Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
68. The only honest answer Ms. Nuland could have given...
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:07 PM
Dec 2011

would have been, "I can't say as I do not have the clearance to know whether a US government program of assassination by inducing cancer exists. If I did have the clearance to know, I still would not be allowed to disclose it. If such a program did exist, it would not formally reside in the State Department."

In fact, "I don't know and if I did I couldn't tell you" should cover at least half the questions advanced to her and most other PR personnel of opaque organizations, like the agencies of the USG. They should wear a button that says that, would save a lot of time.

One part of me says this is far-fetched. The other knows better Sarah Ibarruri Dec 2011 #1
Really? What are the "stranger forms of regime change" than by spreading cancer that the US Renew Deal Dec 2011 #3
You might want to read... Wind Dancer Dec 2011 #6
I don't have access to your book right now Renew Deal Dec 2011 #7
It says dotymed Dec 2011 #22
If someone cites a book they should point out what it says Renew Deal Dec 2011 #39
Basically the premise is kenfrequed Dec 2011 #56
Waste of space? Wind Dancer Dec 2011 #65
Oh please. 99th_Monkey Dec 2011 #16
It's a fairly simple question. Renew Deal Dec 2011 #43
What is common knowledge? liberalmike27 Dec 2011 #53
Study Cuba kenfrequed Dec 2011 #54
I assume the poster was referring to this RZM Dec 2011 #55
Sure.. kenfrequed Dec 2011 #59
Oh of course its not impossible but then neither is me winning the powerball its just cstanleytech Dec 2011 #4
Personally, I think the "odds" are quite different ... imho. ~nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2011 #18
Maybe Chavez should look at the Russians. Renew Deal Dec 2011 #2
Yeah, because the US has never engaged in biological terrorism. David__77 Dec 2011 #5
So was the infection of so many Guatemalan citizens with syphyllis, without their knowledge. Judi Lynn Dec 2011 #9
The US is also killing off huge amounts of leftists with heart disease. boppers Dec 2011 #8
+1 JDPriestly Dec 2011 #10
So you think Bush's reinstituting the policy allowing for the assassination of world leaders was a Dover Dec 2011 #11
The rise of the left in South America has been a huge blow to the Global Capitalists. sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #12
Agreed. A huge blow. I also think perhaps there may have been some expectation that we, the U.S. Dover Dec 2011 #15
+1....n/t unkachuck Dec 2011 #91
It's possible, but using poisons or radioactive rays or whatever to do it JDPriestly Dec 2011 #13
"They WOULD do it" is equivalent to "they DID do it" when there's moral indigation to be had. Dreamer Tatum Dec 2011 #14
Is ''lickspittle'' another word for ''conspiracy nut''? Octafish Dec 2011 #25
It is science fiction. Robin Cook beat Chavez to this over 20 years ago RZM Dec 2011 #17
A lot of science fiction ends up coming true. Neoma Dec 2011 #70
I can believe I am targeted for death by bush, or space nazis, or whatever.... boppers Dec 2011 #19
Ah, so you're saying that although you think the idea is absurd, you would approve? JackRiddler Dec 2011 #67
Or I believe insane, and delusional people, kill. boppers Dec 2011 #96
You seem to be confusing the killers and their targets, however. JackRiddler Dec 2011 #99
What did I mean? boppers Dec 2011 #101
Yes, but what did you mean by "it's time for somebody to step up"? JackRiddler Dec 2011 #102
You don't know how podiums work? boppers Dec 2011 #103
The context of this thread made me wonder, but if that's what you mean, fine. JackRiddler Dec 2011 #104
JD, a few years ago, Drone strikes would have been dotymed Dec 2011 #23
Why would drone strikes have been considered crazy? DissedByBush Dec 2011 #45
I was referring to the immorality of killing innocents... dotymed Dec 2011 #84
Who is killed is a separate issue from the method of weapon delivery n/t DissedByBush Dec 2011 #89
We've using man-less munitions for over 50 years. boppers Dec 2011 #97
How do you know others around them haven't gotten cancer? lunatica Dec 2011 #34
Everybody I know, and everybody you know, has cancer. boppers Dec 2011 #98
Low level chronic neurotoxic exposures are commonly used to kill, maim and disable political/ AikidoSoul Dec 2011 #94
Shhhh. Don't let the secret out. COLGATE4 Dec 2011 #27
Sure... kenfrequed Dec 2011 #50
vocalized musing receives a pro forma, news at 11. NuttyFluffers Dec 2011 #20
I didn't think the U.S. was doing cancerous assassinations JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2011 #21
