Latest Breaking News

Unknown Beatle

(2,672 posts)

47. "Red Faced"

Reply to BillZBubb (Reply #45)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 06:49 PM

Mar 2016

I stand corrected.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

51 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Physicists find extreme violation of local realism in quantum hypergraph states [View all] bananas Mar 2016 OP

I think I'll have to wait for this to be posted on another site fbc Mar 2016 #1

"extreme violation of local realism"? KamaAina Mar 2016 #2

Indeed, that is probably the party's platform's principle principal... xocet Mar 2016 #7

Yes, but how do we get "disentangled" from them? villager Mar 2016 #16

Ah, therein lies the rub. KamaAina Mar 2016 #17

Typically, entanglement is broken by observation mindwalker_i Mar 2016 #19

And since we're clearly observing collapse, will there be fission, or fusion, as a result? villager Mar 2016 #22

You get a cat in living in a box. Fuddnik Mar 2016 #24

So 1%ers imagine that they live "outside the box." If the economy is dead *inside* the box villager Mar 2016 #25

It is collapsing and we're observing that mindwalker_i Mar 2016 #36

So if I understand you correctly... gregcrawford Mar 2016 #43

Yup mindwalker_i Mar 2016 #46

No silly RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #26

Do we really need more threads about the Bundies? noamnety Mar 2016 #3

K&R. nt tblue37 Mar 2016 #4

k&r McCamy Taylor Mar 2016 #5

Can you explain what is meant by "notions of 'reality' "? Are you actually referring to what is xocet Mar 2016 #10

When you find a religion whose dogma is subject to Kelvin Mace Mar 2016 #20

You're ignoring the entire correspondence problem. Igel Mar 2016 #33

On my planet sulphurdunn Mar 2016 #6

Here is the article... xocet Mar 2016 #8

While I appreciate the marvels of particle physics... gregcrawford Mar 2016 #44

How long before Deepak Chopra spins this into another pseudoscience moneymaker for himself? Orrex Mar 2016 #9

Well hell. I thought that was pretty obivous. Katashi_itto Mar 2016 #11

I like it. bemildred Mar 2016 #12

Of course they wait until a Friday afternoon, when no one is looking, to dump this news. NT mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2016 #13

Kerspert !!! pangaia Mar 2016 #14

God that was good,, I godda repeat..... pangaia Mar 2016 #15

... FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #21

K&R Solly Mack Mar 2016 #18

I'm 61 years old and my time here on this plane Unknown Beatle Mar 2016 #23

Not that it matters much with respect to your point but... BillZBubb Mar 2016 #27

How old is the universe then? Unknown Beatle Mar 2016 #28

To the best of our knowledge a "tad" under 14 billion years. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #38

They base the age of the universe by the farthest object Unknown Beatle Mar 2016 #40

No, the cosmic background radiation is the key, not visibile "objects". BillZBubb Mar 2016 #45

"Red Faced" Unknown Beatle Mar 2016 #47

No sweat, this stuff gets confusing sometimes (Plus you might still be right!) BillZBubb Mar 2016 #48

While admitting that this is beside your point, WMAP data and Planck data nevertheless yielded: xocet Mar 2016 #30

Uh, yeah Liberal Unrelenting Mar 2016 #29

Has Sheldon been notified of the findings ??? SamKnause Mar 2016 #31

Alerting! edbermac Mar 2016 #32

I'm glad you posted this, Bananas, and thanks. NBachers Mar 2016 #34

For Some Your reality is an illusion Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #35

Hillary. Pauldg47 Mar 2016 #42

+1 stranger81 Mar 2016 #49

I just goddamn KNEW IT!!! jomin41 Mar 2016 #37

I'm all for violating realism... surrealAmerican Mar 2016 #39

Does this have to do with the difference between exit polls... dchill Mar 2016 #41

Who is ahead ashling Mar 2016 #50

wow, I don't know where to start or finish Demonaut Mar 2016 #51