Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Out of tens of thousands of emails, only 55 000 were job related? Interesting. merrily Mar 2015 #1
But 55,000 *is* tens of thousands starroute Mar 2015 #29
It was a big deal here when the Bush administration was caught using personal email addresses. arcane1 Mar 2015 #2
Yes, but that's VERY different. merrily Mar 2015 #5
Seems as if there are a lot of things that were a big deal when they were done by the Bush admin ... markpkessinger Mar 2015 #56
OF COURSE THIS IS GOING TO BE A BIG DEAL! cynzke Mar 2015 #73
Might have been what they did with them. aquart Mar 2015 #57
Everyone in the Bush administration had YAHOO accounts. They don't have ANY of that stuff. MADem Mar 2015 #3
Her people? What? She never heard about the Bush thing or the law? merrily Mar 2015 #4
The Clintons are above the law, everybody knows that krawhitham Mar 2015 #6
Yup yup, nothing to see here - be a good Democrat now and move along. InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2015 #38
Palin did this and we crucified her. Clinton doesn't roguevalley Mar 2015 #47
I don't think this will make her toast. merrily Mar 2015 #50
I don't know about that brush Mar 2015 #61
Republicans and media hammered Benghazi without affecting either her desire to run or her anointing. merrily Mar 2015 #71
I'm definitely open to others throwing their hats in the ring. brush Mar 2015 #77
Did you happen to read the story at the link? merrily Mar 2015 #83
I did read it but went back . . . brush Mar 2015 #97
Wasn't it an article in which Schumer was saying Democratic primaries are undesirable? Only his pic? merrily Mar 2015 #98
Yeah, that was the one brush Mar 2015 #99
Really?? I didn't see any slide show of pics of Dem Presidential hopefuls at that link. merrily Mar 2015 #100
There's a link in the middle of the copy to click on. nt brush Mar 2015 #104
And there's the problem. How much leeway will the press give her as more of this happens? 7962 Mar 2015 #68
If she remains the anointed, she will be the nominee regardless of what the press says because merrily Mar 2015 #87
isn't that the truth, merrily roguevalley Mar 2015 #91
The GOP will make a big deal, but it will just look like politics to the general public 7962 Mar 2015 #90
The media has a way of riling up the general public, esp. rw radio and it's internet counterparts. merrily Mar 2015 #94
So sick of this shady crap no matter who does it. Sheelanagig Mar 2015 #7
Well, when you're putting pressure on the Haitian government OnyxCollie Mar 2015 #8
+1 whereisjustice Mar 2015 #40
Isn't that how they nailed Petraeus? leveymg Mar 2015 #9
NASA? Kelvin Mace Mar 2015 #23
Damn auto correct. NSA it is. leveymg Mar 2015 #48
Payola will be the bigger issue... nt quadrature Mar 2015 #10
i hope it irritates the right into an eye-bulging spittle-flying tic-riddled frenzy Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #11
This is what the Walker John Doe was about. He set up a private router system in his office. postulater Mar 2015 #12
So you're assuming criminal activity? uberblonde Mar 2015 #32
You know, violating the "rules of the job" is at least unethical (corrupt) Demeter Mar 2015 #64
Scott Wankers activities were all on persoonal E-Mails warrant46 Mar 2015 #75
Has it occurred to anyone.. uberblonde Mar 2015 #13
Yes, the Obama administration knew about it. They would have to, in order TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #14
One reporter said his Chuck Hagel FOIA request was kicked back. uberblonde Mar 2015 #31
Then they all need to figure out why, and look into it. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #35
The POTUS' gov't email account CANDO Mar 2015 #17
If she needs a Presidential pardon, she'll probably get one. merrily Mar 2015 #51
.... DeSwiss Mar 2015 #45
Just because a President agrees with something, or doesn't raise objection Demeter Mar 2015 #65
More tempests, more teapots...better put in another order. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #15
Put a fork in her political career... CANDO Mar 2015 #16
How do you conduct State Dept. business on non-government, unsecured TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #18
I don't know but Lawrence O seems to think that this is big. jwirr Mar 2015 #19
