Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

byronius

(7,392 posts)
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 06:14 PM Nov 2017

For the overly wealthy, it's not just about having more -- it's about making you have less. [View all]

This is classic hoarding-frenzy behavior, goes back all the way to when we split off from reptiles. It was always a significant attribute of royalty, historically very common in the upper merchant classes, and it goes like this: having more than you could ever need is not stimulating enough unless you know for a fact that others are suffering from having less than they need.

It is a clear fact of the hoarding disease -- and it is a disease -- that the hoarder's peak enjoyment comes from the vicarious thrill and guilty pleasure of watching other people starve. For the hoarder, too much becomes ever so much more enjoyable when the difference between themselves and the starving or stress-ridden lower classes grows wider. For them, it's like being a timid person watching a scary movie -- but it's all real.

Wealth is poison. Enough is as good as a feast, and too much in this case is a ticket to disturbingly psychopathic behavior. We all know this, and unfortunately our laws have been warped to satisfy the dark urges of addicts, weakening the nation and casting doubt on the survival of the human species.

Think of it in tribal terms. Say an ancient island culture of perhaps 100 individuals creates a monetary system based on shells. One hoarding-obsessed individual spends their entire life focusing not on work, or building -- but on gaming the economy to get hold of all the shells. Once they have most of the shells, they will still scheme to get the remainder, even though the rest of the tribe will be forced into starvation. How long do you think the other 99 members will allow this to go on? Awhile, perhaps. It's the nature of systems. But when the markers become more important than their meaning, the tribe is doomed unless it acts. They will either seize the shells and cast out the hoarder, or simply disregard the markers and make new ones. It's difficult for larger and more complex cultures to take these steps, but the principles are the same. Money is just an agreement. It is not a thing of value in and of itself, shells or dollars.

First chance we get, let's solve this problem. A 99% confiscatory tax on all incomes over a million dollars per year would certainly help to begin correcting this extremely damaging habit. Simple, fair, clean -- and the hoarding class would still get some pleasure out of maximizing their remaining one percent.

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
wealth is poison, power is poison - put them together and, well.... NRaleighLiberal Nov 2017 #1
Vast wealth allows them to change laws to make whatever they do legal, Dark n Stormy Knight Nov 2017 #2
excellent assessment... handmade34 Nov 2017 #3
Laughable nt Dreamer Tatum Nov 2017 #4
The wealthy make the laws. How do we get around that? nt Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #5
Your typical Trumpophiles on the street sees this as a good thing. world wide wally Nov 2017 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2017 #10
A system that lavishly rewards sadistic behavior moondust Nov 2017 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2017 #11
I agree that the wealthy need to pay more, but Calculating Nov 2017 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2017 #9
My very wealthy brother admits as much. No shame at all. Atman Nov 2017 #12
It's not enough for your brother to win gratuitous Nov 2017 #13
" He has enough money and property to survive anything the economy can throw at him" A HERETIC I AM Nov 2017 #14
"I shouldn't have to pay for anyone else" TexasBushwhacker Nov 2017 #16
He's said that, too. Atman Nov 2017 #19
Regarding healthcare TexasBushwhacker Nov 2017 #31
of course the fool ignores DonCoquixote Nov 2017 #28
Bring back the guillotines! smirkymonkey Nov 2017 #15
Don't forget the rotisseries, knives and forks n/t TexasBushwhacker Nov 2017 #17
Soros, Gates, Buffet, and many others might dispute this Steven Maurer Nov 2017 #18
Their "more" comes from somewhere. Honeycombe8 Nov 2017 #20
There is some saying that says, BigmanPigman Nov 2017 #21
Cats must also fail ThoughtCriminal Nov 2017 #22
Hilarious! Poiuyt Nov 2017 #26
Your title is the most concise definition I have ever seen trixie2 Nov 2017 #23
The French had a nifty mechanical device to solve this problem dalton99a Nov 2017 #24
Too swift, long cures are better burrowowl Nov 2017 #36
But that is exactly how capitalism is suppose to work Farmer-Rick Nov 2017 #25
I'm perfectly ok with captalism ClarendonDem Nov 2017 #29
Well as long as you understand capitalism is designed to concentrate wealth Farmer-Rick Nov 2017 #39
The problem is that we aren't doing what's needed to save capitalism TexasBushwhacker Nov 2017 #34
Why save it? Farmer-Rick Nov 2017 #40
Why save it? Because we are the biggest, most powerful nation on the planet TexasBushwhacker Nov 2017 #43
Feudalism had some big and powerful countries using it too, still has Farmer-Rick Dec 2017 #44
Tax the poor and middle class and redistribute the wealthy to the few. ffr Nov 2017 #27
Who is "overly wealthy" ClarendonDem Nov 2017 #30
I would say anyone who makes more than 10 times the median wage TexasBushwhacker Nov 2017 #33
You are spot on! logosoco Nov 2017 #32
now they want ALL the pie & we might get a whiff. pansypoo53219 Nov 2017 #35
there are many people who do not fit your mold. How do you explain that? Hamlette Nov 2017 #37
The Medicis. byronius Nov 2017 #38
It is about pubnishing the people who don't vote for them. L. Coyote Nov 2017 #41
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2017 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For the overly wealthy, i...