Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: UN expands Argentine sovereignty over maritime area [View all]forest444
(5,902 posts)32. Excellent update. Thank you, Judi.
Question is: will the British comply?
If I were a betting man, I'd probably wager against it. I'd be very surprised, in fact, if they even order the oil companies currently exploring those (now Argentine) waters out.
As far as the islands themselves they know that Argentina has neither the military capacity nor the disposition to enforce its sovereignty over them, and that NATO, moreover, is interested in keeping Thatcher's base available for its own uses.
The response from London will basically be "come and take it." I hope I'm wrong about that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, it means the western half of said zone is now illegal per international laws of the sea.
forest444
Mar 2016
#3
On the sovereignty dispute perhaps - which this ruling does not impact at all.
forest444
Mar 2016
#8
Nope. Everything from Argentina to Antarctica is now Argentina's, except for the 12 mile bubble.
Xithras
Mar 2016
#9
Argentina has recognized a 160 mile exclusionary fishing zone around the Falklands
hack89
Mar 2016
#11
Nope. I copied that map straight off the UN website, right out of the approved proposal.
Xithras
Mar 2016
#22
I'm just glad they have Michelle Bachelet there, not some Pinochet grease monkey like Piņera.
forest444
Mar 2016
#29
No the British won't comply forest. Its a non-binding decision of the UN. Britain isn't going
Bacchus4.0
Mar 2016
#44