Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uawchild

(2,208 posts)
4. cite please
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 01:04 PM
Oct 2015

I would greatly appreciate seeing your source for this. Thanks in advance. The info I showed was the % share of aggregate income. If the counter argument is we are all better off now then ever, well, this info seems to feel things HAVE stagnated since the 1970's"

"The income growth of the average American family closely matched that of economic productivity until some time in the 1970s. While it began to stagnate, productivity has continued to climb.[7] According to the 2014 Global Wage Report by the International Labor Organization, the widening disparity between wages and productivity is evidence that there has been a significant shift of GDP share going from labor to capital, and this trend is playing a significant role in growing inequality.[8]"



Also, "real wages" might have risen somewhat, but does that figure really take into account the increases in cost of living? Working families sure don't feel better of than they were in the 1970's, but I conceded the point that the top 1%, 10% and even top 25% might be actually be enriched by Republican policies over that span.



This is from the article Middle-Class Squeeze on Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle-class_squeeze

Charts FBaggins Oct 2015 #1
And yet middle class income share is at Lowest Level Since 1973 too. Go Figure. uawchild Oct 2015 #2
Median real wages and incomes are higher now than in 1973 Recursion Oct 2015 #3
cite please uawchild Oct 2015 #4
Not your interlocutor but this is one I know well whatthehey Oct 2015 #5
Thanks for participating in this discussion! uawchild Oct 2015 #10
Notice "share of wealth owned" is a different question? Recursion Oct 2015 #11
notice that "median" income isn't what the OP was about either? uawchild Oct 2015 #19
Share of wealth is irrelevant to median income or QOL however whatthehey Oct 2015 #13
Your own chart is a good cite Recursion Oct 2015 #7
Also from the Wikipedia article Middle-Class Squeeze uawchild Oct 2015 #6
Yup. It still ends higher than 1973 Recursion Oct 2015 #8
So what's your point? JackRiddler Oct 2015 #14
As I said, that's in real dollars Recursion Oct 2015 #15
the question? uawchild Oct 2015 #17
"Wages and incomes are higher today than in 1973. Which was the question." For WHOM? uawchild Oct 2015 #20
Data trumps anecdotes whatthehey Oct 2015 #21
Platitudes trump nothing, but they satisfy self-delusions. JackRiddler Oct 2015 #24
The data do show growth. Slower growth is still growth. Better off is still better off. whatthehey Oct 2015 #28
Lets look more closely at that growth... uawchild Oct 2015 #16
You are still confusing share and purchasing power whatthehey Oct 2015 #23
Yeah, except it's in your imagination JackRiddler Oct 2015 #25
Absolute income growth for the median MEANS they are better off! whatthehey Oct 2015 #27
What does this data say to you? whatthehey Oct 2015 #12
Thanks Obama!!! That damn ACA is really killing the economy!!! LOL nt winstars Oct 2015 #9
When I was laid off June, 2009 Jimbo S Oct 2015 #18
Sounds like SOCIALISM! IronLionZion Oct 2015 #22
We also have ~44 milion people living in poverty. CentralMass Oct 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jobless Claims in U.S. Fa...»Reply #4