Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Let it cilla4progress Oct 2017 #1
I second that mikeysnot Oct 2017 #4
Don't think he can dembotoz Oct 2017 #6
Before THIS thread, sow me evidence to back up your comment. Stinky The Clown Oct 2017 #10
Over and over like this hasn't been beaten to death dembotoz Oct 2017 #81
My question was about ME. You said it about ME. Stinky The Clown Oct 2017 #93
Well if the shoe fits.. give it a rest dembotoz Oct 2017 #175
There ya go. Obfuscating again. Man up. Say what you meant Stinky The Clown Oct 2017 #183
I sense someone trying to provoke so they can hit the alert dembotoz Oct 2017 #193
Ah, so that's it. Stinky The Clown Oct 2017 #196
Can't say I give a shit to look at your history dembotoz Oct 2017 #246
So, you just threw out a personal accusation to me with ZERO proof Stinky The Clown Oct 2017 #252
Bernie bashing has become quite the sport dembotoz Oct 2017 #255
All fine and dandy. Stinky The Clown Oct 2017 #258
Ignore them. There is nothing for you to let go. You are discussing present tense. stevenleser Oct 2017 #184
That is not true. Sanders made this decision this week. stevenleser Oct 2017 #186
Object to what... tonedevil Oct 2017 #191
Interesting try at reframing the debate with a red herring but I'm not biting. stevenleser Oct 2017 #192
As stipulated... tonedevil Oct 2017 #195
And as I said, your red herring is irrelevant. nt stevenleser Oct 2017 #202
You... tonedevil Oct 2017 #207
He made a public statement this week BainsBane Oct 2017 #232
Just trash the thread and move on SCantiGOP Oct 2017 #61
Let what go? George II Oct 2017 #89
There is nothing to let go. Sanders made a decision this week we don't like. nt stevenleser Oct 2017 #185
Nothing wrong with Hillary or Bernie. The election was rigged. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #2
+ 1 This Jakes Progress Oct 2017 #36
I'm sick of the Dem circular firing squad when the election was stolen. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #40
Hillary Only Had To Beat The FBI, Russia, Trump, And The Entire Billionaire Funded GOP SeattlePop Oct 2017 #65
Exactly, blaming her is not facing reality. And until the Dems face Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #69
She could have beaten all of them except the FBI. Actually, she did beat the FBI the first two times StevieM Oct 2017 #194
Further, I think the suppression hepled a hell of a lot too. So wan't just the FBI. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #197
YES. FBI, Putin, voter rigging, suppression, intense propaganda, slander. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #215
Amazing that, right? Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #220
Yes, so all the Hillary bashing leaves me totally dumb founded. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #222
Thank-you Irish, for the support and balance. I totally respect your position. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #223
Yes I wonder too. So far nothing is being done to secure our voting system. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #224
Now I have to go defend Bernie on another thread. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #225
LOL I'll try. But you know how the Irish are. :( Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #226
I do. Maternal side. Both parents of my mothers parents. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #227
Off topic, but I think Ireland is letting great grandchildren of immigrants Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #228
Really, just men? Beartracks Oct 2017 #303
Comey was a huge blow. But could Hillary have beaten Putin? Not sure. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #214
She had Trump, Putin and Comey beat--decisively--with 11 days to go. StevieM Oct 2017 #217
This is a much more productive dialogue than blaming Hillary and Bernie. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #219
There wasn't voter fraud. There was election fraud. MrsCoffee Oct 2017 #274
Yes. The crime of the century. We do not know yet the full extent of the crime. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #276
Yes Bernie and O'Malley would have been targeted too. nt Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #218
Yes, and Jakes Progress Oct 2017 #213
If we don't face reality it is going to happen again, YES. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #216
Not blaming them. And Jakes Progress Oct 2017 #325
The propaganda was intense, unrelenting and targeted to both right and left. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #327
