HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Question about evidence r... » Reply #15

Response to TexasProgresive (Reply #3)

Thu May 18, 2017, 01:17 PM

15. Huh?


It's hearsay, but it comes in as under an exception to the hearsay rule as a business record or present sense impression (or it may be used to refresh Comey's recollection). Before being accepted into evidence, the memo needs to be authenticated, which would require Comey to testify and lay the foundation as to how and why he prepared it.

Is it enough? It certainly presents a question of fact and it would be up to a jury to determine whether or not to believe SCROTUS or Comey and whether it evidenced obstruction. I'd want more proof if I were prosecuting.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 15 replies Author Time Post
MichMary May 2017 OP
Wounded Bear May 2017 #1
MichMary May 2017 #7
MineralMan May 2017 #2
TexasProgresive May 2017 #3
LineLineNew Reply Huh?
djg21 May 2017 #15
jberryhill May 2017 #4
MichMary May 2017 #6
jberryhill May 2017 #8
MichMary May 2017 #10
jberryhill May 2017 #11
MichMary May 2017 #13
womanofthehills May 2017 #14
Jarqui May 2017 #5
justiceischeap May 2017 #9
Jarqui May 2017 #12
Please login to view edit histories.