2017 #48

It's bull crap. I wish people would stop believing this hack. Oneironaut May 2017 #36

The proverbial Time will tell, no? It's not like LM is disputing some point in the ancient past that WinkyDink May 2017 #37

Well I guess the jury is still out on her claim that Russians were funding BLM protests in Ferguson jberryhill May 2017 #53

That's out of context SticksnStones May 2017 #55

Pull my other leg, it's got bells on it jberryhill May 2017 #56

Well there's also a Snopes page for Obama's SticksnStones May 2017 #57

So all of the paid instigators got away jberryhill May 2017 #58

Can I verify? No. Plausible? Yes. SticksnStones May 2017 #59

The lawyer is telling her to be careful and she is telling him she understands. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #43

This has been a very busy weekend for the #TrumpTrollArmy, lots of overtime in Moscow. L. Coyote May 2017 #44

Thatcherite bullshit artist says what? WoonTars May 2017 #50