+ 1,000,000 LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #74
+1000 Duppers Oct 2017 #122
With posts like this SHRED Oct 2017 #3
He needed the DNC $$$$ and resources hack89 Oct 2017 #11
bullcrap shanny Oct 2017 #17
Right. You keep believing that hack89 Oct 2017 #20
lol shanny Oct 2017 #21
ok. nt hack89 Oct 2017 #22
Source for this being his reason for running as a Dem? ehrnst Oct 2017 #38
Bernie himself, repeatedly and early. shanny Oct 2017 #124
Seriously? The vote was split by all the divisiveness. brush Oct 2017 #42
+1, and it was only about 75,000 people spread over about 4 states. R B Garr Oct 2017 #94
This! (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #128
So, what, exactly? shanny Oct 2017 #254
Not at all equivalent. Hillary backed O enthusiastically, Sanders backed her reluctantly... brush Oct 2017 #256
Did her followers? shanny Oct 2017 #261
Where we talking about the losers of the 2 primaries, Clinton and Sanders, or the pumas? brush Oct 2017 #264
Nader ran in the General Election as an independent, he never ran in the 2000 Primaries..... George II Oct 2017 #133
Disingenuous much? shanny Oct 2017 #247
What's disingenuous? You're comparing a primary campaign to a general election campaign. George II Oct 2017 #269
for some people it is shanny Oct 2017 #304
He said he ran as a dam for media cover...so it because he needed something from us to all american girl Oct 2017 #306
... shanny Oct 2017 #310
Exactly, and his own words say that. He needed the media attention running as R B Garr Oct 2017 #25
He set a record for donations SHRED Oct 2017 #27
What would you expect him to say? "I want the cash"? hack89 Oct 2017 #32
Sanders says he ran as a Democrat for 'media coverage' charlyvi Oct 2017 #45
So? Are we supposed to take everything a politician says at face value? hack89 Oct 2017 #47
Um...I'm agreeing with you charlyvi Oct 2017 #48
Sorry. Caffeine levels must be low. nt hack89 Oct 2017 #51
No problem. n/t charlyvi Oct 2017 #58
I have zero problems with his common sense approach. nt Lucky Luciano Oct 2017 #101
You can agree or not with his approach charlyvi Oct 2017 #113
Of course he ran as a dem for dem infrastructure. Who thought otherwise?!?! Lucky Luciano Oct 2017 #121
You haven't read this complete thread, have you? charlyvi Oct 2017 #123
Trump says he sexually assaults and gets away with it. Yes, I listen. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #106
My two points still stand however SHRED Oct 2017 #91
Not really. The donations were challenged in formal FEC investigative letters R B Garr Oct 2017 #100
Such an unproductive topic SHRED Oct 2017 #108
It's more about One Man, if we're being realistic, and there is more to R B Garr Oct 2017 #110
Bingo. MrsCoffee Oct 2017 #132
Plus, at the time he decided to run as a Dem charlyvi Oct 2017 #120
And he also promised at that time to stay in the Democratic Party and broke that promise. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #283
3 or 4 different periods with FEC? Also, a 10 million donation I have not heard followup on. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #140
Well, I am disappointed and not surprised. We gave him the benefit he didn't want to split the vote Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #102
Irrelevant point Lucky Luciano Oct 2017 #107
Significant and telling point. He had no respect or integrity when it came to the Democratic Party, Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #112
Exactly. Well said, Msh. charlyvi Oct 2017 #136
It's amazing how you see reactions to bad decisions and suggest even worse decisions. stevenleser Oct 2017 #188
It's not "back"...he never changed from WhiteTara Oct 2017 #5
Exactly. He filed the necessary paperwork with the Senate last year, stopbush Oct 2017 #14
His running "as a Democrat" rock Oct 2017 #53
He's running as an Independent WhiteTara Oct 2017 #155
Yeah rock Oct 2017 #156
Are you surprised? WhiteTara Oct 2017 #163
When at least two people commit a planned crime rock Oct 2017 #212
Sanders is not going to get any more money from the Dems. librechik Oct 2017 #7
I'm a Dem and he's going to get more money from me if he needs it. Jim Lane Oct 2017 #49
Same here. MuseRider Oct 2017 #59
Same here. Duppers Oct 2017 #115
I honestly think that Senator MuseRider Oct 2017 #141
Excellent points. Duppers Oct 2017 #328
No doubt you and other will send him money. But I don't think he can win a primary for many reasons Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #157
