Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:36 PM Dec 2015

Gun Debate Yields Page 1 Editorial (in The New York Times) [View all]

Source: New York Times

The New York Times is running an editorial on its front page on Saturday, the first time the paper has done so since 1920, calling for greater regulation on guns in the aftermath of a spate of mass shootings.

The editorial, headlined “The Gun Epidemic,” describes it as “a moral outrage and a national disgrace that people can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency.” It suggests drastically reducing the number of firearms, and “eliminating some large categories of weapons and ammunition.”

“It is not necessary to debate the peculiar wording of the Second Amendment,” it reads. “No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation.”

In a statement, the publisher of The Times, Arthur Sulzberger Jr., said the paper was placing an editorial on Page 1 for the first time in many decades “to deliver a strong and visible statement of frustration and anguish about our country’s inability to come to terms with the scourge of guns.”

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/us/gun-debate-yields-page-1-editorial.html



24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good for the NYT. Every newspaper in America needs to follow suit. LonePirate Dec 2015 #1
Thanks. Rachel just discussed this. elleng Dec 2015 #2
Hopefully we finally reached our tipping point. cui bono Dec 2015 #3
wow gristy Dec 2015 #4
Gun Enthusiasts houston16revival Dec 2015 #5
To listen to the ammosexuals a huge majority of the public supports them. Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #6
Depends entirely on the question. jeff47 Dec 2015 #8
I'm for taking them away from guys who get a woody talking about them.... Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #9
results Go Vols Dec 2015 #13
LOL!!! Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #14
Time for Democratic Underground to get off Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #7
A masterpiece of persuasive writing Politicub Dec 2015 #10
I would have gone further than they did frazzled Dec 2015 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #16
Virtually every thing you mentioned is asked and answered SCOTUS case law pipoman Dec 2015 #17
You're dead wrong frazzled Dec 2015 #20
No, the ban was making it's way to SCOTUS pipoman Dec 2015 #21
Thank you, NYT frazzled Dec 2015 #11
Waste of column inches. Aristus Dec 2015 #12
Why an editorial? Why not a fact based article? pipoman Dec 2015 #18
Good for the nytimes. Past time! riversedge Dec 2015 #19
Big K&R - it is time for civilized folks TBF Dec 2015 #22
What was the 1920 Editorial about? houston16revival Dec 2015 #23
According to the article the nomination of Harding to be President happyslug Dec 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gun Debate Yields Page 1 ...