Yeah, I'm watching Lawrence also. CANDO Mar 2015 #21
No offense... uberblonde Mar 2015 #33
My, my, my what a quick little evidence-free bunny of condemnation you are. aquart Mar 2015 #58
My my my.... CANDO Mar 2015 #70
"Innocent until proven guilty" here on DU? Oh please Lurks Often Mar 2015 #72
Time to get someone else to run Adenoid_Hynkel Mar 2015 #85
Something is off ... sunnystarr Mar 2015 #20
Apparently HRC used private acct exclusively. CANDO Mar 2015 #22
WHEN did the "current regulations" go into effect? aquart Mar 2015 #59
2 years after she left thelordofhell Mar 2015 #62
BS - the gov't email for official biz requirement predates the Bush Admin. It's a law. leveymg Mar 2015 #76
The law did not get updated to include e-mails until after Clinton left thelordofhell Mar 2015 #82
The 1950 Act has been interpreted to include machine readable messages since the 1970s. leveymg Mar 2015 #86
The statute has covered federal records since the 1950s. The definition was probably broad enough merrily Mar 2015 #88
Thanks. leveymg Mar 2015 #92
You are welcome. merrily Mar 2015 #95
Who thought this was a good idea? nt geek tragedy Mar 2015 #24
Clearly... uberblonde Mar 2015 #34
We don't need this ripcord Mar 2015 #25
I want to wait to hear more before making a judgement but you can see the glee of some. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #26
Mind you, she has not been my favorite sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #27
Senators all have official emails. Reps, too. merrily Mar 2015 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Mar 2015 #28
"I was expecting it to be hrc@goldmansachs.com" CrispyQ Mar 2015 #79
You care about this if Old and In the Way Mar 2015 #30
Please note. uberblonde Mar 2015 #36
Didn't give his stupidity a second thought. That was his problem with his constituents. Old and In the Way Mar 2015 #37
Actually, there was a lot of outrage from Democrats when similar news about Bushco hit. Palin, too. merrily Mar 2015 #53
The latest is that the law governing this... uberblonde Mar 2015 #39
Doubtful. Official emails = federal record. The Federal Records Act was signed in 1950. merrily Mar 2015 #54
this is not fatal DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #41
She is a lawyer and I am sure new federal hires get notice of this. merrily Mar 2015 #55
16 Benghazi hearings Nuh Uh Mar 2015 #42
That's because they all use private email. apnu Mar 2015 #69
What really chaps my ass is the whole "One rule for thee and another for me" Big_Mike Mar 2015 #43
Manning did almost the opposite of what Berger did. karynnj Mar 2015 #80
You people just don't understand! DeSwiss Mar 2015 #44
That's a funny graphic. merrily Mar 2015 #60
Oh, man, thats gonna piss off a few folks!! 7962 Mar 2015 #93
You win the US Internet! MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #109
This went on for years. Mz Pip Mar 2015 #46
I think it would be proper to ask if it's the Obama administration who prefers TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #49
Gee, a warmongering corporate schill fails to comply Android3.14 Mar 2015 #63
Well said. CrispyQ Mar 2015 #81
You did know those weren't the laws in place when she was in office? brooklynite Mar 2015 #89
Do you know when someone is manipulating you? Android3.14 Mar 2015 #96
Yes and no. The law was in place since 1950 (actually much, much earlier, but we are now working merrily Mar 2015 #108
Benghazi, Benghazi!! Sancho Mar 2015 #66
moring joe hasbeen talking most of the hour about this. Many riversedge Mar 2015 #67
This looks bad for her, State Dept IT, and the administration KeepItReal Mar 2015 #74
For a Candidate in waiting this has the appearance of some serious baggage. Ford_Prefect Mar 2015 #78
We're on track to get a seriously, seriously flawed candidate Adenoid_Hynkel Mar 2015 #84
Daily Beast proves this story is false. See links below. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #101
except for the facts set out by a state dept employee: elleng Mar 2015 #102
HRC broke No Laws fredamae Mar 2015 #103
Wrong Android3.14 Mar 2015 #105
Do we know they were Not fredamae Mar 2015 #106
will the 55K emails have a 'sequence' number ? ...nt quadrature Mar 2015 #107
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton’s Use of ...»Reply #104