Here is the thing. I thought maybe people might recognize the courts as our one last chance. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #176
You have ANY evidence that progressive democrats don't care about the courts? hueymahl Oct 2017 #181
Yes. I do. Anyone claiming to be progressive and writing Sanders name in or voting Stein made it Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #190
OOOOKAAY hueymahl Oct 2017 #199
Pretty straight forward and an easy, really easy concept so I have to ask why your challenge. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #200
Well, progressives are a sizable portion of the Democratic base hueymahl Oct 2017 #201
You could not be more wrong. You are the one that defines a "progressive" in a limited manner. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #204
I have not given a definition of progressive hueymahl Oct 2017 #208
No, I did not. Take it back. I ONLY stated those writing in Sanders or voting 3rd party or not Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #211
No...these folks are not any sort of the Democratic base...and I question their progressive Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #267
First of all ....Democrats are progressive...the far far left and green riffraff are not the base Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #266
Both you and MSH are creating straw men hueymahl Oct 2017 #299
"Progressive wing" of the party. Ya, that. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #305
There you go creating straw men again hueymahl Oct 2017 #311
You do not get the definition of strawman anymore than a small faction gets to own progressive. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #312
Straw Man, redux squared hueymahl Oct 2017 #315
The progressive wing of the Democratic party contains folks generally left of the leadership Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #317
Yes, I stand by that statement hueymahl Oct 2017 #320
I only count a few that do not work on social reform and tell us to put it to the side. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #313
Off the top of my head hueymahl Oct 2017 #314
A handful. I have another. Sanders. He is not about progressing on liberal social ideas. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #316
You know, you and I don't disagree that much hueymahl Oct 2017 #318
You do not understand why I made my point in my posts? Because a small faction is taking Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #319
I agree with that, at least partially hueymahl Oct 2017 #321
Clinton is very progressive as is Pelosi and others being bashed continually. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #322
I don't disagree hueymahl Oct 2017 #323
I agree completely. And when I brought up courts on other sites the response was meh Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #265
He has been raising money for dems for years. scipan Oct 2017 #174
Has he? I do not know that is fact. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #177
+1. No DNC support for this person. liquid diamond Oct 2017 #308
Yeah, Bernie was sitting at that dinner table with Flynn and Stein Greybnk48 Oct 2017 #8
My favorite part is the little trick you pull when you follow Sanders' name with that of Stein. LanternWaste Oct 2017 #9
The intention is not to refight the primaries but to avoid a repeat of our 16 loss in 20. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #16
I thought the 16 loss was all Russia and Comey? Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2017 #56
If you don't cherry pick your "reality," it's not hard at all to keep track. The Russian's R B Garr Oct 2017 #79
Bernie's campaign and his supporters radical noodle Oct 2017 #241
So it wasnt Russia and Comey among other things? Eliot Rosewater Oct 2017 #103
Apparently it was all Sanders Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2017 #109
You dont seem bothered regardless of what happened. Eliot Rosewater Oct 2017 #111
I'm very bothered that we have Trump in office. Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2017 #119
Clinton wasn't "primaried".. disillusioned73 Oct 2017 #152
We all know what he meant hueymahl Oct 2017 #182
I would hope so... GulfCoast66 Oct 2017 #209
Oh yay! A "no evidence of Russian Interference" person emulatorloo Oct 2017 #114
Absolutely NOT what I'm saying. Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2017 #117
It was the divisiveness which he engaged in, and it drew lots of attention R B Garr Oct 2017 #116
