Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lamp_shade

(14,796 posts)
61. That's all I could find too... from September. Perhaps Herridge is a little confused?
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 11:31 AM
Jan 2016
Put it on the pile... TipTok Jan 2016 #1
"put it on the pile"; pretty much says it all. nt 7962 Jan 2016 #5
There are some minds a "serious" scandal could change thesquanderer Jan 2016 #27
IF -- note - IF, there really is something there that would be seen as damaging, the problem is karynnj Jan 2016 #72
I'll need a better source than Fox and Catherine Herridge. marble falls Jan 2016 #2
I understand EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #4
Piss on the messenger! LOL! pocoloco Jan 2016 #32
wipe was not what I would call a professional standard." hobbit709 Jan 2016 #3
she used the wrong cloth 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #55
More proof for Republicans... thesquanderer Jan 2016 #66
HRC sent and received emails? Botany Jan 2016 #6
Its the fact that she had HIGHEST LEVEL SECURITY emails thats a problem. 7962 Jan 2016 #11
The classifications are occuring in the release to the public of these emails. yallerdawg Jan 2016 #23
Did you even read the article? SAP emails were on her server. 7962 Jan 2016 #26
I'm reading what it says. yallerdawg Jan 2016 #54
I don't think Karl Rove is the standard with which we measure acceptible behavior n/t Gore1FL Jan 2016 #14
So someone else broke the law and therefore it doesn't apply anymore? TipTok Jan 2016 #18
Rove is not running for office secondwind Jan 2016 #35
The presence of SAP messages reveals she's been untruthful the entire time 7962 Jan 2016 #7
I think these revelations about SAP messages may be her undoing. razorman Jan 2016 #30
Thanks for quoting Fox News but.. sknabt Jan 2016 #53
Do you understand that the issue of marking doesn't matter in the least? TipTok Jan 2016 #65
re: "And they don't appear panicked" thesquanderer Jan 2016 #67
The key word in your claim about the State Department is MARKED karynnj Jan 2016 #75
IF the allegations turn out to be true, I wonder what the Clinton supporters Lurks Often Jan 2016 #8
May I refer you to post #6..... 7962 Jan 2016 #12
Saw that one Lurks Often Jan 2016 #17
That excuse never worked for me as a kid, either. 7962 Jan 2016 #29
Clinton supporters will.... Nuh Uh Jan 2016 #87
After Fox "News" failed to bring Clinton down over Benghazi Zorro Jan 2016 #9
sorry EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #13
Making mountains out of molehills to discredit a Clinton is a Fox "News" agenda Zorro Jan 2016 #20
I see EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #22
I'll say the same thing when they found out she had Vince Foster murdered Zorro Jan 2016 #25
So, when John Edwards went down in flames in '07 Plucketeer Jan 2016 #76
If they find proof she sent classified info which is against the law Jarqui Jan 2016 #10
Received, not sent (nt) Recursion Jan 2016 #37
Received or sent, isn't it given it was a private server? Jarqui Jan 2016 #41
That's a red herring; it's a breach either way. Recursion Jan 2016 #43
Ok, we're on the same page :) Jarqui Jan 2016 #52
This is what happens when amateurs try to be IT professionals. n/t Gore1FL Jan 2016 #15
Funny! +1 jonno99 Jan 2016 #21
Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 #16
This OP was ALERTED?? Good lord. Is this 6th grade? 7962 Jan 2016 #38
I suspect there's a coordinated effort to alert on every single negative HRC post Major Nikon Jan 2016 #60
Concur MosheFeingold Jan 2016 #84
FOX? liberal N proud Jan 2016 #19
It's posts like yours that drive me to distraction. I've heard a number jonno99 Jan 2016 #28
Yes! Its SO odd how some cover their ears & eyes simply based on the source 7962 Jan 2016 #36
"Look at the fact that the whole OP was alerted on!!" And worse yet, 2 of 7 concurred with jonno99 Jan 2016 #42
See post #44. ieoeja Jan 2016 #49
Just the opposite actually. ieoeja Jan 2016 #44
So theres never "2 sides to every story"? 7962 Jan 2016 #69
They recovered most in September Gore1FL Jan 2016 #85
Don't really understand the point of covering ears and eyes and making noise MosheFeingold Jan 2016 #31
"You just have to be a big boy or girl and get out a giant BS filter." +1000 nt jonno99 Jan 2016 #34
See post #44. ieoeja Jan 2016 #50
Did and refuted it. Gore1FL Jan 2016 #86
Okay how is this - it shows HRC telling an aide to strip the classified tag from an email. dorkzilla Jan 2016 #90
So on top of the 55,000 pages of emails they have Jarqui Jan 2016 #24
A question? Crepuscular Jan 2016 #33
Yes, it may well help Jarqui Jan 2016 #39
Clinton hot messes - To Infinity And Beyond! Divernan Jan 2016 #48
. stonecutter357 Jan 2016 #40
Bwaaaaaaaaaaa!!! 7962 Jan 2016 #47
Now we'll learn what she really thought of O, Michelle, her in-laws, etc. Divernan Jan 2016 #45
The truth comes out. Renew Deal Jan 2016 #51
I think she deleted emails which were political bombshells & called them "personal" Divernan Jan 2016 #58
So we agree Renew Deal Jan 2016 #62
Nope. SOS's comments, written by her own hand, are NOT "gossip and BS". Divernan Jan 2016 #71
Ironically, the pontential damage could be the opposite of what people are worried about. thesquanderer Jan 2016 #77
That's good news Renew Deal Jan 2016 #46
This topic has been so done to death leftyladyfrommo Jan 2016 #56
I was looking for corroboration of this story ... Jarqui Jan 2016 #57
That's all I could find too... from September. Perhaps Herridge is a little confused? lamp_shade Jan 2016 #61
A fairly recent rumor by right wing media was the FBI investigation had branched Jarqui Jan 2016 #64
And the differences between DU and FR continue to disappear with each passing day LonePirate Jan 2016 #59
OMG itcfish Jan 2016 #63
HRC not that dumb. SansACause Jan 2016 #68
It's not a matter of being dumb... TipTok Jan 2016 #81
Is this actually LBN? I can't find your headline at the link provided. (n/t) thesquanderer Jan 2016 #70
It's there EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #78
Here's what I get at your link: thesquanderer Jan 2016 #83
You guys are like kids waiting for Santa when it comes to these emails. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #73
No. It would be debunked with facts and links. Divernan Jan 2016 #74
So some tweet that is only on right-wing sites is stirring you guys up again - THIS IS OLD OKNancy Jan 2016 #79
The problem is that there have been so many fake scandals involving the Clintons. potone Jan 2016 #80
Wow, DUers carrying water for an uncorroborated story Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2016 #82
Usual Suspects...... Grassy Knoll Jan 2016 #88
Fox? The same Fox that employs Oliver North? KamaAina Jan 2016 #89
Locking In_The_Wind Jan 2016 #91
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FOX: FBI has recoved ALL ...»Reply #61