Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
see how these repukes are? Skittles May 2012 #1
+1 Solly Mack May 2012 #7
And this guy can discriminate any time he wishes. asjr May 2012 #29
he cannot see gay people beyond their sex lives, AlbertCat May 2012 #37
They are denying intelligence and talent in favor of their own cult of stupidity. What a waste. freshwest May 2012 #66
Huh? What? liberal N proud May 2012 #2
The conservatives in the 60s were totally sure equality for blacks wasn't a civil right either. phantom power May 2012 #3
This clown needs a fist in his face... Blue_Tires May 2012 #4
So does anyone who votes for him. FiveGoodMen May 2012 #11
Or he wants one...er...someplace else... Ken Burch May 2012 #40
Let's see, who is the real activist here? Dont call me Shirley May 2012 #5
Right to privacy, pursuit of happiness... truthisfreedom May 2012 #6
I had no idea gratuitous May 2012 #8
$5 says that guy was wearing diapers, a butt plug, and/or a studded leather cock harness XemaSab May 2012 #9
Probably, but I really do not want to find out. 47of74 May 2012 #15
Oh, I do XemaSab May 2012 #16
The point being, that the gov't shouldn't find out if WE have plugs... Bucky May 2012 #19
Isn't it a right to have the government out of your bedroom? lunatica May 2012 #10
It is not in the realm of government to oversee what is done sexually in private between consenting The Wielding Truth May 2012 #23
In that sex is a form of expression between two folks, wouldn't it come under "freedom of speech"? marble falls May 2012 #12
Yes, it's the freedom to ASSociate. montanto May 2012 #13
It likely was discussed in the court's "Oral Argument", but not all sodomy is Anal. 24601 May 2012 #21
Welll what was that study awhile back cindyperry2010 May 2012 #14
Or not. I think that's generalization that can't be made. HERVEPA May 2012 #58
Thank you very much. swimboy May 2012 #59
Virginia Conservatives are in an unholy alliance with this woman: swimboy May 2012 #17
There is USSC precedent that is on point. "Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) 24601 May 2012 #18
I was going to say that too SoutherDem May 2012 #20
Correct. chollybocker May 2012 #31
In GOP land, there is no "right" to anything legal if it makes some beac May 2012 #53
The same is soon to happen with gay marriage, as well. joshcryer May 2012 #61
He thinks gay guys will 'eye' him in the foxhole. What a doofus. CurtEastPoint May 2012 #22
I like how even in hatred, their ego is big enough to think they are irresistable to gay men Blue_Tires May 2012 #35
Or, perhaps, they're afraid that they AREN'T. Ken Burch May 2012 #41
Or anybody else for that matter. smirkymonkey May 2012 #69
I'm on the battlefield and have to concentrate on the enemy 600 yards away AlbertCat May 2012 #42
lol. i love how the same states and the same people pretend that the were pro-civil rights La Lioness Priyanka May 2012 #24
And a lot of times they just replaced communist/black/etc... 47of74 May 2012 #25
IMO these people are also trying to wedge african americans vs gays but they La Lioness Priyanka May 2012 #27
Maybe not PUBLIC sodomy slackmaster May 2012 #26
Stupidity is not a civil right, either. Faygo Kid May 2012 #28
What a gutless fucker. tabasco May 2012 #30
He can't have oral sex anymore? Fearless May 2012 #32
something I'm sure Mrs Marshall can attest to azurnoir May 2012 #33
wanna bet he sodomizes Mrs. Marshall? provis99 May 2012 #43
well I'm sure that azurnoir May 2012 #47
But it's okay as long as they aren't gay for each other cindyperry2010 May 2012 #55
Video: Laughing Mirror May 2012 #34
Actually, it is bluestateguy May 2012 #36
Time to start the pool on how long it'll be 'til this guy gets caught with a rent boy at Motel 6 Ken Burch May 2012 #38
Look, I think Marshall is a tool, but I see a repetitive pattern in your posts that is off the mark. swimboy May 2012 #52
OK. Ken Burch May 2012 #54
Sodomy is not just a male-on-male thing. Does this freak think he can legislate kestrel91316 May 2012 #39
I know. This stupid jerkoff doesn't know he's talking about oral sex RainDog May 2012 #65
a clumsy straight guy could easily commit a felony and not know it. yurbud May 2012 #68
A lot of married men (straight) HockeyMom May 2012 #44
But he LOVES girl-on-girl porn 1Greensix May 2012 #45
To them, girl-on-girl sex is not homosexual. mikeytherat May 2012 #57
It seems pretty self evident to me... Salviati May 2012 #46
So, should we ban from the bench anyone who has ever given or received a blow-job? Ian David May 2012 #48
Fascism, bigotry, and oppression are not, but that doesn't stop you, Marshall. n/t jtuck004 May 2012 #49
I know that old saw, but sex is sex... Flubadubya May 2012 #50
So judges are in the business of judging sexual acts of other judges. undeterred May 2012 #51
these people must lie awake at night thinking about that awful AWFUL gay sex.. frylock May 2012 #56
Neither is playing World of Warcraft naked. sofa king May 2012 #60
Sounds like the pursuit of happiness to me... PurityOfEssence May 2012 #62
This is why we can't listen to those voices that tell us Dems = Repukes. It's already started here. Tarheel_Dem May 2012 #63
It's a constitutional right RainDog May 2012 #64
The way I do it, it should be. nt Poll_Blind May 2012 #67
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Marshall says 'sodomy is ...»Reply #62