Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Deadlines loom for answers in Clinton email probe as U.S. judge sets discovery [View all]tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)41. first sentence
"A federal judge on Wednesday directed State Department officials and top aides to Hillary Clinton to answer questions under oath by June 29 about whether they intentionally thwarted federal open-records laws by allowing Clintons use of a private email server throughout her tenure as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013."
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Deadlines loom for answers in Clinton email probe as U.S. judge sets discovery [View all]
Land of Enchantment
May 2016
OP
No, they asked her once. She didn't resist. But it took a month to go through 55,000 emails.
pnwmom
May 2016
#15
It took them five weeks from the time the letter was sent. And there was no official
pnwmom
May 2016
#30
The only thing we know for sure is that an official written request was sent on October 28.
pnwmom
May 2016
#32
I don't think the Times was the only news source that reported on the Summer negotiations.
Ash_F
May 2016
#33
After all, your source is Clinton's own website, and therefore completely trustworthy
Android3.14
May 2016
#35
Please prove that it isn't accurate that the first written request was sent on October 28.
pnwmom
May 2016
#37
And some Sanders supporters are lapping it up like water out of a dog bowl.
Chicago1980
May 2016
#19
seems like the Clinton folks are good at closing their ears, with lots of zzzzzzzzzzz's
tomm2thumbs
May 2016
#4
Indeed! Who needs any legally acceptable proof of guit when certain people are perfectly happy with
beastie boy
May 2016
#12
Hell I probably would take the 5th as well especially considering what they went on to nail
cstanleytech
May 2016
#10