Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rosenstien: "I will not answer any questions about Russia investigations." Neither will McCabe... [View all]charlyvi
(6,537 posts)20. Bingo!
Corn is wrong to conclude they are part of a cover up based on this hearing. All four of them stated that it would be improper to discuss much of what they were being asked because 1) any comments might be detrimental to Meuhler's investigation or 2) the answers could not be given in a public forum due to confidentiality concerns.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rosenstien: "I will not answer any questions about Russia investigations." Neither will McCabe... [View all]
Miles Archer
Jun 2017
OP
Can any of them get in trouble for what they are doing now? Is any of this obstruction of justice?
Maraya1969
Jun 2017
#6
I think that's why they are answering (and non-answering) the way they are.
Pacifist Patriot
Jun 2017
#8
OK. And that is what they are saying up-thread. Just because I'm not sure how this works doesn't
Maraya1969
Jun 2017
#9
We also have to remember that there are good guys behind the scenes doing stuff we don't know about!
Amaryllis
Jun 2017
#25
Frustrating as it is, we do not want them revealing info that would compromise the investigation.
Amaryllis
Jun 2017
#26
While a cover-up is possible (& juicy), what you're saying is probably accurate IME. nt
WePurrsevere
Jun 2017
#55