HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Gun Debate Yields Page 1 ... » Reply #20

Response to pipoman (Reply #17)

Sat Dec 5, 2015, 10:47 AM

20. You're dead wrong

Every challenge was put down by the Court:

A February 2013 Congressional Research Service (CRS) report to Congress said that the "Assault Weapons Ban of 1994 was unsuccessfully challenged as violating several constitutional provisions." The report said that challenges to three constitutional provisions were easily dismissed. The ban did not make up an impermissible Bill of Attainder.[19]:31 It was not unconstitutionally vague.[20] And it was not incompatible with the Ninth Amendment.

Challenges to two other provisions took more time to decide.

In evaluating challenges to the ban under the Commerce Clause, the court first evaluated Congress' authority to regulate under the clause, and second analyzed the ban's prohibitions on manufacture, transfer, and possession. The court held that "it is not even arguable that the manufacture and transfer of 'semiautomatic assault weapons' for a national market cannot be regulated as activity substantially affecting interstate commerce." It also held that the "purpose of the ban on possession has an 'evident commercial nexus.'"

The law was also challenged under the Equal Protection Clause. It was argued that it banned some semi-automatic weapons that were functional equivalents of exempted semi-automatic weapons and that to do so based upon a mix of other characteristics served no legitimate governmental interest. The reviewing court held that it was "entirely rational for Congress ... to choose to ban those weapons commonly used for criminal purposes and to exempt those weapons commonly used for recreational purposes." It also found that each characteristic served to make the weapon "potentially more dangerous," and were not "commonly used on weapons designed solely for hunting."

The federal assault weapons ban was never directly challenged under the Second Amendment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban


And no definition is necessary. More than 600 individual models and various features were included in the law. And it was found to be legal.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 24 replies Author Time Post
Newsjock Dec 2015 OP
LonePirate Dec 2015 #1
elleng Dec 2015 #2
cui bono Dec 2015 #3
gristy Dec 2015 #4
houston16revival Dec 2015 #5
Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #6
jeff47 Dec 2015 #8
Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #9
Go Vols Dec 2015 #13
Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #14
Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #7
Politicub Dec 2015 #10
frazzled Dec 2015 #15
Name removed Dec 2015 #16
pipoman Dec 2015 #17
LineLineLineLineNew Reply You're dead wrong
frazzled Dec 2015 #20
pipoman Dec 2015 #21
frazzled Dec 2015 #11
Aristus Dec 2015 #12
pipoman Dec 2015 #18
riversedge Dec 2015 #19
TBF Dec 2015 #22
houston16revival Dec 2015 #23
happyslug Dec 2015 #24
Please login to view edit histories.