Ok, it was exploited Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2017 #135
He lost early on in the primary. Its conventional wisdom R B Garr Oct 2017 #149
It was more than one things as you know...wouldn't like to see it happen in 20. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #154
+1 demmiblue Oct 2017 #18
+1 leftstreet Oct 2017 #33
The sound of many hands clapping. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #39
thank you! Raster Oct 2017 #72
! MuseRider Oct 2017 #142
Could not have been said better hueymahl Oct 2017 #180
Yep. Freethinker65 Oct 2017 #229
He has always run in Vermont as an independent. Voltaire2 Oct 2017 #12
Amen. shanny Oct 2017 #19
+1 SixString Oct 2017 #37
I'm not familiar with the Independent Party platform. What are their stated principles? Demit Oct 2017 #62
You arent familiar with Senator Sanders positions? Voltaire2 Oct 2017 #138
Okay, so what is the common usage of the term Independent? Demit Oct 2017 #144
I don't vote for independents if a Democrat is a available personally under any circumstance. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #159
Good luck with that. Voltaire2 Oct 2017 #162
Except when he hasn't DFW Oct 2017 #245
Wrong. Blue_true Oct 2017 #271
The post you dispute is actually 100% correct. Jim Lane Oct 2017 #287
But he said he would stay a Democrat in 2015. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #285
We often disagree, but I agree completely with this post. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #13
How does he vote on the issues? Shouldn't that be the question? jalan48 Oct 2017 #15
The natural follow-up is: If one votes all "D," why is one not a regstered "D"? WinkyDink Oct 2017 #26
And my natural follow up to that is "Joe Manchin". phleshdef Oct 2017 #29
Bingo. alarimer Oct 2017 #46
So your opinion is that even though Manchin votes with us 75% of the time mythology Oct 2017 #67
That's a little too shorthand for me. Could you explain what you mean? Demit Oct 2017 #64
Joe Manchin is more of a team player comradebillyboy Oct 2017 #73
West Virginia is my home state. I know all about it. phleshdef Oct 2017 #77
Joe is not engaging in a hostile take over attempt so comradebillyboy Oct 2017 #87
I grew up in Logan. phleshdef Oct 2017 #146
I miss Robert Byrd. scipan Oct 2017 #172
Or Jay Rockefeller, who was campaigning for Obama during the 08 primaries. phleshdef Oct 2017 #251
Who cares? It's how he votes that counts with me. Plus, he's one of the most popular politicians jalan48 Oct 2017 #31
Yes. Which brings up his Nay vote on Russia sanctions. VOX Oct 2017 #129
He made it quite clear that the sanctions bill was unacceptable because it included new sanctions Voltaire2 Oct 2017 #250
Another moose-squirrel fight!!! Boris told me to ... Whiskeytide Oct 2017 #23
I would like to ask BS (heh) just 1 question: Exactly with what part of the Democratic Platform do WinkyDink Oct 2017 #24
Yep. And he will get re-elected with no problem. And he will continue to caucus with the Dems. phleshdef Oct 2017 #28
If Democrats can't come together, the drumpf family business will have democratisphere Oct 2017 #30
To that I will add, Democrats, Progressives, Socialists, Independents, Democratic Progressives, Wwcd Oct 2017 #52
Bernie was asked in 2016 if he would run as a Democrat in future elections. ollie10 Oct 2017 #34
BINGO!!!! THIS (look up) Stinky The Clown Oct 2017 #41
Oh, he must've meant in 2020. To that I say "dream on". We've seen that movie before. brush Oct 2017 #43
The question he was asked was talking about future elections in general, not specific to 2020 ollie10 Oct 2017 #90
2020 would be in that calculation wouldn't you say? brush Oct 2017 #126
link? I thought he said that too but can't find it. scipan Oct 2017 #170
Is this yet another in the series? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #35
So fucking what? alarimer Oct 2017 #44
The "team" concept in politics is based on what principles you hold. Demit Oct 2017 #50
Exactly, Being on Team Sanders is still being on a team. FSogol Oct 2017 #55
I've been on to that guy for years. nt LexVegas Oct 2017 #54
Fortunately, the Democrats of Vermont have more sense than the bash-Bernie brigade on DU Jim Lane Oct 2017 #57
Ah, back to the JPR talking points, complete with the intellectual observations R B Garr Oct 2017 #82
I would like to see a Howard Dean or other top Vermont Dem in that Dem primary. Blue_true Oct 2017 #272
Howard Dean is one of those Vermonters who have more sense than the Bernie-bashers Jim Lane Oct 2017 #286
He isn't a friend of the Democratic party moda253 Oct 2017 #60
