Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JumpinJehosaphat

(22 posts)
66. released? what were they tied up?
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:47 PM
May 2016

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Shifted the results in the end"? stopbush May 2016 #1
There were Hillary supporters at the time who claimed it was stolen. Spitfire of ATJ May 2016 #51
That has absolutely nothing to do with whether or why super delegates stopbush May 2016 #62
Really? That's not what I heard.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2016 #68
"Released"? billhicks76 May 2016 #57
released? what were they tied up? JumpinJehosaphat May 2016 #66
From Shaun King - the plagiarist. Gomez163 May 2016 #2
What? I never knew about any plagiarism bravenak May 2016 #4
They fired his editor for not catching his plagiarism Gomez163 May 2016 #7
Whoa!!! Why not him too? bravenak May 2016 #11
No the Editor changed his "quotes." Article Here: KoKo May 2016 #20
Thank you. 840high May 2016 #45
You are Welcome! KoKo May 2016 #47
He was accused of it because of an editor's sloppiness. The editor was fired. MADem May 2016 #9
Ooooooh! That makes better sense! bravenak May 2016 #12
Good catch. I was scratching my head also. He did the proper attribution but the editor removed it. LiberalArkie May 2016 #16
What a terrible thing to do bravenak May 2016 #24
Well, at least the editor got caught. I would imagine that happens a lot. People trying to LiberalArkie May 2016 #26
If I can't take a cheap shot at someone that disagrees with me, Gomez163 May 2016 #34
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #38
Who is Brock? Lou Brock?? Gomez163 May 2016 #40
I don't know about the plagiarism, but what does that have to do with anything? thesquanderer May 2016 #8
It goes to his credibility. Gomez163 May 2016 #13
I don't agree, but you can watch the video for yourself. He is not in it. thesquanderer May 2016 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author mac56 May 2016 #21
But you don't refute the article AgingAmerican May 2016 #25
Simply not true. 840high May 2016 #46
Yes, he got caught on Twitter by a lot of people shenmue May 2016 #53
See #9 840high May 2016 #56
IMO, the DNC waited so long to object that I can't take the "pleas" merrily May 2016 #3
No real objection of their part. DemMomma4Sanders May 2016 #18
Yeah, it just looks like trying to salvage their optics at this point. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #54
It has always worked that way liberal N proud May 2016 #5
The video had nothing to do with whether or not Bernie Sanders likes it. thesquanderer May 2016 #10
Did You Read The Article? billhicks76 May 2016 #58
There we go another attack on my username liberal N proud May 2016 #61
Um no. The superdelegates are NOT "likely to change their mind." SunSeeker May 2016 #6
not in my state...bernie took every county but one but hrc got the supers dembotoz May 2016 #22
What state is that? nt SunSeeker May 2016 #29
She didn't Lordquinton May 2016 #23
It is Sanders who wants to disenfranchise women and people of color by asking supers to flip. nt SunSeeker May 2016 #28
You mean African American voters of the older generation elljay May 2016 #41
Disgusting Attack billhicks76 May 2016 #59
By flipping superdelegates, Sanders would be negating the votes of women and POC. SunSeeker May 2016 #64
Some claimed support before he announced. Spitfire of ATJ May 2016 #52
It has been common practice to include the SD's in the court. Stop the whining. riversedge May 2016 #14
Superdelegates have been included in media vote tallies since 1984, when the system began. pnwmom May 2016 #15
Shaun King wrote the article, so the outrage and hyperbole are to be expected. annavictorious May 2016 #17
Shaun King geek tragedy May 2016 #27
LOL SunSeeker May 2016 #30
This is not LBN. LiberalFighter May 2016 #31
DNC chair must know the historical data beachbumbob May 2016 #32
Apparently this is not about what Sanders thinks passiveporcupine May 2016 #42
I believe Jesse Jackson among others questioned the wisdom of Superdelegates. Ford_Prefect May 2016 #60
They might be OK if not misused the way they have been passiveporcupine May 2016 #65
Don't touch... jtuck004 May 2016 #33
The pledged delegates don't vote until the convention, either. Does that mean the tally is 0-0? George II May 2016 #35
That's the new meme wallyworld2 May 2016 #36
The other "meme" was that the superdelegates should vote with the people. But now that.... George II May 2016 #37
I still don't know wallyworld2 May 2016 #43
Hello,,,,, Super Delegates can,, Cryptoad May 2016 #39
They pledged wallyworld2 May 2016 #44
maybe u are in need of another Political Party, Cryptoad May 2016 #69
The number of delegates needed to win the nomination includes the super delegates Gman May 2016 #48
Not reporting on the superdelegates who have supported one candidate or another NobodyHere May 2016 #49
Why is this here and not GD-P? N/t JesterCS May 2016 #50
Beats me. I already posted that and nothing happened. LiberalFighter May 2016 #55
The story goes that at least some of the Superdelegates were bought prior to any vote. Ford_Prefect May 2016 #63
The press has always counted superdelegates in declaring the presumptive nominee is past primaries Gothmog May 2016 #67
LOCKING THREAD AS ANALYSIS/OPINION LostOne4Ever May 2016 #70
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clinton and media outlets...»Reply #66