Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

get the red out

(13,698 posts)
19. We sure don't
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:15 PM
Feb 2017

I was seriously angry about a lot of the flaws in the campaign, but some of those are a given. I wanted Sanders to be the nominee, and I still think Russia caused Hillary to lose, so it's hard to quantify to what degree the democratic campaign went wrong? Democrats are battling conspiracy-theory central out here in red state land! I am now wondering how much of that has been generated over time by trolls working for Putin! The last few weeks have been a tremendous education for me. I will say this, it is damned hard to reach people who have been subverted by conspiracy theories. So I am hoping Trump will go down as the traitor he is, then maybe a few more people will be open to reality.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And none of it matters get the red out Feb 2017 #1
THIS Zoonart Feb 2017 #3
We don't have to pretend our campaign was flawless to acknowledge that Russia messed with things. Ken Burch Feb 2017 #4
We sure don't get the red out Feb 2017 #19
That's something to hope for. Ken Burch Feb 2017 #21
It's a matter of timing, as well as priorities. Russia and the assist they got from bettyellen Feb 2017 #20
And I join you in calling for the Russian role to be addressed. Ken Burch Feb 2017 #22
It's a mistake to say middle America was ignored- the policies were there and she spoke to them bettyellen Feb 2017 #26
That may have contributed; but she "lost" thanks primarily to Putin's vote hackers. tenorly Feb 2017 #2
Provide any evidence of vote "hacking" brooklynite Feb 2017 #7
Absence of evidence, lest we forget, isn't evidence of absence. tenorly Feb 2017 #15
Stephen Miller would be proud... brooklynite Feb 2017 #23
He'd be proud of someone who likes to shoot down allegations of pro-Trump Russian vote tampering. tenorly Feb 2017 #27
So can people finally say that here without being accused of ignoring Putin and racism Ken Burch Feb 2017 #5
No, wrong, she lost because elmac Feb 2017 #6
idiots don't understand media editing. unblock Feb 2017 #8
I'm still convinced Obama could save a baby from a burning building... Initech Feb 2017 #9
This subject has been approached before but you don't hear it. Ford_Prefect Feb 2017 #11
yes, hillary could have run an even better campaign. unblock Feb 2017 #13
Yes!!! Phoenix61 Feb 2017 #16
She lost for 1 and only 1 reason. And that is just undeniable. FigTree Feb 2017 #10
we all did. That helped him to connect even more. Sunlei Feb 2017 #12
OF COURSE every person running for the job of chief organizer will UNANIMOUSLY pnwmom Feb 2017 #14
Hillary's Campaign Attacked The Wrong Way videohead5 Feb 2017 #17
I think the FBI intervention cost her a lot of votes, not just enough to enable her to narrowly win. StevieM Feb 2017 #31
He sounds like Dolt45: "Only I know what went wrong and how to fix it!" randome Feb 2017 #18
wrong Wibly Feb 2017 #24
She didn't listen to the DNC and state parties TexasBushwhacker Feb 2017 #28
Hillary lost because when she was 9 points ahead in the polls pnwmom Feb 2017 #30
Hardcore Denial: over 1000 Dem seats lost in 8 years. They all talked too much about Trump. delisen Feb 2017 #25
If Hillary was running against Hitler, should she have done nothing pnwmom Feb 2017 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author DonViejo Feb 2017 #29
She lost because the FBI (and State Dept. Inspector General's Office) repeatedly lied to StevieM Feb 2017 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Daily 202: DNC chair ...»Reply #19