Bernie Is Good Good Good Good Good For The Democratic Party SeattlePop Oct 2017 #63
No he wouldn't. On what do base that proclamation? George II Oct 2017 #83
Its undeniable that Sanders would have won the general LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #127
As I said, no he wouldn't. George II Oct 2017 #134
Thanks for such detailed links to counter mine and prove your position there George LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #137
Those detailed links were just speculative regarding an election that didn't occur. George II Oct 2017 #139
Exactly. The Trump people had oppo research & campaign points ready to go on Sanders. Demit Oct 2017 #150
You're arguing a hypothetical. JHan Oct 2017 #151
Yes a hypothetical. That is all I can do obviously LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #236
A "Logical conclusion" is based on evidence. JHan Oct 2017 #240
The evidence was in the poll numbers back to back against Trump LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #242
You persist in arguing a hypothetical because it gives you comfort JHan Oct 2017 #243
It is divisive nonsense. LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #289
The "divisive" posts against Sanders.. JHan Oct 2017 #290
So you are only reacting as I say I am doing? LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #291
like I said.. I won't catalogue the things he has said. JHan Oct 2017 #293
We'll just agree to disagree LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #295
Gee, I wonder if those Sanders supporters who refused to vote for Hillary in the General Election, still_one Oct 2017 #145
By the sounds of some in here I'd wager he'd get that treatment from even DU members LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #238
Capitulated isn't quite what was done. While he did endorse the Democratic nominee, it was still_one Oct 2017 #248
Half-hearted? Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2017 #277
He conceded in a very respectful way LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #292
If Sen. Sanders became the candidate somehow. There would have been hell to pay so Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #158
Many Of The People I Know Who Voted For Trump Would Have Voted For Bernie They Said SeattlePop Oct 2017 #166
They said "they didn't like any candidate", but they still voted for the racist, sexist, bigot? I still_one Oct 2017 #249
I don't buy that. I just don't Trump is not like Bernie...most of that sort voted the Russian Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #281
It's Just What They Told Me SeattlePop Oct 2017 #282
Unless they are union guys...who voted for Trump for the trade stuff which Trump lied through his Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #297
As long as he faced no ads against him BainsBane Oct 2017 #235
He was never vetted radical noodle Oct 2017 #237
Banana murielm99 Oct 2017 #143
There is one basis for that claim BainsBane Oct 2017 #230
"He isn't a friend of the Democratic party or at least not until he starts acting like it" LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #86
Well said. Can't say it enough onit2day Oct 2017 #105
LOL JHan Oct 2017 #234
Your argument is demonstrably false BainsBane Oct 2017 #294
Its only all about Bernie when you and others locked in your mindset write about him LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #296
If its not about Bernie individually BainsBane Oct 2017 #298
I appreciate your passion LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #324
And I thought politics was supposed to be about ideas. mjvpi Oct 2017 #66
Ha! Such naivete! hueymahl Oct 2017 #187
i agree with you!!! VaBchTgerLily Oct 2017 #68
In my book.... Cryptoad Oct 2017 #70
You are factually wrong. Anyone can run in the dem prez primary. scipan Oct 2017 #168
not in my book! Cryptoad Oct 2017 #173
Your book only counts for you scipan Oct 2017 #206
Sorry u didnt get it,,,,,,,,,,, Cryptoad Oct 2017 #210
tepid? paulkienitz Oct 2017 #71
"Can we get back to supporting DEMOCRATS?" Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #75
I'd rather support progressive ISSUES. scipan Oct 2017 #169
Me, too. Damn good thing our Democrats in our Democratic Party are solid progressives. Right? Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #178
Well said. yardwork Oct 2017 #76
"Of course I am a Democrat and running for the Democratic nomination." -Bernie Sanders, Feb. 2016 ashtonelijah Oct 2017 #78
Makes sense to me LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #97
