Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

8. You are confusing 'evidence' with 'proof'

Reply to MichMary (Reply #6)

Thu May 18, 2017, 12:40 PM

May 2017

It's up to a jury to decide what weight or credibility to give it.

Just because something is admissible as evidence, doesn't make it true.

What is this trial about. Did she end up in the trunk of your car gutted like a fish?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question about evidence re: Comey memo [View all] MichMary May 2017 OP

Solely? No.... Wounded Bear May 2017 #1

This! MichMary May 2017 #7

Not on that alone, but it would be evidence to be considered. MineralMan May 2017 #2

It's not verifiable evidence as I understand it. n/t TexasProgresive May 2017 #3

Huh? djg21 May 2017 #15

You might find this thread worth your while jberryhill May 2017 #4

Interesting MichMary May 2017 #6

You are confusing 'evidence' with 'proof' jberryhill May 2017 #8

The body was never found . . . MichMary May 2017 #10

Do you own any fish gutting knives? jberryhill May 2017 #11

Again, very interesting MichMary May 2017 #13

I believe notes written by the FBI are taken more seriously than someones recollection. womanofthehills May 2017 #14

It's a little like a cop's notes in court Jarqui May 2017 #5

Sending witnesses out of the room. That's the clincher IMO. nt justiceischeap May 2017 #9

Maybe he'll claim he did that to ask Comey if he could see his dick. Jarqui May 2017 #12