Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Trump Card [View all]Tatiana
(14,167 posts)45. Very interesting thoughts.
I had not anticipated Mueller challenging the indictment of a sitting President precedent. Much like the AGs suing Trump for violation of the emoluments clause, this would represent creative legal strategy that the courts might be interested in considering. If anyone were to successfully indict a sitting President, it would be Mueller's team, which has extensive experience arguing before the SC.
What a mess we find ourselves in. How ironic that it may be the courts that save us.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Follow the money. The issue isn't credibility of witnesses; it's money.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2017
#16
I believe an Ind. Investigation CAN charge him with criminal activity and the GOP can't do anything.
BigmanPigman
Jun 2017
#20