"Horrific and reprehensible" describes "our" dotymed Dec 2011 #24
"All" left leaning leaders? COLGATE4 Dec 2011 #28
I don't really believe this, however obamanut2012 Dec 2011 #26
I think it's funny he got them to deny it. bemildred Dec 2011 #30
LOL EFerrari Dec 2011 #32
How did 'he' get them to deny it? Victoria Nuland was asked a question by a reporter msanthrope Dec 2011 #42
"Chavez' deft diplomacy" bemildred Dec 2011 #49
R#7 & K for, started to bwah-hah but sad, well ya get what you vote for/Venezuela n/t UTUSN Dec 2011 #29
Apply some common sense Lurks Often Dec 2011 #31
Why any response at all? Solly Mack Dec 2011 #33
+1. bemildred Dec 2011 #35
Hey bemildred Solly Mack Dec 2011 #37
She was asked a direct question by a reporter. msanthrope Dec 2011 #38
She should have stuck with "not worthy of comment". nt bemildred Dec 2011 #40
So, having been proven incorrect, you now grouse about her form? msanthrope Dec 2011 #44
"Proven"? bemildred Dec 2011 #47
The best response would have been DissedByBush Dec 2011 #48
I like your latter response, best....nt msanthrope Dec 2011 #52
Um, it was a State Department briefing, and she was asked a direct question. msanthrope Dec 2011 #36
Google is great, isn't it? nt bemildred Dec 2011 #41
Especially when 5 seconds on it dispels notions of Chavez's diplomatic prowess. msanthrope Dec 2011 #51
Assuming one thinks that clowning around is diplomatic prowess. nt bemildred Dec 2011 #57
That Chavez is a clown is something you and I agree upon. The people of Venezuela, however, pay the msanthrope Dec 2011 #60
Your deep concern about the people of Venezuela is noted. nt bemildred Dec 2011 #62
LOL Thank you! I assumed it was during a Q&A, as I didn't assume Nuland was a blurter who had Solly Mack Dec 2011 #46
I don't think she was defensive. More dismissive. nt msanthrope Dec 2011 #58
:) Solly Mack Dec 2011 #61
Notice Ms. Nuland never denied it. LiberalLovinLug Dec 2011 #83
Because the US plotting to kill other countries' leaders would be so very new and unlikely . . . TomClash Dec 2011 #63
It's not even 'conspiracy theory.' It's batshit nuts. nt msanthrope Dec 2011 #64
That's what they said about Mario Savio TomClash Dec 2011 #69
Jeebus. Way to dis Mario Savio. nt msanthrope Dec 2011 #74
Oh please TomClash Dec 2011 #76
Against Mario Savio? Mario Savio died because of AF. msanthrope Dec 2011 #81
It's called an analogy TomClash Dec 2011 #86
Revere? Don't think so. nt hack89 Dec 2011 #77
Read misanthrope sig line TomClash Dec 2011 #78
I understand all that. I just think he is an obscure American and not revered. That's all. nt hack89 Dec 2011 #79
Hm. The Reagan Memorial is thataway. JackRiddler Dec 2011 #87
So I am a republican because Savio is not a household name? OK, nt. hack89 Dec 2011 #90
Who said you're a Republican? Just pointing you to a "revered American." JackRiddler Dec 2011 #92
Well - being reasonably well known to a majority of Americans would be a good starting point. hack89 Dec 2011 #95
speaking of 'batshit' insane, ever see the Clooney movie: "Men who stare at Goats"? marasinghe Dec 2011 #93
As the son and nephew of breast cancer survivors... iandhr Dec 2011 #66
The only honest answer Ms. Nuland could have given... JackRiddler Dec 2011 #68
Seriously if the US wanted to assassinate these Latin American leaders fujiyama Dec 2011 #71
Exactly, if they wanted to send a "warning" they would do something like cstanleytech Dec 2011 #72
Yeah, just like Castro. EFerrari Dec 2011 #75
Yup just like Castro since he is 85 years old the odds are higher and higher something would get him cstanleytech Dec 2011 #85
I think that's probably lost on most here. dipsydoodle Jan 2012 #108
Happy New Year, dipsydoodle! EFerrari Jan 2012 #110
They did try what they thought was a 'more efficient method' sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #80
And the kicker is that each one has done quite well treestar Dec 2011 #82
Well, now I'm suspicious. DireStrike Dec 2011 #73
He's probably thinking of 'The Karen Silkwood Story.' freshwest Dec 2011 #88
Let's not overlook/underestimate aliens Islandlife Dec 2011 #100
Seems like a non-denial denial. n/t daleo Jan 2012 #105
On the basis of this topic, I'm going to buy stock in every tin foil-related company I can find. PavePusher Jan 2012 #106
I still can't believe Nuland is our State Dept. spokesperson n/t Enrique Jan 2012 #107
Perhaps regulations are to blame, as in the lack of. Puzzledtraveller Jan 2012 #109
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US rejects Hugo Chavez re...»Reply #68