Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.S. GMO food labeling bill passes Senate [View all]IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,072 posts)37. Okay...
... I found just oodles and oodles for you!
Health risks of genetically modified foods.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18989835
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Science is not as "pure" as you think. While the idea sounds nice, the reality is often nowhere
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#19
Time has everything to do with it. We are making geneitc changes that would not occur in nature,
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#54
How is GMO scaremongering more scientific than Republican climate change denial?
Silent3
Jul 2016
#34
You're answering a different concern than the one that's typically expressed...
Silent3
Jul 2016
#89
Monsanto’s GMO Feed Creates Horrific Physical Ailments in Animals...
IthinkThereforeIAM
Jul 2016
#28
Yet your fine with claiming that Monsanto is entirely objective? Really?!
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#59
Then get some of your science friends to peer review it and stop whining that it is not!!!
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#58
thanks for this post. While peer review and repeatable results are very important, they are
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#84
Exactly. It is really not needed at this point in our society. So, why have it, except for
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#60
Modification by nature in response to adaptation is NOT the same as modification by humans.
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#18
Ah, the "tree of life" everything its the same as everything else ploy. Oh dear!!
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#61
Spare me the faux outrage. I don't wish you to die, I just wish to understand the ridiculousness of
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#83
And you, being the final word on all things "Science" here, would know not to! In the meantime,
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#95
I understand. When you can't take the heat for being called out, time to skedaddle.
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#97
oh baloney. We are not talking a single base pair. Mutations of the type that happens with GMO
newthinking
Jul 2016
#35
Calling me a liar rather than debating just makes you look like a fool. Not to mention TOS here.
newthinking
Jul 2016
#44
Tell him to try the hemlock experiment (#61); he thinks its all the same with his "Tree of Life"
FighttheFuture
Jul 2016
#85
OK, how about this, is there any evidence for your claims? Or is that also hidden...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#73
i won't do your research for you.there is plenty out there about gmos infecting other
OrwellwasRight
Jul 2016
#75
"The U.S. is the world's largest market for foods made with genetically altered ingredients."
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2016
#2
This is a terrible bill because it requires access to QR Code with a SmartPhone
Equinox Moon
Jul 2016
#6
and you'd have to scan every single item you put in your basket to avoid GMOs
OrwellwasRight
Jul 2016
#57
Center for Food Safety (CFS) Condemns Senate Vote on GMO Non-Labeling Bill
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2016
#10
I don't want to have to pull out my phone in the middle of grocery shopping. NT
Eric J in MN
Jul 2016
#62
Of all the major issues facing us, why are so many people so concerned about magic DNA?
cpwm17
Jul 2016
#65
I'll be honest and say I kinda like debunking obviously wrong information, but it does get tiring...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#74