Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Abouttime

(675 posts)

12. Remember, this election was stolen

Reply to MichMan (Original post)

Tue Dec 13, 2016, 10:53 AM

Dec 2016

The machines might have been tampered with to record one trump vote on every ballot, this needs to be looked into.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroits precincts [View all] MichMan Dec 2016 OP

and of course the right will go nuts over this because the black vote there Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #1

Why wouldn't they go nuts? forthemiddle Dec 2016 #4

True. I just hope it's not padded votes for HRC, and if so hopefully it's only small differences Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #38

These were extremely strong precincts for Clinton. Yo_Mama Dec 2016 #8

wonder how that happens stillcool Dec 2016 #2

Machines had a higher number than the poll workers' tally. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2016 #6

Yet many are demanding hand counts as the standard MichMan Dec 2016 #13

Hand-recounts are done by multiple workers JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2016 #15

I have appointed to an election audit committee for my county in AZ for years. former9thward Dec 2016 #24

With hand counts there's more than one person doing it. Both sides have a representative brush Dec 2016 #26

I believe it was sloppiness and poor training not malfeasance MichMan Dec 2016 #32

Could be, but there was no need to add Clinton votes. She was going to win anyway brush Dec 2016 #33

In that case stillcool Dec 2016 #16

If the ballots are re-fed due to problems Qutzupalotl Dec 2016 #10

These issues were ignored election night MichMan Dec 2016 #11

If the machines had worked correctly Qutzupalotl Dec 2016 #14

So erroneous vote totals are to be ignored unless there is a recount? MichMan Dec 2016 #17

Vote totals cannot be verified without a recount. Qutzupalotl Dec 2016 #18

They should be verified the night of the election, not only when there is a recount MichMan Dec 2016 #20

And there is no recourse, Qutzupalotl Dec 2016 #25

This should be the reason for a recount not the reason to avoid one..... think Dec 2016 #3

The law that states they can't be recounted forthemiddle Dec 2016 #5

I think that law had good intentions originally MichMan Dec 2016 #21

Isnt getting the count right on election night most important? MichMan Dec 2016 #7

They don't seem to be in any particular hurry. ucrdem Dec 2016 #9

Remember, this election was stolen Abouttime Dec 2016 #12

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #19

Cross-check may be to blame... Blanks Dec 2016 #28

With HRC winning 95% of the vote there not likely. nt texasmomof3 Dec 2016 #30

Hillary certain to win 95%, seems like a prime target to make sure those votes weren't counted brush Dec 2016 #34

They were all counted the first time MichMan Dec 2016 #35

From what I read and what said in the video report, cavalier attitude seems to sum up the concern ffr Dec 2016 #22

I agree MichMan Dec 2016 #23

47.5 to 47.3, much closer. were provisional votes ever counted? & what about the 90k 'blank ballots? Sunlei Dec 2016 #27

The provisional ballots are key... Blanks Dec 2016 #29

I can't even find a state count of how many provisional votes are pending, thought its about 50,000? Sunlei Dec 2016 #31

First a confession Uponthegears Dec 2016 #36

Trump received 3 % of the votes MichMan Dec 2016 #37