Latest Breaking News

pnwmom

(108,959 posts)

37. Please prove that it isn't accurate that the first written request was sent on October 28.

Wed May 4, 2016, 11:35 PM

May 2016

Because this is a letter repeating that date that was issued by the National Archives.

https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2015/pdf/state-dept-response-to-wester-04-02-2015.pdf

As you know, NARA has been updating its guidance on the management of emails. In furtherance of that guidance and to ensure that our records are as complete as possible, on October 28, 2014, Under Secretary Kennedy sent a letter to the representatives of former Secretaries Clinton, Powell, Rice, and Albright to request that copies of federal records be made available to the Department (see1attachments 4-7).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Deadlines loom for answers in Clinton email probe as U.S. judge sets discovery [View all] Land of Enchantment May 2016 OP

Here's her answer: no. She didn't. She knew that all her emails to and from .gov pnwmom May 2016 #1

Explains why the government had to ask her Press Virginia May 2016 #6

The state department had to repeatedly ask for Clinton's emails NWCorona May 2016 #14

No, they asked her once. She didn't resist. But it took a month to go through 55,000 emails. pnwmom May 2016 #15

Not true. They asked for them multiple times going back to June 2014 NWCorona May 2016 #16

Link, please. Here's mine. pnwmom May 2016 #21

And here's mine. NWCorona May 2016 #23

Yes she did. She had her lawyers stiff arm the State Department Ash_F May 2016 #18

Link, please. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #20

Here Ash_F May 2016 #24

. . . pnwmom May 2016 #25

Negotiations began in August Ash_F May 2016 #27

Whatever the heck that means. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #28

It means it did not take them "1 month" Ash_F May 2016 #29

It took them five weeks from the time the letter was sent. And there was no official pnwmom May 2016 #30

Right just State Department officials making a request Ash_F May 2016 #31

The only thing we know for sure is that an official written request was sent on October 28. pnwmom May 2016 #32

I don't think the Times was the only news source that reported on the Summer negotiations. Ash_F May 2016 #33

Nothing matters till the written letter was sent. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #36

To you maybe Ash_F May 2016 #38

How many do you send involving 55,000 pages of emails? pnwmom May 2016 #39

None, but those belonged to the government in the first place Ash_F May 2016 #43

Meh. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #44

After all, your source is Clinton's own website, and therefore completely trustworthy Android3.14 May 2016 #35

Please prove that it isn't accurate that the first written request was sent on October 28. pnwmom May 2016 #37

The same information is available from the National Archives. pnwmom May 2016 #40

judicial watch BHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! leftofcool May 2016 #2

let me guess.... JonLeibowitz May 2016 #9

And some Sanders supporters are lapping it up like water out of a dog bowl. Chicago1980 May 2016 #19

More like dogs lapping up water out of a toilet bowl. nt COLGATE4 May 2016 #42

where are supporters of Senator Sanders commenting at all? OwlinAZ May 2016 #45

No Hillary troll, truth teller. Chicago1980 May 2016 #46

Only a fool treats these guys like fools. Android3.14 May 2016 #47

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Skittles May 2016 #3

seems like the Clinton folks are good at closing their ears, with lots of zzzzzzzzzzz's tomm2thumbs May 2016 #4

i believe it's been demonstrated to the satisfaction of many mooseprime May 2016 #8

Indeed! Who needs any legally acceptable proof of guit when certain people are perfectly happy with beastie boy May 2016 #12

I am so sorry you agree with judicial watch over Huma's maternity leave. leftofcool May 2016 #34

first sentence tomm2thumbs May 2016 #41

Some here laugh at FOIA and I find that curious for liberals, very curious. haikugal May 2016 #5

Come on - you and I both know that those people aren't liberals. Maedhros May 2016 #17

Yeah, but I was being kind by calling them liberals, not correct. haikugal May 2016 #22

I thought the date was interesting. This part of the story Land of Enchantment May 2016 #7

Hell I probably would take the 5th as well especially considering what they went on to nail cstanleytech May 2016 #10

Yeah, I think he can plead the 5th in Land of Enchantment May 2016 #11

Unless its a blanket immunity for both state and federal crimes cstanleytech May 2016 #13

remember - this is not the FBI investigation grasswire May 2016 #26

Locking Duplicate Thread. Continue this discussion here: In_The_Wind May 2016 #48