Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Coke Spends Lavishly on Pediatricians and Dietitians [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)37. I look forward to the day you will reconsider your views. I guarantee that you will. (nt)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You'd think the corporate woo fans would, too. Alas, no new talking points sent, I guess
villager
Sep 2015
#6
We don't have the corporate bucks that your side does! We can't buy politicos as easily
villager
Sep 2015
#12
Who needs to pay when woo heroes like Mike Adams has no shortage of stooges?
Major Nikon
Sep 2015
#13
You succeed in the playbook you were handed --bring up unrelated snark to avoid commenting on the OP
villager
Sep 2015
#14
Oh, really? As I read it, only Benbrook amended his COI form. Landrigan is lead author, anyway.
proverbialwisdom
Sep 2015
#39
Don't flatter yourself. I decided to rise above your rude and very flimsy provocation. (nt)
proverbialwisdom
Sep 2015
#34
There's certainly nothing rude or flimsy about flooding DU with anti-vax crankery
Major Nikon
Sep 2015
#35
I look forward to the day you will reconsider your views. I guarantee that you will. (nt)
proverbialwisdom
Sep 2015
#37
Catch up via parents/others on epigenetics (SLAM, CD46, IL6, IL10, measles receptor, race) and more.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2015
#46
See post #44. Incidentally, I'm considering deleting my posts on this thread not relevant to the OP.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2015
#52
Blatantly false? So I must have dreamed all those references to ageofautism, naturalnews, and OCA
Major Nikon
Oct 2015
#53
You're actually the person trolling the thread and refusing to discuss the OP
DisgustipatedinCA
Oct 2015
#50
I don't read either but traditional journalism model is busted & not necessarily trustworthy either.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2015
#41
So you don't read woo, and as proof you cite one of the biggest woo sites on the net, ageofautism
Major Nikon
Oct 2015
#42
Wrong. Whatever you find is a one-off story from a tweet not covered elsewhere & none are recent.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2015
#44