Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama ‘amused’ by ‘strict interpreters of the Constitution’ inventing ways to block Scalia replaceme [View all]0rganism
(23,937 posts)29. he should nominate the replacement in a couple weeks regardless
of course, McConnell's senate will block the nomination
and then a couple weeks later Obama can nominate another one
and another one
and another one
and they can all be highly qualified minorities, judicial professionals and maybe some with JAG backgrounds, etc.
and the Republican senators can dig their party's grave as deep as they like
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama ‘amused’ by ‘strict interpreters of the Constitution’ inventing ways to block Scalia replaceme [View all]
bemildred
Feb 2016
OP
Scalia was not a strict constructionist. He could twist his opinions like a pretzel to support
Skwmom
Feb 2016
#2
They should run Reagan's words in a commerical on Fox about him letting him nominate a judge in his
kimbutgar
Feb 2016
#10
Of course the president is correct. And after all if the Republicans could elect a president then
totodeinhere
Feb 2016
#11
Yes, understated, I considered "baffled" and "confused" but "amused" is better.
bemildred
Feb 2016
#37