Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(42,670 posts)
12. "solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation"
Sat Sep 23, 2017, 02:08 PM
Sep 2017

Not applicable here. Trump didn't say fire all Democrats or those Democrats that kneel during the anthem. He said fire football players that kneel. Last time I checked, the NFL wasn't a political party. And "solely" really means "solely."

What was the statement in question? Not Ruth Sep 2017 #1
Does trump own the team or co-own it? Doreen Sep 2017 #2
The key word in the 1st amendmet is "Abridge' louis c Sep 2017 #6
Only if a law was passed leading to them being fired liberal N proud Sep 2017 #3
He ran afoul of the law meow2u3 Sep 2017 #4
November is going to get good Not Ruth Sep 2017 #5
I hope Vice News follows these players around in November. n/t bathroommonkey76 Sep 2017 #18
There is applicable law that is violated. L. Coyote Sep 2017 #7
Free speech rights only apply to nazis airing their learned viewpoints in places like Berkeley. Mc Mike Sep 2017 #8
But the NFL's real problem with Ass-wipe is the ratings war: FreeStateDemocrat Sep 2017 #9
That is a huge stretch mythology Sep 2017 #10
"Chilling Effect" louis c Sep 2017 #11
"solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation" onenote Sep 2017 #12
And if I oppose the President, where is my affiliation? louis c Sep 2017 #13
You're simply ignoring what the law states. onenote Sep 2017 #14
So, what you are saying is that I am registered in no political party louis c Sep 2017 #15
You can be a member of a party and they can "lobby" for you to be fired onenote Sep 2017 #16
The answer is "yes" louis c Sep 2017 #17
and what "official act" would have been involved. onenote Sep 2017 #19
Please reread post 15 louis c Sep 2017 #20
You're simply wrong. An "official act" is a sine qua non of a violation onenote Sep 2017 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has Trump Violated the Co...»Reply #12