Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LBM20

(1,580 posts)

8. Very good post. There was not "rigging" but the way the party has been operated does need reform.

Reply to Tom Rinaldo (Reply #6)

Sat Nov 4, 2017, 07:54 AM

Nov 2017

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Learn from the '16 election and MOVE ON. We know what happened. So let's focus on 2017 and 2018. [View all] LBM20 Nov 2017 OP

you are right, it was not rigged. In 2008 Obama was the outsider. Hillary was still Hillary, and still_one Nov 2017 #1

Yes,financial rules need reform, but there was no "rigging." Primaries are run by the state parties. LBM20 Nov 2017 #9

The use of that term, and the connotations associated with it only helped foster division among still_one Nov 2017 #10

What? No hysteria from either side? HopeAgain Nov 2017 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Wwcd Nov 2017 #3

Too much sectarianism. David__77 Nov 2017 #4

Wasted words keen observer Nov 2017 #5

I hear you, but we can't let a minority of people continually sow discord. LBM20 Nov 2017 #7

I am only a low ranking officer of the Democratic Party (a Town Chair) Tom Rinaldo Nov 2017 #6

Very good post. There was not "rigging" but the way the party has been operated does need reform. LBM20 Nov 2017 #8

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Learn from the '16 electi...»Reply #8