Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

JI7

(89,244 posts)

2. for all their focus on islamic terrorists the fact is they are unlikely to target

Reply to All-In (Original post)

Fri Jun 16, 2017, 07:19 AM

Jun 2017

the areas many of these guys come from . unless it was while in dc.

but the ones they would expect to attack them in dc did not do so but instead it was someone that is like many of the people in their districts.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What To Make Of What Morning Joe Said About The Last 2 Shooters [View all] All-In Jun 2017 OP

the guy had a history of being violent. he was a loser piece of shit JI7 Jun 2017 #1

Yes a POS loser but they could previously compartmentalise shooters as mentally ill. This changes OnDoutside Jun 2017 #3

he was not on the democratic side. he was anti hillary and voted for Jill stein JI7 Jun 2017 #5

In their view, he's anti Republican, and that's where being associated with Sanders hurts the OnDoutside Jun 2017 #6

for all their focus on islamic terrorists the fact is they are unlikely to target JI7 Jun 2017 #2

Targeted political violence is a different animal Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #4

And another example of "assault weapons" being used, something gunners tell us doesn't happen. Hoyt Jun 2017 #7