Sanders was a 'Democrat' when it was beneficial to be a Democrat. kstewart33 Oct 2017 #131
Sanders knows what it takes to get elected in his state. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2017 #80
I'm not asking anyone to support Bernie, but there is a lesson to be learned from him Tobin S. Oct 2017 #84
So the 200,000 or more Democratic voters in each of those states who were unable to vote on the day Ford_Prefect Oct 2017 #85
He had his re-election campaign committee, as an independent, up and running.... George II Oct 2017 #88
As We're Discussing It....His Own Words Me. Oct 2017 #92
Bernie has an allegiance to an ideology. Not The Democratic Party. n/t SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2017 #95
Someone is principled. How awful!! nt Lucky Luciano Oct 2017 #118
not so much principle as ideological. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2017 #239
i agree...i agree.... i agree....... samnsara Oct 2017 #96
Principles before personalities or labels onit2day Oct 2017 #98
He did not "campaign his butt off" for Hillary. LisaM Oct 2017 #179
I enthusiastically endorse Sanders! nt Lucky Luciano Oct 2017 #99
Can we get back to trying to win the next election? whopis01 Oct 2017 #104
. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2017 #125
Leave Bernie alone and be grateful marlakay Oct 2017 #130
Hillary and Bernie both talented, dedicated public servants. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #147
i agree with this comment you made.... i agree with all you said. "was at best tepid" trueblue2007 Oct 2017 #148
.... disillusioned73 Oct 2017 #153
It might turn out for the best. VermontKevin Oct 2017 #160
I heard Tom Hartman say Sen. Sanders should become a Democrat last week...couldn't Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #161
well its an interesting position that a few dems are taking on this. It is an interesting question JCanete Oct 2017 #164
Sanders never quit being an Independent left-of-center2012 Oct 2017 #165
+1. YoungDemCA Oct 2017 #301
Party affiliation seems to impress some people more than ideas LittleBlue Oct 2017 #167
No, Trump is an international joke. Just about all the other countries out there have had idiot stevenleser Oct 2017 #221
'support does not translate to blind allegience...' scipan Oct 2017 #171
He would be far more influential WITH the party if he were IN the party Stinky The Clown Oct 2017 #189
almost like you wished he ran in -General Election- as a I to really split the GE vote. Hillary wou Sunlei Oct 2017 #205
Wow. THAT statement makes ZERO sense. Stinky The Clown Oct 2017 #253
If Sanders ran in GE as an Independent, he would have been a spoiler & taken votes from Hillary. Sunlei Oct 2017 #259
Thanks for making you thoughts more clear. Stinky The Clown Oct 2017 #260
and I'm registered as "Indy" to hide my party from -everyone- Sunlei Oct 2017 #198
+1 mountain grammy Oct 2017 #231
and I'll quote the DU Lords, "Fuck Jill Stein" Sunlei Oct 2017 #203
It's not back though BainsBane Oct 2017 #233
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Oct 2017 #244
I want my Democratic candidates to come from the Democratic party Progressive dog Oct 2017 #257
You'll need to change the constitution to get rid of the Electoral College, then. Gore1FL Oct 2017 #270
Why wouldn't he? Gore1FL Oct 2017 #262
WTF? KPN Oct 2017 #263
You said Sanders support in the General was tepid at best. Blue_true Oct 2017 #268
I changed my post because I misunderstood yours. IMO, I 'm amazed at Sanders energy level. Sunlei Oct 2017 #273
Did you read my post. It was about campaign events Bernie did for Hillary. Blue_true Oct 2017 #275
Their campaigns even worked together for several days after primary. They worked WELL Sunlei Oct 2017 #279
Why bring up the past? Smitty63nnn Oct 2017 #278
The Russians attacks on our democracy, Republicans who colluded, the presidents 'deals' with any Sunlei Oct 2017 #280
I just read something in our local Vermont paper that said he hasn't decided Vinca Oct 2017 #284
As he has said from the beginning Smitty63nnn Oct 2017 #288
What, people are actually surprised? Blue_Tires Oct 2017 #300
Since 2010, the Democratic Party has lost hundreds of downballot seats. YoungDemCA Oct 2017 #302
DU has always and probably always will support politicians like Bernie Sanders. aikoaiko Oct 2017 #307
Its amazing how threads that mention liquid diamond Oct 2017 #309
+1111111 KPN Oct 2017 #326
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So Sanders is going back ...»Reply #23